The Cheez
Registered User
- Aug 14, 2015
- 254
- 253
Was just thinking landeskog would look good in an oilers jersey.
Was wondering about this since Price is due his $11M signing bonus in September apparently. Is July 1st just the first day a club can elect to pay the bonus?
Seattle could get some great assets if they flipped price and retained 3.5M or so for the 5 years. Unless they think they can go full Vegas and contend immediately, I think they could have a good bidding war for a retained Price among the wanna-be contender teams in the league.
They've taken a bath during the pandemic and they were missing payments to hotels and shit before all that.
That's news to me. I'd love to hear more.
I agree this could probably stay in the Keith thread but I've seen a bunch of comments suggesting the Oilers had all the leverage. I don't know for certain - you may be right. Some one else as well. My belief from what I've read is the Hawks were prepared for either scenario - Keith staying and Keith leaving. And they were prepared to live with either.
If Price is exposed I would be trying hard to land him with Seattle retaining salary.
Unfortunately he’s only willing to waive for the draft. Other than that the NMC stays in place.
Unfortunately he’s only willing to waive for the draft. Other than that the NMC stays in place.
If Price is exposed I would be trying hard to land him with Seattle retaining salary.
He would be hard to fit even at 50% retention
I believe he could then be re-asked to waive.
Can't imagine why he'd prefer to play in Seattle than in Edmonton.
I'd take Price at $5M all day
That would be amazing. But is Seattle willing to eat salary for that long? They'd need something good from us.If Price is exposed I would be trying hard to land him with Seattle retaining salary.
Interesting response on twitter to Tarasenko--I think people are over looking his last 2 seasons and are hung up on previous glory. We do not know how bad his injury is and for 7.5? I would be concerned if I was on the team getting him
The Kassian thing is so frustrating but the more I think about it, the more I think is why Archibald over Benson if you are determined to protect Kassian? Kassian I get people want to argue the importance of his style of play and when he's on blah, blah, blah, but what the hell does Archibald even bring that you can't replace at league minimum.
That's like saying Klefbom brings more to the table than Bear when he's healthy.
But honestly that's besides the point and I don't think Gregor really gets that. It's not about whether or not Kassian brings more to the table than Benson. It's about whether Kassian brings more to the table than the $3.2M you'd free up in the off chance he was selected.