Nerish
Registered User
- Apr 25, 2014
- 8
- 16
Haha that’s fair, long time lurker but never been one to troll, just saw the comment and wanted to pass along what I heardHe averages 0.65 posts per year, he ain't messing around!
Haha that’s fair, long time lurker but never been one to troll, just saw the comment and wanted to pass along what I heardHe averages 0.65 posts per year, he ain't messing around!
I can see them trading him, but I don't see why the wouldn't qualify him.Timothy Liljegren would be top of my list if he does not get a QO from the Leafs
So they valued draft picks and prospects over Cap Space. The only real season they save anything on the cap is this year. The year they have 3.225M on Brown and now 3.01M dead buyout cap. so they are now down 6.335M this year.
Campbell buyout "Savings."
24/25: 1.15 + 1.1 = 2.25 Million "Saving" 2.75 M
25/26: 1.15 + 2.3 = 3.45 Million "Saving" 1.55M
26/27: 1.15 + 2.6 = 3.75 Million "Saving" 1.25M
Next three years = No "Savings." All 1.5 million dollar penalties.
They could have saved 5 million a year. Instead they are losing over 2M to almost 4M a year on the first three. Then another 1.5M for the three after that.
Add in that any player they acquired would replace another say 2 or 3 million dollar player and you just gave up on a 7- 8 million dollar winger for Drai.
To me, that's frustrating when you really look at the numbers.
So they valued draft picks and prospects over Cap Space. The only real season they "save" anything on the cap is this year. The year they have 3.225M on Brown and now 3.01M dead buyout cap. So they are now down 6.335M this year.
Campbell buyout "Savings."
24/25: 1.15 + 1.1 = 2.25 Million "Saving" 2.75 M
25/26: 1.15 + 2.3 = 3.45 Million "Saving" 1.55M
26/27: 1.15 + 2.6 = 3.75 Million "Saving" 1.25M
Next three years = No "Savings." All 1.5 million dollar penalties.
They could have saved 5 million a year. Instead they are losing over 2M to almost 4M a year on the first three. Then another 1.5M for the three after that.
Add in that any player they acquired would replace another say 2 or 3 million dollar player and you just gave up on a 7- 8 million dollar winger for Drai.
To me, that's frustrating when you really look at the numbers.
You don't get 3.9M. You get 2.75M. You actually lose 2.25M but whose counting? Sounds better to the masses when you talk about the "Savings." while really not doing the math.Nobody was trading for JC even if we attached the picks. And if we retained 50% for 3 years that’s 2.5 dead cap each year. We need that 3.9 this year 2.5 doesn’t cut it. If we want to keep McDrai we cannot go back into the season with out a winger for Leon. This will allow us to sign that winger
The penalty years kick in this coming season.Which draft picks do you think would be required to dump all of Campbell’s deal? If you think it can be done with middle round picks and mediocre prospects you’re out to lunch.
Yes, keeping what would probably be multiple first round picks (or equivalent) is better than absorbing the completely irrelevant penalty of what will probably be at most 2% of the cap by the time the penalty years kick in.
The penalty years kick in this coming season.
They save 1.2 million over 6 years instead of burying him a savings of 200 k a year that's itWe save $3.9M this season. Savings, not penalty.
Also moot point - you skipped over the thesis of your post. What do you truly think it would take to add to Campbell to dump him completely?
The bigger boon would be the accrued salary from his contract at next year's trade deadline.disagree. I think a healthy Kane can still be a huge boon to this team.
That's assuming he CAN get healthy, of course...
They save 1.2 million over 6 years instead of burying him a savings of 200 k a year that's it
Easy math for you 3 years at 3.9 is 11.7 the buyout is 10.5 over 6 yearsThis makes no sense. The “dead cap” that a few here are fixated on would be about $3.8M if Campbell was buried.
You don't get 3.9M. You get 2.75M. You actually lose 2.25M but whose counting? Sounds better to the masses when you talk about the "Savings." while really not doing the math.
That "We must win next year and need the cap space now." is exactly why Neal got bought out by Holland. Still paying for that. Didn't win anything that year either.
The going rate for 2mil over 3 years is a second round draft pick.
Math.We save $3.9M this season. Savings, not penalty.
Also moot point - you skipped over the thesis of your post. What do you truly think it would take to add to Campbell to dump him completely?
Easy math for you 3 years at 3.9 is 11.7 the buyout is 10.5 over 6 years
To be fair tho, how many points would hyman or nuge get playing in the bottom 6? I don't think any player putting up any points on any line is "leeching" pointsThe bigger boon would be the accrued salary from his contract at next year's trade deadline.
Kane leeching points off of our skill lines has benefitted us very little since he first arrived. His game evaporated when he was removed from those skill lines. And the numerous occasions where his teammates had to ream him out isn't a trend that's likely to correct as this player heads deeper into his 30s.
Foegele was a more impactful player this year both regular season and postseason. And it's unaminimous that him making more than $3m AAV next year means he's gone.
Math.
You only "save" 2.7 because 1.15M can be buried in the minors.
You are penalized 2.3 (much more in years 2 and 3) because you could have saved 5 million but shiny draft picks and prospects are more important.
I already stated it, but I'll repeat myself.
The going rate for 2 mil over three years is a 2nd round draft pick. He was an UFA. Just act like you had to trade for him.