Hookslide
Registered User
- Nov 19, 2018
- 5,442
- 4,803
Maybe they are but not RNH at that priceYour hypothetical situation would never happen, it is clearly the Bruins looking for a center
Maybe they are but not RNH at that priceYour hypothetical situation would never happen, it is clearly the Bruins looking for a center
Pretty much this. Under no circumstance is Edmonton shopping RNH right now. He's one of a very, very short list of guys that actually took less to stay here, and he 1) did it with max term 2) wanted and got a NMC to remove any chance that he'd be traded and 3) delivered the best season of his career.
Boston would have to be offering the moon for the Oilers to even think about it. This isn't "Edmonton is shopping RNH, what would the Bruins offer" this is "Boston tries to pry RNH out of Edmonton's cold dead hands, how many crowbars are they bringing?"
I mean as a neutral person I know what I would choose.Of course he’s saying no. We’re not talking about Keller who’s stuck in Arizona. Pasta is a downgrade over RNH’s current linemates.
I feel like it’d take McAvoy or maybe ( hard maybe ) Lindholm for the oilers to take the deal and be like well this just makes our team better. Not sure if Carlo+ would cut it.
But no wat Oilers decline McAvoy for Nuge.
Lindholm for Nuge is probably the closest to fair.
I’m sure Nuge would love to play in Boston.
Of course he’s saying no. We’re not talking about Keller who’s stuck in Arizona. Pasta is a downgrade over RNH’s current linemates.
Which is fine, but expecting the Oilers to listen to "reasonable" valuations and "reasonable" offers is ludicrous.Would imagine the Bruins pass easily.
I mean as a neutral person I know what I would choose.
Bruins cannot trade #1 defenseman for RNH.
Boston vs Edmonton... one might wonder.
You absolutely listen to offers, you'd be silly not to listen to offers on ANY player.As an Oiler fan I'd listen to offers for sure, would have to be a nice deal but I would listen.
As has been stated he has a full non move clause think so probably no deal but I'd listen.
Yet only 2 points 5on5 come playoff timeLol and what has swayman done other than luck being on a generational regular season team? Rnh just put up 37 goals.
I forget swayman won game seven right?Yet only 2 points 5on5 come playoff time
Agreed... constantly reading what a big discount he took. I don't think he did. If he was Ufa last summer.. he would've gotten something similar.You absolutely listen to offers, you'd be silly not to listen to offers on ANY player.
People saying he took less to stay in Edmonton kind of overstate the fact it was pure assumption due to how much he wanted to be on the team. He likely took the same amount he would have gotten on the open market over 7 years and just had it dragged out for the 8 year term (He like gets somewhere in the 6s as a UFA).
For Edmonton to make any trade that makes sense they need value for RNH + Boston would likely need to be taking on Campbell at his full cap hit, or a 3rd team is taking on Campbell with little to no assets coming from Edmonton to offset it
So Swayman's 24-6-4 record with a 2.27 GAA was purely based purely on luck while RNH 's 37 goals were based solely on skill and had nothing to do with the fact that he was almost always on the ice with one or both of the top 2 point leaders last season.Lol and what has swayman done other than luck being on a generational regular season team? Rnh just put up 37 goals.
Oh darn, I guess the Oilers will keep RNH who they aren't interested in dealingMaybe they are but not RNH at that price
The point is completely moot. We can’t take Swayman back unless you’re taking Campbell, and an unsigned 1B goalie looking for a huge raise is worth a hell of a lot less than RNH is.So Swayman's 24-6-4 record with a 2.27 GAA was purely based purely on luck while RNH 's 37 goals were based solely on skill and had nothing to do with the fact that he was almost always on the ice with one or both of the top 2 point leaders last season.
And my point was that it's a bit disingenuous to call Swayman's season " lucky " because of the talent around him but not use the same standards with RNH.The point is completely moot. We can’t take Swayman back unless you’re taking Campbell, and an unsigned 1B goalie looking for a huge raise is worth a hell of a lot less than RNH is.
Probably because it is a message board where a poster asked a hypothetical question about a player, even noted it wasn't happening and most have not answered the simple question, what if? Even if there is a 0% chance that he is moved, it's still an interesting exercise in value finding.Why isn't this locked? Nuge isn't moving anywhere, and nobody is paying what the Oilers would want (top pair defenseman).
It's fair. We do have a sample size from RNH pre- Drai/McDavid which pointed to a 50 pt center with more upside.And my point was that it's a bit disingenuous to call Swayman's season " lucky " because of the talent around him but not use the same standards with RNH.
It's also a message board where precedent has been set for locking outlandish and one sided discussions, but whatever.Probably because it is a message board where a poster asked a hypothetical question about a player, even noted it wasn't happening and most have not answered the simple question, what if? Even if there is a 0% chance that he is moved, it's still an interesting exercise in value finding.
I'd say
Swayman
Carlo
Lysell
For
Campbell @ 20%
RNH
It doesn't matter because he's paid like a high end 3C going forward.Hes a low end 2C at best, I dont think it'd be worth it for Boston.
The gaudy point totals from last year might just have something to do with this McJesus fellow he plays with.
For this to be true, EDM would have to be calling which they won't. RNH is never waivingBoston hears the rumors of the ask from Edmonton so when the phone rings the Bruins let it go to voice mail , as a result any message that confirms the rumor will then be deleted.......