Interesting comment on
Murat's article from J.M.:
Diving into the psychology of competitive youth sports, parents and children may help. Mike McIntyre did a great job describing his [McGroarty's] hockey journey. He frequently travelled, played in the famous Brick tournament against the best 9 yearolds in Canada, when he was 8. His family moved for his development, his connections got him invited to train with Barbara underhill. This kids support system, has not spared any expense or chance at giving him anything but the optimal opportunity to succeed. These are not the types of folks who are comfortable giving up control. High level hockey is increasingly becoming quite elitist. He is so close right now to paying off all the sacrifices his family has made for him the last 15 years.. they want an nhl opportunity when they feel like he is ready to make that step and they have little reason to believe the jets will make space for him when they think he is ready. It may very well be that he is the 14th best forward in the organization when the time is right for him, or the 11th best forward but exempt from waivers and stuck in the AHL.
Imagine never having to compromise on your development path, and now you’re 20 facing what you perceive to be the most critical point in your development, where some guys thrive and many more flop.. How could the above scenarios be acceptable to mcgroarty and his family? It’s not.
The better question is how much should nhl teams be expected to accommodate their prospects who share this mindframe? They may soon be the norm. At what point do you just accept we have to play this kid and accept some lumps because he’s the future? Top 10, top 5, top 2 pick? Ideally you want kids who are selfless, no ego, don’t think twice about making sacrifices for the team, but if this is no longer realistic to ask of your blue chip North American prospects, then something’s gotta give.