Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | Where's the Beef?

BarDownBobo

Registered User
Oct 19, 2012
6,562
3,368
City of Champions
I can't see there being a claim just because the only realistic way for them to clear cap after Kane gets back is moving Arvidsson or Henrique because they don't have NTC/NMCs and I wouldn't say trading either of them after giving them two year deals is all that realistic.
So, playing around with Puckpedia’s GM tool and they could actually fit him fairly easily even when Kane comes back. One of Dermott/Stecher and Ryan to the minors would give them enough space, even allowing them to keep an extra defender around. Unless I’m missing something with their tool when it comes to the buyouts/overage penalty….
 
  • Like
Reactions: Heavy Dee

McDNicks17

Moderator
Jul 1, 2010
42,659
32,887
Ontario
So, playing around with Puckpedia’s GM tool and they could actually fit him fairly easily even when Kane comes back. One of Dermott/Stecher and Ryan to the minors would give them enough space, even allowing them to keep an extra defender around. Unless I’m missing something with their tool when it comes to the buyouts/overage penalty….
Good call. Didn't realize we have like $1.3M in space right now, so dropping a couple $800k-900k guys definitely does.

I guess it comes down to accruing. Is a free Fabbro worth the cap you'd accrue without him for the deadline? Going to be a tough call.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TopShelfGloveSide

McHelpus

Registered User
Jan 16, 2021
2,383
3,466
Good call. Didn't realize we have like $1.3M in space right now, so dropping a couple $800k-900k guys definitely does.

I guess it comes down to accruing. Is a free Fabbro worth the cap you'd accrue without him for the deadline? Going to be a tough call.
You know the answer.
 

FunkyChicken

Registered User
Jul 24, 2003
2,504
1,048
Good call. Didn't realize we have like $1.3M in space right now, so dropping a couple $800k-900k guys definitely does.

I guess it comes down to accruing. Is a free Fabbro worth the cap you'd accrue without him for the deadline? Going to be a tough call.
Is there room on the Condors for 2 more veteran contracts?
I thought were only had room for one created by the Attard trade.
Someone would either have to get claimed or traded if that is the case.
 

CupofOil

Knob Flavored Coffey
Aug 20, 2009
48,598
45,469
NYC
If you were targeting a RHD that may be available at the deadline, Fabbro would have been near the top of your list.

Now you can get him without sending out any assets? This is why Bowman makes 5 million a year. Figure it out Stan.

Keep your assets to add goaltending at the deadline.
Uh, Fabbro will be claimed well before the Oilers get a chance so there goes that.

Time to cry over waiver wire players again? Lets gooo
Crying over a waiver wire player that has no chance to make it to the Oilers but, yeah, Fire Stan rabble rabble rabble because he won't claim a player that won't be there to claim.
 

TopShelfGloveSide

Registered User
Dec 10, 2018
19,909
28,827
Good call. Didn't realize we have like $1.3M in space right now, so dropping a couple $800k-900k guys definitely does.

I guess it comes down to accruing. Is a free Fabbro worth the cap you'd accrue without him for the deadline? Going to be a tough call.
Interesting. Saving the assets we would have to spend at the TDL for a top 4 D would be nice though.
 

McShogun99

Registered User
Aug 30, 2009
18,805
15,470
Edmonton
I don't know. If Nashville is literally giving him away, is he going to be the final piece to this D core for the playoffs?
I think management has their eyes on a certain player and will get him closer to the deadline. We're probably stuck with the current team until then unless we start really falling out of the race.
 

Scrapin Ice

Registered User
Oct 25, 2024
70
19
I think management has their eyes on a certain player and will get him closer to the deadline. We're probably stuck with the current team until then unless we start really falling out of the race.
Unfortunately this is probably true. Who knows what could happen to said player in the next 4 months.
I'd prefer we waive one of the three (likely Dermott) and bring in a basic Nurse complement in the meantime. (not Fabbro). This still doesn't hurt our cap for the deadline.
 
Last edited:

5 Mins 4 Ftg

Life is better with no expectations.
Sponsor
Apr 3, 2016
51,931
90,285
Edmonton
So you’re bias because nothing else supports your take

Nothing else other than my 15+ years of coaching, player evaluation, development and Hockey Canada coaching credentials, nope.

Bouchard has had his struggles this year and is far below the bar he set for himself in the playoffs and the last 2/3rd of the season. He has shown he is capable of far more and hope he can find his game sooner than later.

Kane is already on LTIR.

I thought they pulled him off of LTIR when they sent down Cagguilla and Philp?
edit - just checked Puckpedia and he is still on LTIR as you say....which is most confusing. I thought they wanted to accrue cap space????
 
Last edited:

Vagabond

Registered User
Dec 24, 2004
9,868
4,920
Edmonton
There’s few if any actual right handed trade deadline guys out there though. It’s super slim pickings.

I don't disagree but at the same time I feel our defense has gotten softer and way smaller since last season. He looks very underwhelming.

I'm sure there'll be more options closer to The TDL.
 

Heavy Dee

Registered User
May 29, 2005
9,881
8,434
Uh, Fabbro will be claimed well before the Oilers get a chance so there goes that.


Crying over a waiver wire player that has no chance to make it to the Oilers but, yeah, Fire Stan rabble rabble rabble because he won't claim a player that won't be there to claim.
So what. Let's just hope Stan is on the job and at least puts in a claim. That stuff leaks out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: McTonyBrar

Behind Enemy Lines

Registered User
Feb 19, 2003
16,886
18,706
Vancouver
Fabbro is interesting. But he's a 3RD guy who at age 26 might have some mid pair potential however the Oilers have their project guy in Emberson and two cheap journeyman clogging up their roster. Price point is a sticky wicket.

Fabbro's likely an upgrade on the bottom three RD but would it be enough to blow through the cap bucks being warchessed to hope to acquire at trade deadline?
 

Soli

Supervision Required
Sep 8, 2005
22,040
12,315


According to what he's been hearing, Friedman thinks Fabbro's $2.5M is going to be too prohibitive for teams and that he'll go unclaimed.
 

foshizzle

Registered User
Feb 1, 2007
5,647
5,064
Nothing else other than my 15+ years of coaching, player evaluation, development and Hockey Canada coaching credentials, nope.

Bouchard has had his struggles this year and is far below the bar he set for himself in the playoffs and the last 2/3rd of the season. He has shown he is capable of far more and hope he can find his game sooner than later.



I thought they pulled him off of LTIR when they sent down Cagguilla and Philp?
edit - just checked Puckpedia and he is still on LTIR as you say....which is most confusing. I thought they wanted to accrue cap space????
That’s right. Nothing to back it up. There’s been numerous coaching and scouting that has gotten plenty wrong. You’re basically stating your bias.
 

belair

Win it for Ben!
Apr 9, 2010
39,594
23,289
Canada
That would be nuts
Not really. The guy has been pretty vanilla outside of one season a few years back. I could see Utah claiming just due to their injury situation and available cap. But the Oilers should absolutely not put their cap situation into question for a defenseman of his caliber.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad