Ryan Johansen Saga III

Status
Not open for further replies.

elmariachi227

Registered User
Aug 27, 2012
156
3
Cleveland
I am sure every GM/Owner in the league would love to see Overheardt CRUSHED so that players will move away from him. I think its a big reason you have not seen any offer sheets. None. Nada. They are unified against this agent and want to see him lose, and lose big. Ryan could be sitting a whole year make $0.00. Future clients may look at that and shy away from this scoundrel.

I have never liked this kids attitude or work ethic. Hopefully he grows up and sees that life is bigger than him.

Well, uh, there may be a lot of mutual hatred for the contract/agent but I think there aren't a lot of teams anyway that could offer up what the Jackets should get for trading Johansen.

But the problem is we have a an egomaniac running our front office, who is more interested in being the face of the franchise himself than having an actual franchise player. Who is now throwing public hissy fits when he doesn't get his way. That is what spoiled, entitled, diva behavior looks like.

Haha, get a load of this guy.

I can't BELIEVE Johansen didn't accept this deal!!!

You know, if Johansen and his agent think he's gonna break out into something big, I can see how they would balk at a contract that averages out to over 5 a year. Honestly a contract like that is poison for both the team and Johansen if the dude is kicking around for a few years into the contract and is convinced he's outperformed it.

And, I mean, that's totally fair if they think he's gonna blow up and totally makes sense if they're asking for a 6.5 bridge out of the gate.

The problem is, he's just not worth that much. That's really all there is to it. Good on the guy and I hope he gets awesome and on first glance 4-4.5 seems fair but there are other kids skating around there who were more consistent in production and signed for 3.5


Management is using Stepan, Duchene, Couture to come up with their bridge offer. It's a little low, but Joey only has one good season. Still, all three got 5-6% of the cap at the time and for two years.

Overhardt wants double that on a bridge. No one in their right mind would compare Joey to Toews, Stamkos, or Kane.

2 years/$6 million doesn't quite get them up to Duchene or Stepan, but come on...2 years/$13m? If I was JD I would have gone 2/$8 million and then made that the offer you go public with if KO turns it down.

Even if you use % of cap (not $ amounts), you can come up with something reasonable along the lines of Duchene, Stepan, or Couture and their bridge deals. Where is this 2 year / $12-$13 million comparable coming from? (And please don't give me "but Edmonton...")

If you want the big dollars in long term deals out of your ELC then yes your performance over all three years does matter.

Having said that almost 13 minutes a night in his rookie year, well that's a lot of minutes for the 4th line and he played 16 the second year.

Don't make excuses. Toews, Taveres, and Stamkos all had infinitely better starts to their careers and the Jackets already offered him close to Taveres money. They had he put up 70-80 goals in his first three season, this would be a different conversation.

The more numbers people throw around the more obvious it is:
KO is insane and it's extortion.

He might be the best goal scorer on the Jackets, but that doesn't mean the Jackets should pay him like he's a veteran all-star talent. There's a whole league of players and contracts where the numbers go one way- and KO is asking for something that's waaaaaaay out of line.

Every time I hear someone trying to defend the terms and money, they come at it from the standpoint where they compare it to other Jackets players. You're saying the Jackets should overpay Johansen because he's the best scoring talent on their team.

Give me a break.

And that's what this all boils down to and what the FO is complaining about. His maturity issues don't even matter, because that's not the real reason this deal isn't going anywhere.
 

db2011

Registered User
Oct 10, 2011
3,565
474
Brooklyn
You play good cop bad cop in the negotiating room, not over the airwaves. I lost some respect for JD when he said he's "taking it personally". And now you're comparing him to a used car salesman?
 

Fro

Cheatin on CBJ w TBL
Mar 11, 2009
25,316
4,994
The Beach, FL
they met for at least 4 days straight...its not like they said we're not meeting with you period...they spent the weekend practically attached at the hip in traverse...
 

