My response of ----
Why would I waste my time verifying this when you obviously don't care-----. was based on my interpretation of your comments in the previous post to mean the following; You wanted verification of what I laid out but it still wasn't going to sway your opinion. Couple that with the fact that I was a tad annoyed you seemed to think I was making this up. You got my heated response. I've always considered you one of the most reasonable posters on here so I was a tad surprised. If I misread the intent of your comments then my bad
Nolan was traveling in Europe when he had called LaFontaine to help set him up with tickets to "Book of Morman" for him and his wife. They were planning on seeing the show when they were
in New York to watch Jordan play the Isles on Nov 14th. Here is what followed
http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=691676
"LaFontaine took over as president of hockey operations and called Nolan to join him and finish out the season.
Nolan was travelling in Europe when he got the call from LaFontaine, who promised him Broadway theatre tickets. Reviving his role as a prankster from his playing days, LaFontaine told Nolan that he wouldn't be able to see the "Book of Mormon" musical or watch his son Jordan play this weekend. Instead, he'd be coaching the Sabres."[/QUOTE]
The only reason Nolan was in Buffalo was because he got hired to coach the team. Otherwise he wouldn't have been in town.
We can litigate and-relitigate the end of the Regier era and the beginning of the LaFontaine if you would like but it's going to be bulky, I promise you!
The short answer on LaFontaine is that I'm not willing to go far in either direction as to his performance, so far. The decision to send out most of the kids was an incredibly easy one. Nolan was a tougher one, that so far seems to be working. The process that led to Murray's hire seems well-thought out. The fact that Murray and Patrick were introduced on stage, somewhat concerning.
Of course it was easy. It was the smart thing to do and should have been done from the get go. Its a big reason Darcy is no longer employed.
Not sure why Patrick/Murray being introduced on stage matters. Its a fairly common practice for such a major announcement.
To answer your final question, which may give you a better view of my mindset, the short answer is that I was a Regier fan, fully endorsed his (and Ruff's) retention and had been nothing but disappointed in his results subsequent.
I was the in the same camp
The longer answer is I feel the 2011 plan was to find creative-ish ways to spend Pegula's money to end up with the exact same result we'd had prior (I was fully ready for a complete rebuild after the poor start in 2011-12, so I turned quickly and hard). After they made the tough but correct decision for a full rebuild (after the alleged attempts for Parise, Suter and Doan), I feel as though there hadn't been any plan other than tank. IMO, tanking for a top pick is only part of a rebuild but the developmental plan seemed non-existent (Grigorenko last year and this and this year's opening lineup are part of that, see my pamphlet for more!). Things like keeping Rolston, with a flimsy excuse about him "making them not need to look elsewhere" and then completely purging hockey ops 24 games later comes of, to me, as lacking any coherent plan. As I see it, there have been three since Pegula took over. Cup in Three Years. Tank. And now Actually Rebuild. I just don't see the direction from the top. That with him as an owner and when there are clearly eyes in the rear-view mirror (don't forget his Feb 22 comments about wishing they'd kept Tallinder and Lydman, either), I remain worried. You call this melodramatic and I don't quite understand why.
I agree and thats on Regier. I also think he botched the handling of Grigs and was in the process of doing the same with several other youngsters. It was incredibly disappointed then angered by Regier's stupidity on that front.
And the lamenting the loss of Lydman and Tallinder seemed like a pretty smart hockey observation to me. It was pretty dumb to let them go for the reasons they were.
But, as I said, I'm open to having my mind changed. I'm open to the idea that LaFontaine is assembling a front office that can actually lead the team in a direction. And since it's going to be years before we'll know if he has, I have plenty of opportunity to change my mind as the results dictate. So relax, because we're not settling this one today!
I'm breathing slow and deep as we speak.
If I missed anything that you really wanted my comment on, just repost and I'll reply, promise!
i think you covered everything