Rumor: - Rumors & Proposals Thread | If Babcock is Our New Coach Will Players Want to Come Here? | Page 201 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

Rumor: Rumors & Proposals Thread | If Babcock is Our New Coach Will Players Want to Come Here?

  • If you are having issues logging in, we have found opening the log in page in a new tab/window rather than using the pop out should resolve these issues. We are working to get this resolved and thank you for patience.
  • Due to the increased volume of league transactions, the Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk section is temporarily restricted to where threads may only be started by moderators and sponsors. We anticipate that this restriction will be lifted some time after the first round of the draft.
When dumping Ceci? Just fine.

Nurse will get moved and they Oilers will do fine, people need to chill out.

If Werenski is out there, which seems to be the case, teams are very obviously going to chase him first.
Nurse and Werenski are in two different stratospheres. At team like Pittsburgh is not going to be in on him. The price would be ridiculous for a team at their stage. I'd say the same for Philly but to a lesser degree. Frankly, if Werenski gets traded it will likely only involve a couple of select teams that he dictates. If I had to guess I'd say SJ would be the most likely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jimmi McJenkins
I would sign Pulju IDGAF. People get stuck on one opinion and stubborn about it. The guy was kind of a joke here but that was then this is now. Maturity and experience and double hip replacement can change things. He has talent and size. Obviously I sure as shit wouldn’t get into a bidding war for him but if we could have him on league min I’d say that’s helpful depth. Let Babcock have a crack at him. People will be like “uggghh boo retreads” — whatever, you turn over every rock. He’ll be better and more NHL ready than the other euro signings we’ve tried.

Obviously if McDrai don’t want him back then you don’t do it though
 
Nurse and Werenski are in two different stratospheres. At team like Pittsburgh is not going to be in on him. The price would be ridiculous for a team at their stage. I'd say the same for Philly but to a lesser degree. Frankly, if Werenski gets traded it will likely only involve a couple of select teams that he dictates. If I had to guess I'd say SJ would be the most likely.
For sure, I'm in no way suggesting that they're on the same level. What I'm saying if you're interesting in Nurse, you're calling about Werenski first, to see what's up.
 
Nurse and Werenski are in two different stratospheres. At team like Pittsburgh is not going to be in on him. The price would be ridiculous for a team at their stage. I'd say the same for Philly but to a lesser degree. Frankly, if Werenski gets traded it will likely only involve a couple of select teams that he dictates. If I had to guess I'd say SJ would be the most likely.
I wouldn’t be surprised if he tried to force his way to a contender. I’m not sure SJ is there yet and he may be tired of losing.
 
I would sign Pulju IDGAF. People get stuck on one opinion and stubborn about it. The guy was kind of a joke here but that was then this is now. Maturity and experience and double hip replacement can change things. He has talent and size. Obviously I sure as shit wouldn’t get into a bidding war for him but if we could have him on league min I’d say that’s helpful depth. Let Babcock have a crack at him. People will be like “uggghh boo retreads” — whatever, you turn over every rock. He’ll be better and more NHL ready than the other euro signings we’ve tried.

Obviously if McDrai don’t want him back then you don’t do it though

Bad hips or not, he looked like a lost puppy on the ice. You can’t fix a low hockey IQ
 
I would sign Pulju IDGAF. People get stuck on one opinion and stubborn about it. The guy was kind of a joke here but that was then this is now. Maturity and experience and double hip replacement can change things. He has talent and size. Obviously I sure as shit wouldn’t get into a bidding war for him but if we could have him on league min I’d say that’s helpful depth. Let Babcock have a crack at him. People will be like “uggghh boo retreads” — whatever, you turn over every rock. He’ll be better and more NHL ready than the other euro signings we’ve tried.

Obviously if McDrai don’t want him back then you don’t do it though
He hasn't proven anything anywhere in the NHL. Why do you want to just bring back the past? Especially someone from the past who is a bust?
 
They can only bring back Nurse if Walman or Ekholm (or both) are wanting out.

Honestly the true Machiavellian move would be to trade Walman before his new contract kicked in, and target a better fit for next to Bouchard.
I love Ekholm, but he's 36 and I'd rather see his minutes reduced and a better skater put next to Bouch. Truth be told, I would have liked to see Stastney get a proper game or two next to Bouchard at evens. Similar to how Kulak was used next to him in the '25 playoffs. He ate a lot of minutes, but was subbed out during key situations.

Stastney-Bouchard
Ekholm-Emberson
Nurse-Murphy

Suddently every pairing has a strong skater on it, and there's plenty of size to go around.

