Not that I bother much with the statistics but still nice to see this guy producing.
What comes down to the obvious "Rantanen vs Nylander" debate, there's not a chance in the world Colorado would trade him for Nylander straight up. He will be the better player by the end of the day, and that's not even a mock on William.
No idea why people want to bring this guy into this topic anyway.
Who the hell knows who will be the better of the two in 5, 10 or 15 years?
That is not an exact science. The guy looking better now could look 3x worse on the NHL level.. or not..
Both of them are pretty close right now and belong to the cream of the crop of prospects not playing in the NHL right now.
I am pretty sure that Toronto would not trade Nylander for Rantanen either. Everyone is happy with their guy and assuming that there will never be a cup final of Leafs - Avs, they will play each other around 30 times in their whole careers (not counting international play).
Brayden Schenn was the unanimous #1 prospect at one point. How did that work out?
It will be interesting to see how those guys do in the WJC but who the hell cares which one is "better" right now. No way to determine it anyways.
I just hope Mikko can fulfill his potential and turn into that two-way top line winger that we really could use down the road. Up until now he looks good but he still has a mountain to climb.
Oh. He had no points last night.
Bust.
EDIT:
Sorry Kelsier. Did not want to pick on you. But I just felt sick reading those pointless Nylander vs. Rantanen posts.
Why the hell do I have to read about those in a thread that is about Rantanen, his play and his development?
If I wanted to read/talk about that, I would go to the poll section and start/read the Nylander vs. Rantanen thread.