WannabeFinn

Beloved One
May 31, 2014
6,474
1,039
Columbus
simulationhockey.com
So some of you are essentially vilifying JD and JK for not paying the kid the ~6m/yr he "deserves", but I can almost guarantee you that if they had given him that kind of money from the start and his offensive output regressed to Dubinsky's level you'd want their heads on a plate for breaking the bank on an unproven RFA.

And let's say 5 years from now we look back on this after JD and JK's tactics worked out and we have a Stanley Cup to our name.. are you still going to call them egomaniacs in hindsight for using the tactics that they did? Would you still refer to them as incompetent?
 

NotWendell

Has also never won the lottery.
Sponsor
Oct 31, 2005
27,454
7,957
Columbus, Ohio
So some of you are essentially vilifying JD and JK for not paying the kid the ~6m/yr he "deserves", but I can almost guarantee you that if they had given him that kind of money from the start and his offensive output regressed to Dubinsky's level you'd want their heads on a plate for breaking the bank on an unproven RFA.

And let's say 5 years from now we look back on this after JD and JK's tactics worked out and we have a Stanley Cup to our name.. are you still going to call them egomaniacs in hindsight for using the tactics that they did? Would you still refer to them as incompetent?

I sum it up this way. JD and JK should bend over backwards to sign Johansen, but they shouldn't bend over forwards.
 

Jaxs

Registered User
Jul 4, 2008
9,927
685
Give him the 2x4 already. Overhardt can go to hell for poisoning the well.

JD and JK let's get this done now.

Nothing like having this huge black cloud over the start of training camp.
 

alphafox

Registered User
Jun 14, 2011
1,443
92
Work out a sign and trade with Buffalo or another top 5 lottery team. This is a headache we don't need.
 

PubOFH

Registered User
Nov 17, 2005
9,406
6
Johnstown, OH
Why do we keep drafting dudes with suck arse attitudes/work ethic in the first round??? I would rather have a guy with slightly less skill but PASSION and WORK ETHIC than guys like Johansen, Filatov, Brule, Picard, ZHERDEV, Nash. All VERY questionable in the passion for the game department.

I may have to get rid of the Pub Original Fedorov Hater name and really start hating on RJ after this.
 

WannabeFinn

Beloved One
May 31, 2014
6,474
1,039
Columbus
simulationhockey.com
To those in favor of trading, what kind of return are you even looking for? It's really easy to just say "trade him!", but why would we do so if we aren't getting the type of return that we desire? We don't need more picks or prospects, and if losing Joey hurts us as much as you all so believe, you'd kind of have to think that he'd be good enough to take a bottom 5 team.. well.. out of the bottom 5..?
 

Jaxs

Registered User
Jul 4, 2008
9,927
685
A trade doesn't make a lot of sense unless it is clear that he demands it. He knows he needs to play and can't sit out all year, because his stock will fall precipitously.
 

thebus2288*

Guest
Craig Smith, Colin Wilson, Filip Forsberg for Johansen and a 2nd round pick

Its at least close. I guess most would probably want to change the draft pick or take it away but I think it would be needed. I'd do this trade right away. And I really think it would/could benefit both teams short term and long term.
 

KJ Dangler

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
8,590
5,271
Columbus
A trade doesn't make a lot of sense unless it is clear that he demands it. He knows he needs to play and can't sit out all year, because his stock will fall precipitously.

Well, think people can only imagine the money he will want after his bridge deal is up, if he's looking for stamkos money now . Doesn't appear he wants to be here, from his contract demands. So if we we trade him and get a really good return, that would be a lot better than losing him for nothing in 2 years. Not saying it's at that point , but if they really are 2-3 mill apart, it would certainly explore what I could get for him .
 

