GKJ
Global Moderator
- Feb 27, 2002
- 192,972
- 43,460
Yeah, that's my point.The thing is too...
it is really not tough to get tape on them today.
I dont have the facilities an NHL team has... but I could - for example - clip together a 13 hour video of Ilya Pautov within 40 minutes ahaha.
There is zero excuse anymore in terms of relying on tournament samples. Unless someone is playing a comically low level you can always get infinite tape of them now.
Pretty much every Euro league all the way down to their u-17 levels have every game fully filmed and available... (u-16 and u-15 is where it starts to get iffy... and the Belarusian u-20 league is an exception too, their games are hard to get your mitts on)
MHL is however a far harder league to produce in than the QMJHL (and tbh the level is higher than the QMJHL as well while being lower scoring)...
but while Pautov is interesting the most likely outcome is probably an okay KHL player down the line. But that is a nice likely outcome for a later pick really.
It looks like he's light years away from KHL. I haven't liked his game recently. I'm watching another his game right now and the pre-season impression evaporates every shift. It feels like he loses 100% of puck battles, getting pushed around even at the MHL level. Also he's not a play driver. Maistrenko and Dontsov (went undrafted in 2024 draft) are the real leaders of the team while Pautov looks more like a passanger on the Maistrenko line, who spends a lot of time with the KHL team and without him Pautov doesn't score many points. He shows some flashes of his skill but he looks like a long-term project even for KHL.Though if Pautov is for real, he should get promoted at some point this season.
According to who?MHL is a bit above the CHL and USHL, a notch below the best NCAA leagues (NCHC, Big East, Big Ten).
D-0, ppg is solid performance, D+1?, maybe 1.25 ppg?
Though if Pautov is for real, he should get promoted at some point this season.
According to who?
A couple sites that do NHLe for various leagues.According to who?
Since I was using it to put Pautov's MHL stats in perspective, that's exactly how you'd use it to compare scoring in different leagues. As I've pointed out to Bader, that doesn't take into account other factors.NHLe is a scoring multiplier, not a league strength indicator. The MHL and Russian hockey in general is low scoring so naturally their scoring multiplier will be higher as their players play in other leagues across the world. Also some people's NHLe models are outdated and use a range of data that isn't relevant to some leagues anymore. It's why Michkov graded out better than Bedard in a lot of models when almost no one would take Michkov over Bedard. It overrates KHL production based on data from a decade+ ago. There's studies that show hockey in Russia is declining so even if that was true at one point (it wasn't) it's unlikely that it still holds true.
Also another example of what happens when stats get in the wrong hands. People have no idea what a stat does or does not represent - going out and making absolute declarations.
Are there any N/A players in the Russian junior leagues? Minor league?The thing is too...
it is really not tough to get tape on them today.
I dont have the facilities an NHL team has... but I could - for example - clip together a 13 hour video of Ilya Pautov within 40 minutes ahaha.
There is zero excuse anymore in terms of relying on tournament samples. Unless someone is playing a comically low level you can always get infinite tape of them now.
Pretty much every Euro league all the way down to their u-17 levels have every game fully filmed and available... (u-16 and u-15 is where it starts to get iffy... and the Belarusian u-20 league is an exception too, their games are hard to get your mitts on)
MHL is however a far harder league to produce in than the QMJHL (and tbh the level is higher than the QMJHL as well while being lower scoring)...
but while Pautov is interesting the most likely outcome is probably an okay KHL player down the line. But that is a nice likely outcome for a later pick really.
He was a 6th round pick. He is 18 years old.Pautov in the 1st period
Positives:
- Rather good at zone exits
- Carries the puck fast enough when has open space
- Showed some flashes of good vision
Negatives:
- Not agressive without the puck but when he does participate in puck battles, loses all of them
- Passing accuracy is just ok
- When he does't have open space he struggles most of the time
- He's a perimeter player
That's true, he's a long term project. But I'd like to see some progress in his game. His teammate Dontsov wasn't drafted at all and plays way better right now despite being even smaller than Pautov and playing at C.He was a 6th round pick. He is 18 years old.