wetcoast
Registered User
- Nov 20, 2018
- 25,588
- 12,275
this is a great player in the making. all you have to do to know that is watch him play in the nhl.
He has been showing signs lately and I expect and hope for great progress next year.
this is a great player in the making. all you have to do to know that is watch him play in the nhl.
Canucks rookie Vasily Podkolzin prepares, plays like poised professional
‘He’s probably the guy we talk about the most in the room,’ captain Bo Horvat says of Podkolzin. ‘His work ethic is through the roof.’theprovince.com
Perhaps effusive testimonies from some of the vets will ease the doubts of his detractors.
It is indeed all about potential with Pod.
Im just going to link this article next time someone regurgitates a hairball of stats and questions why he deserves to be in the NHLFantastic article
Some eye catching quotes from teammates and coach
" He probably has the hardest shot on the team"
" His work ethic is through the roof"
" I dont think people realize how strong he is"
([10th overall pick+RussianVsNA development discussion]*[poor production/great eye test])^(canadian market factor)=quantity of discussion"Part 5" for a 10th overall pick
why does this guy illicit this much discussion?
Speaking of Höglander and Podkolzin, Höglander's advanced stats are significantly better than Podkolzin's. Podkolzin has higher PDO, though. In terms of xGF% for example, Podkolzin is at 47.61% while Höglander is at 51.63%, but the actual GF%s are 57.63% and 48.00%. Höglander is much better at CF% as well, with 53.32% vs 49.32%.The best part about his development is that he did it by earning the coaches trust that he could take care of things in his own end of the ice and through the neutral zone so that his coach could trust him to play more minutes, and play in crucial moments.
He’s set himself up for success by making it so the coach WANTS him on the ice in those crucial moments, and WANTS him playing in the top 6, rather than simply feeling pressured to play the guy.
Most young kids try and do it the other way around. ’Give me more ice, and I should eventually be able to put up enough points to allow you to overlook the scoring chances I consistently give up.’
Hoglander has been the opposite of Pod this year.
I think this is why, despite the gaudy point totals in the AHL, Rathbone shouldn’t be called up, and shouldn’t make the team out of camp next season. He needs to be the best young defensive d-man in Abbotsford (that d not good), to show that BB is going to trust him to play minutes. The last thing he needs is to make the team, but play 5 minutes a night, or be in and out of the lineup. That’s just ruining his development.
I think Pod has a higher scoring upside than a lot of people think. I think he has it in him to be more than a consistent 50 point player.
Morrow is a good comparable I hadn't considered actually. Could threaten 30 goals when things click, but otherwise good for 20g 50pt and a real prick to play against.The kid is just a wrecking ball out there. Hes quickly become my favourite player in the league.
Guys like Podkolzin become captains with the way they play. I've thrown this comparison before, but he really does remind me of Brendan Morrow. Just a soldier.
Podkolzin is cut from the same cloth as Brendan Morrow, Dustin Brown, Erik Cole, and Gabriel Landeskog. Just a hard working player who gives it his all, monster on the forecheck, can chip in offensively, and you just hate playing against them.
They may have different roles though? I love both players but don't get to watch much being out east. I know those stats are supposed to factor in role, and competition...but they really don't. At least not fully.Speaking of Höglander and Podkolzin, Höglander's advanced stats are significantly better than Podkolzin's. Podkolzin has higher PDO, though. In terms of xGF% for example, Podkolzin is at 47.61% while Höglander is at 51.63%, but the actual GF%s are 57.63% and 48.00%. Höglander is much better at CF% as well, with 53.32% vs 49.32%.
Mostly it's coming down to on-ice scoring %s, which for Höglander is 5.85% while for Podkolzin it's 8.00%.
As such, the stats don't really agree.
Do you understand now?I might be, i might sound like and i don't watch enough Canucks games and what ever but...
I just can't understand the reason(s) why Podkolzin is still playing in the NHL, what makes him
the best option for the Canucks?, what makes him superior to other Canucks prospects?
or other players in the AHL, who are playing great night after night, who would deserve a call up
to the NHL.
These are 100 % honest questions.