McIce Whole
Registered User
Really hoping the Oilers keep Lucic at 6 years at 6 mill per year at this point. It's already an overpayment but don't add more term or money to that.
I have no idea how this can be answered so soon.
I also don't understand the reasoning that if Larsson just gets 10 more points than he did last year (which doesn't seem unlikely at all), that this suddenly becomes a much more acceptable trade.
My last response to you on the matter. The rest of the hockey world agrees with me that the Oilers lost the trade. So yes, you are under rating Hall. You have hated him for years.
Larsson is a good D, but an 18p shut down D isn't top pairing. If he can become a 30p shut down D then he is. We traded a sure fire top line player for a maybe top pairing D.
And the rest of the hockey world agrees with that assessment. So is everyone on the world wrong, or are you?
Respond if you like, but I won't follow up.
And you have to remember that those 18 points are ES points, as they wanted to him play as primary shutdown guy on ES and PK.
I have no idea how this can be answered so soon.
I also don't understand the reasoning that if Larsson just gets 10 more points than he did last year (which doesn't seem unlikely at all), that this suddenly becomes a much more acceptable trade.
Just curious, not seeking to inflame, but who makes up the "hockey world"?
My last response to you on the matter. The rest of the hockey world agrees with me that the Oilers lost the trade. So yes, you are under rating Hall. You have hated him for years.
Larsson is a good D, but an 18p shut down D isn't top pairing. If he can become a 30p shut down D then he is. We traded a sure fire top line player for a maybe top pairing D.
And the rest of the hockey world agrees with that assessment. So is everyone on the world wrong, or are you?
Respond if you like, but I won't follow up.
Not much news on Romak Polak. He would probably be a terrific fit on the 3rd pairing. Veteran right handed dman that might come cheap?
That's what makes that statement comical, he all of sudden becomes first pairing material if he gets 12 more points?
I think expecting a 66% scoring increase just because a guy changes teams is kinda comical. 12 p may seem easy to get, but when a guy only scores 18 over a full year, is it really?
at this point, just give him the money.
I think expecting a 66% scoring increase just because a guy changes teams is kinda comical. 12 p may seem easy to get, but when a guy only scores 18 over a full year, is it really?