Mattilaus
Registered User
I agree, but if you had read my post you'd know I am of the opinion that he likely wouldn't be dahlin or powers' partner. So how is this relevant?There are worse outcomes than being the partner for Dahlin or Power...
I agree, but if you had read my post you'd know I am of the opinion that he likely wouldn't be dahlin or powers' partner. So how is this relevant?There are worse outcomes than being the partner for Dahlin or Power...
See this is the thing, you are arguing from a position of assuming Adams will not get a D in the off-season. This is also irrelevant if Johnson or Johnson's camp think he will.The way Adams attacks D we spend large portions of the year with Joker and Clague partnering with them. There is no floor for who gets that spot in this organization.
The way Adams attacks D we spend large portions of the year with Joker and Clague partnering with them. There is no floor for who gets that spot in this organization.
There is but the poster is so tuned out by everyone else that no one goes into those threads to respond.Why do you have to complain about the GM in every thread? Every singly topic has your same rants.
Isn’t there a thread where you can shout to yourself?
There is but the poster is so tuned out by everyone else that no one goes into those threads to respond.
You said the best case scenario was being 4D. And I am saying that being the 4th top 4 D on this team is not a bad thing as you are likely playing with Power or Dahlin.I agree, but if you had read my post you'd know I am of the opinion that he likely wouldn't be dahlin or powers' partner. So how is this relevant?
Best Case doesn't equate to most likely result. The best case is I win the lottery tomorrow but that is simply not likely to happen.You said the best case scenario was being 4D. And I am saying that being the 4th top 4 D on this team is not a bad thing as you are likely playing with Power or Dahlin.
And even if they add a top 4 D this offseason, Johnson would likely be a Sabre longer than that guy.
Has anyone just thought he may just want to take a break after that heartbreaking loss? He may not want to be around the rink, this an ATO is not in the cards for him.
I never said he was pouting nor should we assume that. Guy went back to school to win a natty and came as close as you possibly could to winning one. It's gotta be hard to accept and then a your friends are moving on to their NHL teams, it could just be mentally hard.Not really. I don't think he is home devastated and pouting over the loss from a couple of weeks ago.
Once his chance to sign and burn a year of the ELC was missed, there was really no incentive to not test free agency and at least see what is out there.
Now he has the chance to see if there is another city to choose, maybe a team with some AHL guys he is familiar with, maybe a state with a lot less income tax, or maybe just another organization where he feels he will have a better chance to reach his potential.
In the end, maybe Buffalo turns out to be his best option and he chooses the Sabres (although I think Adams may really want that draft pick at this point).
I never said he was pouting nor should we assume that. Guy went back to school to win a natty and came as close as you possibly could to winning one. It's gotta be hard to accept and then a your friends are moving on to their NHL teams, it could just be mentally hard.
Adams could also be working on a trade for a prospect swap or something like that.
Who knows!
I was thinking more of trading him for a more NHL ready dman. I.E a guy like Attard. Philly gets a higher ceiling guy for someone they need to find space for.Oh, I am certain it was mentally hard, but I am guessing he's played competitive hockey for most of his life, and I am sure he has experienced heartbreaking losses before, and if he keeps playing, he will experience heartbreaking losses in the future.
Taking a break and staying away from hockey for weeks to process a loss while his pro career opportunities are unfolding before him does sound a bit like dwelling on the past, when it would be in his best interest to just be proud of how well his team did and look forward to the next chapter of his hockey career. Sorry if I characterized that differently than you intended it.
As far as the trade goes, I feel like Adams would be lucky to get a late third for a signed Johnson, so I do not believe any team is going to give up something better than the comp 2nd, but there are *strange* GMs out there and I could be way off.
There are not a lot of teams out there where there is a clear path to a guy like Johnson being a top pairing/top PP D.Best Case doesn't equate to most likely result. The best case is I win the lottery tomorrow but that is simply not likely to happen.
I agree he is not likely to be the kind of guy who gets top pair or top PP time, but as a professional hockey player, i highly doubt he is sitting there thinking "well, the best I will ever be is a #5 D man so it doesn't matter which team I go to"There are not a lot of teams out there where there is a clear path to a guy like Johnson being a top pairing/top PP D.
Besides, if you look at what Johnson projects out to, it is not a guy that fills one of the roles that Dahlin and Power fill unless it is on a team with a really bad D.
We have no idea why Johnson hasn't signed yet and the logic that is going into the decision. I just think concerns about the Sabres D depth moving forward are interesting given how thin the Sabres D pipeline is.
It’s certainly a possibility. But that wouldn’t prevent him from signing his ELC.Has anyone just thought he may just want to take a break after that heartbreaking loss? He may not want to be around the rink, this an ATO is not in the cards for him.
He could have signed a 23/24 contract start with no rochester ato.Has anyone just thought he may just want to take a break after that heartbreaking loss? He may not want to be around the rink, this an ATO is not in the cards for him.
I have no problem with players having a realistic view of what their strengths and weaknesses are and where they would fit in a team's plans over the long term.I agree he is not likely to be the kind of guy who gets top pair or top PP time, but as a professional hockey player, i highly doubt he is sitting there thinking "well, the best I will ever be is a #5 D man so it doesn't matter which team I go to"
If that IS his mentality then I don't want him here anyways. Athletes are competitive people and I highly doubt he doesn't think he is capable of being a top guy. Again, I agree, he is unlikely to be a top D man in the league. I am just commenting on potentially his state of mind.
He is from california i believe? I could be wrong on this, someone please correct me if I am. Both Anaheim and San Jose have more opportunity on the blue line than we do. And if the argument is that he should want to play with Dahlin and Power, well maybe he wants to play with Karlsson AND still live closer to his home.
Obviously we are all just speculating at this point. I don't know anything any more than you do. These are just my thoughts as to why he might look at this team and decide it is not for him. Clearly something is making him think that.
No, you are misunderstanding what I am saying. I am not saying Rousek should expect to be a top 6 player. I am saying I don't want a Rousek who sees the bottom six as his ceiling. I want him to both want and think he can be a top 6 player or more. I want a player who is confident and tries to constantly excel. Not just say, well I am projected to be a bottom pair D man so that's all I will try to be.I have no problem with players having a realistic view of what their strengths and weaknesses are and where they would fit in a team's plans over the long term.
Would you have wanted Josh Bloom expecting to be a top line point producer in the NHL? Or Lukas Rousek thinking that way? I wouldn't. I would much rather have them focus on what the realistic path to the NHL is for them. Not every player, even 1st round picks, will realistically be top pairing/top line guys.
My guess is that there are reasons other than Dahlin, Power, and Samuelsson being here long term as to why he hasn't signed yet and may walk as a UFA.
Could he have? Maybe Adams said ATO and contract? We will never know...He could have signed a 23/24 contract start with no rochester ato.
I knew what you were saying and I disagree with it.No, you are misunderstanding what I am saying. I am not saying Rousek should expect to be a top 6 player. I am saying I don't want a Rousek who sees the bottom six as his ceiling. I want him to both want and think he can be a top 6 player or more. I want a player who is confident and tries to constantly excel. Not just say, well I am projected to be a bottom pair D man so that's all I will try to be.
To me, it would be a mark against Johnson if he thought, well it doesn't matter if I never get a shot to be a top guy because I am projected to be a bottom pair D man anyways.
Vesey wasnt drafted by us; not his fault the exexGM thinks he would sign and be worth a 3rdThis guy has made it real easy to cheer against him if he walks away. I did it with Peterson and Vesey, I have no problem dishing out more.
I don't agree that a player seeing themselves as a bottom 6 player is necessarily a bad thing. Especially when that player knows their skillset and what that type of player brings.No, you are misunderstanding what I am saying. I am not saying Rousek should expect to be a top 6 player. I am saying I don't want a Rousek who sees the bottom six as his ceiling. I want him to both want and think he can be a top 6 player or more. I want a player who is confident and tries to constantly excel. Not just say, well I am projected to be a bottom pair D man so that's all I will try to be.
To me, it would be a mark against Johnson if he thought, well it doesn't matter if I never get a shot to be a top guy because I am projected to be a bottom pair D man anyways.
I knew what you were saying and I disagree with it.
Working to be the best you can be has nothing to do with what you view your long term role to be.
I want Rousek focusing on what he needs to be for the Sabres and not other things.
I agree he is not likely to be the kind of guy who gets top pair or top PP time, but as a professional hockey player, i highly doubt he is sitting there thinking "well, the best I will ever be is a #5 D man so it doesn't matter which team I go to"
If that IS his mentality then I don't want him here anyways. Athletes are competitive people and I highly doubt he doesn't think he is capable of being a top guy. Again, I agree, he is unlikely to be a top D man in the league. I am just commenting on potentially his state of mind.
He is from california i believe? I could be wrong on this, someone please correct me if I am. Both Anaheim and San Jose have more opportunity on the blue line than we do. And if the argument is that he should want to play with Dahlin and Power, well maybe he wants to play with Karlsson AND still live closer to his home.
Obviously we are all just speculating at this point. I don't know anything any more than you do. These are just my thoughts as to why he might look at this team and decide it is not for him. Clearly something is making him think that.