WannabeFinn

Beloved One
May 31, 2014
6,474
1,039
Columbus
simulationhockey.com
Well, think people can only imagine the money he will want after his bridge deal is up, if he's looking for stamkos money now . Doesn't appear he wants to be here, from his contract demands. So if we we trade him and get a really good return, that would be a lot better than losing him for nothing in 2 years. Not saying it's at that point , but if they really are 2-3 mill apart, it would certainly explore what I could get for him .
Yeah he doesn't want to be here, that's why KO and CBJ management spent all of the past almost week negotiating and that's also why he tabled another offer the day after flying out of Columbus.

If he didn't want to be here I'd imagine he'd save himself, his agent, and the CBJ front office the hassle of negotiations and simply request a trade. He hasn't done that. The CBJ front office don't want to do that.

Until someone comes out with substantial evidence that he wants out.. then that's that.
 

KJ Dangler

Registered User
Oct 21, 2006
8,590
5,271
Columbus
Yeah he doesn't want to be here, that's why KO and CBJ management spent all of the past almost week negotiating and that's also why he tabled another offer the day after flying out of Columbus.

If he didn't want to be here I'd imagine he'd save himself, his agent, and the CBJ front office the hassle of negotiations and simply request a trade. He hasn't done that. The CBJ front office don't want to do that.

Until someone comes out with substantial evidence that he wants out.. then that's that.

Well of course they will negotiate , johansen and his agent don't get paid if a deal is not struck. Wanting or asking 7 mill, and passing on the long term deals the jackets offered , which are much better Than Stephan got, once again to me seems like he doesn't want to be here . Just saying if johansen won't budge off the 6.5 or 7 mill, the jackets front office know for,a fact they won't sign him. So what do you do, let him sit and hurt his value, or look at trade options ?
 

Sore Loser

Sorest of them all
Dec 9, 2006
7,622
1,220
Spokane, WA.
I say: If the "offers" from Overhardt and Johansen don't come down to a reasonable level, don't negotiate, let him sit out the year making nothing, and watch how far down the offers go next year.

I won't say the team doesn't need him, but it's certainly viable that they can succeed without him in the lineup. Yes, his 33 goals were important to our success last year, but 33 goals can be made up easily by a committee of guys who work hard and want to be here.

The only person being hurt in this situation is Ryan Johansen. The sooner he realizes that and fires Kurt Overhardt, the better.
 

EspenK

Registered User
Sep 25, 2011
15,842
4,446
To those in favor of trading, what kind of return are you even looking for? It's really easy to just say "trade him!", but why would we do so if we aren't getting the type of return that we desire? We don't need more picks or prospects, and if losing Joey hurts us as much as you all so believe, you'd kind of have to think that he'd be good enough to take a bottom 5 team.. well.. out of the bottom 5..?

I'll get flamed for this but I would seriously consider Monahan, Klimchuk, and Calgary's 1 next year. If we aren't going to pay him and surely he will want more next time then ship him to a lousy team and pray to whomever that we win the lottery.

If I were the Jackets at this point I'd make a final offer of 2 years, 4.5 mill - take it or send us a postcard from the KHL or Calgary. I originally was in the 5.5 per camp. but after seeing the comps and listening to the logic I think 4.5 is more than fair.

Ultimately I think the deal gets done like it usually does but I do think he will be a continuous pain or will not play up to his deal. He already is exhibiting Zherdev (the real one) tendencies. I just think the Jackets want to avoid him exhibiting Nash tendencies after a big, long-term deal.
 

Jaxs

Registered User
Jul 4, 2008
9,927
685
To trade him because he may want Stamkos money on his next contract doesn't add up. We are better now with Joey than without him. If he puts up numbers to deserve 8-9 plus on his next deal, then so be it.

When Nash was moved for Dubi and AA and Erixon and a 1st, we were treading water. There was room for thosr guys in the lineup. Now, being a playoff contender there is no room for a Johansen for quantity type trade, which is likely what it would be. We don't need prospects and picks. If Joey can get a player of equal value then ok, but the likelihood of that happening is pretty nil.

Give him his two year deal even they have to go near 5 a year. In two years The FO will know the right avenue to take with him.
 