Maybe Walman could do well there too. (him and Bouchard did hold their head above water when he first got here without much support behind them, and he did well in the playoffs playing with Klingberg)
 
Honestly the true Machiavellian move would be to trade Walman before his new contract kicked in, and target a better fit for next to Bouchard.
I love Ekholm, but he's 36 and I'd rather see his minutes reduced and a better skater put next to Bouch. Truth be told, I would have liked to see Stastney get a proper game or two next to Bouchard at evens. Similar to how Kulak worked next to him in the '25 playoffs

Stastney-Bouchard
Ekholm-Emberson
Nurse-Murphy

Suddently every pairing has a strong skater on it, and there's plenty of size to go around.

Maybe Walman could do well there too. (him and Bouchard did hold their head above water when he first got here without much support behind them, and he did well in the playoffs playing with Klingberg)
Gross, Stastney should be moved on from if possible lol.

No you move Nurse, and if you want to move Walman, do that too. But Stastney isn't good, lets stop pretending otherwise.
 
Say what you want about it, but he was pretty consistently one of the most advanced defensive players on the team through the neutral zone. He showed plenty of hockey IQ there.
And the Kings had amazing fancies last year as well, they had a league 2nd worst 22 regulation wins tied with Chicago.

Sometimes even those stats lie.
 
Honestly the true Machiavellian move would be to trade Walman before his new contract kicked in, and target a better fit for next to Bouchard.
I love Ekholm, but he's 36 and I'd rather see his minutes reduced and a better skater put next to Bouch. Truth be told, I would have liked to see Stastney get a proper game or two next to Bouchard at evens. Similar to how Kulak was used next to him in the '25 playoffs. He ate a lot of minutes, but was subbed out during key situations.

Stastney-Bouchard
Ekholm-Emberson
Nurse-Murphy

Suddently every pairing has a strong skater on it, and there's plenty of size to go around.

Maybe Walman could do well there too. (him and Bouchard did hold their head above water when he first got here without much support behind them, and he did well in the playoffs playing with Klingberg)

Problem with this is I don't think Walman's contract is movable.

Seriously.
 
Bad hips or not, he looked like a lost puppy on the ice. You can’t fix a low hockey IQ
No he didnt. His finishing was not great and that was it. He was always in the right position on the ice. His puck retrievals were excellent. There is a reason McDavid scored more with him on the ice than not. He was good at chasing pucks down and giving it to McDavid. Terrible at finishing plays- but good at hunting loose pucks
 
I wouldn’t be surprised if he tried to force his way to a contender. I’m not sure SJ is there yet and he may be tired of losing.
They are not their yet but if they added Werenski for high quality but disposable assets they will be a lot closer. And in the couple of years it may take to fully ripen he is in the California sun rather than Columbus.

The big problem is that right now it would be tough for any of the usual suspects to fit his money in and at the same time to come up with a package that CBJ might bite on. Next off season the cap opens up even more and he has a 10 team trade list so they could get a bidding war.

I might add Carolina to the list as well. But I am not sure what they might offer up. Their 1st's are basically early 2nd's from a few years ago. Stankoven is the only young asset they might part with that might move the needle.

(Added in Edit: I forgot about Nikishin. Carolina could make sense. )
 
Last edited:
He hasn't proven anything anywhere in the NHL. Why do you want to just bring back the past? Especially someone from the past who is a bust?
Because the past when he had 2 bad hips and he was a child and he didn’t speak any English doesn’t f***ing matter? Who gives a f***? The guy will be way better than David Tomasek. We’re talking about a depth piece and he was decent in that role for other NHL teams when he was younger dumber and less healthy.

His size and puck protection alone make him useful in specific roles, and he has a sneaky shot from his junior days that has a lot of velocity. He’s basically your average bottom guy but with hidden talents. I’m pretty sure if Babcock had access to him as a roster option, he would use him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: foshizzle
Good skater, excellent on the forecheck and down ice pressure, great defensively. This is exactly what DJ Smith described yesterday as the type of game Babcock wants to deploy. Perfect for that 3rd line
He had a good year on big ice. From what I can read on him, that hip resurfacing surgery sapped a lot of his lateral mobility. So it's hard to see him be much of a help other than being a guy who can battle on the forecheck. Still probably doesn't have the greatest hands and doesn't make quick plays under pressure.
 
And the Kings had amazing fancies last year as well, they had a league 2nd worst 22 regulation wins tied with Chicago.

Sometimes even those stats lie.
I'm not talking advanced stats or metrics. You could tell he was a guy who understood lanes and pressure. There's a reason why he created so many turnovers on the backcheck.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad