So we'll pretty much have him sign for one whole season
So we'll pretty much have him sign for one whole season
Yeah I knew he would still be an RFA after his ELC just didn't know his ELC could essentially be one whole year plus like 12-8 games depending where Minnesota finishes this year. College makes things confusing.He burns year 1 of his ELC this year. He burns his 2nd (of 2) ELC years next year and then he's RFA. Unless he absolutely explodes next year, he's likely to sign a 2/3 year bridge deal at Bryson-esque money (or cheaper).
I am not completely sold on him going to free agency.
I think it is a coin flip because there are good reasons for him to sign here and there are good reasons for him to sign elsewhere.
Having Dahlin, Power, and Samuelsson as locked in core LHD for the foreseeable future could be viewed as a big negative to signing in Buffalo as opposed to elsewhere. And he might want to be closer to his SoCal home, as well.
If he gets traded as a piece of a deal, I will read that as Adams felt like he was a goner and he was treating him like a late '24 2nd round pick and not a real defensive prospect option for the Sabres.
Jeff Skinner wanted to be closer to home despite the Sabres not being a competitive team at the time.
The being closer to home thing could be overblown. Or maybe it isn't. Just like some guys would want to play for their dad and others wouldn't.
I think there is a lot of stuff with Johnson that we have no idea about. And what will motivate him to sign in Buffalo or elsewhere is all guesswork for us.
Maybe he really like the Twin Cities area and signs with the Wild...
He burns year 1 of his ELC this year. He burns his 2nd (of 2) ELC years next year and then he's RFA. Unless he absolutely explodes next year, he's likely to sign a 2/3 year bridge deal at Bryson-esque money (or cheaper).
The first real sign he might be a sabreWoof, that give away leads directly to a goal against. Not his usual safe play in the neutral zone.
When Mittelstadt was in a similar situation (expired ELC, but no RFA rights) he just took his QO.He burns year 1 of his ELC this year. He burns his 2nd (of 2) ELC years next year and then he's RFA. Unless he absolutely explodes next year, he's likely to sign a 2/3 year bridge deal at Bryson-esque money (or cheaper).
I'd be using him as trade bait, while he still has value.. Of our top 20 prospectsz hed be the guy I'd prefer to be packaged
Yeah, if he's actually signing there's no way I'd trade him....he's exactly what we're looking for and cost zero assets to add him.You don't think he's better than Bryson?
The contract situation gives us hope that burning a year is enticing but why sign here when you are so close to free agency.Yeah, if he's actually signing there's no way I'd trade him....he's exactly what we're looking for and cost no assets to add him.
In terms of straight up trade value in a vacuum, the compensatory 2nd in next years draft may actually have more value than Johnson, so i don't know if there is a huge rush to move him.I'd be using him as trade bait, while he still has value.. Of our top 20 prospectsz hed be the guy I'd prefer to be packaged
You must not watch any NHL hockey outside of the Sabres.I wouldn’t have signed here when I could walk until I saw what a goddamned disaster the defense is outside of three guys. Now…I mean…I’m not finding an easier D spot to take in this league than Bryson’s.
I watch all the hockey. Bryson isn’t an NHL player and he’s on a team that’s actually trying to be good. You won’t find that combination of that bad and that good anywhere.You must not watch any NHL hockey outside of the Sabres.
With 32 teams, the D talent is super diluted.
I mean, if you only watched Bryson while he was obviously playing injured and was skating like a shell of his former self, ok. But if you have watched the past couple of weeks when he's been healthy, less than half of the teams in the league have a 6th D that has been as serviceable as Bryson in that stretch.
Every year, a player has a rough stretch and you spend an obscene amount of energy disparaging them in every thread. Then when they start playing well, you choose a new player to target as a scapegoat. Does that ever get tiring? Because it is exhausting to read every day.
So i guess only a handful of teams in the league are actually trying to be good?I watch all the hockey. Bryson isn’t an NHL player and he’s on a team that’s actually trying to be good. You won’t find that combination of that bad and that good anywhere.
So i guess only a handful of teams in the league are actually trying to be good?
Look around the league.
Florida is dressing Mahura. Washington is dressing Matt Irwin (remember him?) Rangers are going with Harpur. Isles with Aho, etc.
Seriously. Look around the league. Bryson would be right there competing for a spot on 75% of teams, and if Buffalo waived him, he'd be claimed in a heartbeat.
Just because he doesn't have top 4 potential does not mean he is not a NHL player. Having top 4 guys in your bottom pairing is extremely rare, and trading for one to play 12-13 minutes a night is not a wise use of assets.
Is Bryson the ideal bottom pairing for this team? Of course not. But to say he is not an NHL player while looking around the league is just ignorant.
The realistic chances of Johnson making the jump from college and outplaying Bryson are extremely slim. Those are the facts.
I was personally shocked when I found out Kurtis MacDermid was not an option on any all-star ballots....Colorado is dressing some real winners too.
He gets to next contracts faster.The contract situation gives us hope that burning a year is enticing but why sign here when you are so close to free agency.
Those are the two combative points of view.
anyone describing joker and boosh as goddamn disasters isn't looking to have a fully honest conversationSo i guess only a handful of teams in the league are actually trying to be good?
Look around the league.
Florida is dressing Mahura. Washington is dressing Matt Irwin (remember him?) Rangers are going with Harpur. Isles with Aho, etc.
Seriously. Look around the league. Bryson would be right there competing for a spot on 75% of teams, and if Buffalo waived him, he'd be claimed in a heartbeat.
Just because he doesn't have top 4 potential does not mean he is not a NHL player. Having top 4 guys in your bottom pairing is extremely rare, and trading for one to play 12-13 minutes a night is not a wise use of assets.
Is Bryson the ideal bottom pairing for this team? Of course not. But to say he is not an NHL player while looking around the league is just ignorant.
The realistic chances of Johnson making the jump from college and outplaying Bryson are extremely slim. Those are the facts.
anyone describing joker and boosh as goddamn disasters isn't looking to have a fully honest conversation
Yup, they're so angry and bitter that they're totally missing out on enjoying the first fun and likeable team we've actually had in the last 12 years! Exhausting all the way around, such a shame.yeah, it is unfortunate.
It is sad. There is a small contingent of posters on this board who are not about rooting for the kids and hoping to see them succeed and grow into good players, but are always looking to point fingers and find someone to blame for all of he team's misfortune.
Often it does not matter at all if they were responsible for goals against, just the fact they were on the ice is enough for them to find fault. When everyone plays well, they lay into the GM, because there has to be someone to bitch about every day...