It does help to look at it in this manner. Basically by doing this we turn 4th overall and a piece we're going to lose anyway into a #2 and a #3/4 defenceman.
It would sting, no doubt, but it would have immediate dividends.
Yup and the more I think about it, the more on board I am with that scenario. Until we don't acquire or develop that top pairing dmen, we can take the route Vancouver did with their D back in 2011. A top 4 that consisted of a couple of #2, #3-4 dmen. Hamhuis, Edler, Ehrhoff and Bieksa compared to Klefbom, Hamonic, Vatanen and Sekera doesn't seem that far off to be honest. No true top pairing guy but just a very solid group of dmen. Of course they had Luongo and we have Talbot so there's a difference there but just in terms of D core, they seem fairly similar. Add in Davidson, Nurse and maybe Gryba. I actually like the look of that.
I'm a bit torn on it myself, but the current MO is we need d help now, and Hamonic accomplishes that. Yakupov's value is such a complex thing to discuss. At least this deal results in us getting a top-4 dman and a 1st round pick without losing any of the core.
I understand the rationale in it.
Yeah I agree. We need D, need to improve immediately and a young player like Tkachuk won't make a true impact for another few years. However, I may (or may not) be in the minority here but I believe we need to trade one of the "core" players for the sake of a culture change. Now I'm not advocating we trade them for nothing but I believe trading one of the "core" players (Ebs, RNH or Hall) will shake things up and send this team a bit of a message.