Tony Romo
Registered User
- Sep 25, 2011
- 15,006
- 2,119
Pm me.i am interested in acquiring an extra pick though coming up
Me too but I can't even mention the position because it might affect the integrity of the draft.Pretty crazy there's two (in my opinion) fringe top 50 players still on the board and neither of them have been taken yet. Really interested how far they're gonna fall.
These are supposed to be for fun so being perfectly rational would be irrational. Some guys take ATDs way too seriously which is also irrational because you can't rationally compare players from different eras. Just have fun I say!... No one said I had to be completely rational in this draft
Have these guys been taken yet? I'm guessing Shell was one of them unless both guys went before you picked. Dickerson was the first name to pop in my head when I read this the other day.Pretty crazy there's two(in my opinion) fringe top 50 players still on the board and neither of them have been taken yet.
Really interested how far they're gonna fall.
Dickerson was one. The other is still up there.Have these guys been taken yet? I'm guessing Shell was one of them unless both guys went before you picked. Dickerson was the first name to pop in my head when I read this the o
I would've had no qualms about taking Dickerson as my RB1 a couple rounds ago, I had been thinking about it as the RB's kept falling. Faulk just fits in better with what I was going to go for with an RB2Dickerson was one. The other is still up there.
Shell isn't top 50, but he slipped further than he should have in my opinion.
I don't think it's who you're thinking of.Dickerson was one. The other is still up there. ...
767 catches is top 40 all-time. There's a little offense below.... Faulk just fits in better with what I was going to go for with an RB2