Jackets16

Registered User
Jan 7, 2005
12,018
619
To trade him because he may want Stamkos money on his next contract doesn't add up. We are better now with Joey than without him. If he puts up numbers to deserve 8-9 plus on his next deal, then so be it.

When Nash was moved for Dubi and AA and Erixon and a 1st, we were treading water. There was room for thosr guys in the lineup. Now, being a playoff contender there is no room for a Johansen for quantity type trade, which is likely what it would be. We don't need prospects and picks. If Joey can get a player of equal value then ok, but the likelihood of that happening is pretty nil.

Give him his two year deal even they have to go near 5 a year. In two years The FO will know the right avenue to take with him.

The problem is he thinks he should be paid more than he deserves. So, what is he going to ask for if he deserves $8-$9 million?
 

db2011

Registered User
Oct 10, 2011
3,565
474
Brooklyn
So some of you are essentially vilifying JD and JK for not paying the kid the ~6m/yr he "deserves", but I can almost guarantee you that if they had given him that kind of money from the start and his offensive output regressed to Dubinsky's level you'd want their heads on a plate for breaking the bank on an unproven RFA.

And let's say 5 years from now we look back on this after JD and JK's tactics worked out and we have a Stanley Cup to our name.. are you still going to call them egomaniacs in hindsight for using the tactics that they did? Would you still refer to them as incompetent?

I'm frustrated with JD and JK for:
1- sticking to a number - 3 million - that is a lowball offer and insisting with red faces that it is fair;

2- for whining like they're victims here when in fact they are an organization and Joey and his agent are not equal nor do they have nearly as much leverage as the organization, as many of you are delighted to repeat;

3- and for jeopardizing Joey's presence on this roster over a couple million dollars. (And for the Gaborik trade, increasingly for the Horton signing, and letting D-Mac walk and some others things but I'll keep it on topic).

They saw their draft picks excel in Traverse City and they seem to think they're smartest guys in the room and since they have this talent in the pipeline that the talent in the pump room can be neglected. I don't support it and I'm sorry my team is being so hamfisted.

6 million per year is too high, that's not my beef.

As far as your last paragraph, you'll have to provide more hypothetical details. And of course the other side of the argument is what happens if Joey sits out, the team tanks, he winds up on a different team and proceeds to blow up en route to a Stanley Cup? Then will you still think they did the right thing by taking this negotiation personally and not budging from a $3 million offer? Sort of like, what if Gaborik rounds into form and leads the Kings to the Stanley Cup, then will this trade not be a terrible one?

Give him the 2x4 already. Overhardt can go to hell for poisoning the well.

JD and JK let's get this done now.

Nothing like having this huge black cloud over the start of training camp.

They're not offering 2x4. 2x4 isn't close to what they're offering - but I guess that's better than "not remotely close".
 

CBJRzeznik

Registered User
Mar 8, 2014
237
3
To trade him because he may want Stamkos money on his next contract doesn't add up. We are better now with Joey than without him. If he puts up numbers to deserve 8-9 plus on his next deal, then so be it.

When Nash was moved for Dubi and AA and Erixon and a 1st, we were treading water. There was room for thosr guys in the lineup. Now, being a playoff contender there is no room for a Johansen for quantity type trade, which is likely what it would be. We don't need prospects and picks. If Joey can get a player of equal value then ok, but the likelihood of that happening is pretty nil.

Give him his two year deal even they have to go near 5 a year. In two years The FO will know the right avenue to take with him.

The last 2 sentences are likely what we will see here. 4.5-5 on a 2 year deal. Hopefully it doesn't take multiple regular season games to arrive there
 

CBJWerenski8

Rest in Peace Johnny
Jun 13, 2009
43,701
26,750
It's an unfortunate thing what this has become, but this is also setting the example for future Jenner-Bobrovsky-Murray talks. We won't be pushed around in the negotiating room. We'll see how long this takes
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad