Veaktore Vitto
Registered User
- May 9, 2026
- 177
- 76
Kevin weekes predicted this 11 days ago
Nailed it especially if Berards involved
Kevin weekes predicted this 11 days ago
If Bjorck is gone at 5 Reid likely falls to us…
now you've done it....No way it's 5. No f***ing way...I mean even Drury can't be that stupid. 26, yes. Not 5.
They are light on RD. Makes a ton of sense. 1 for 1 is a dream ScenarioSchneider to the Ducks just makes too much sense
1 for 1 would be great but my guess would be we’d have to add. And I dont want to add the 26thSchneider to the Ducks just makes too much sense
Still richWell there goes that.
Schendier+26 most likely.
This is not the movie Draft Day. Drury is not that smart. We are not that lucky.That's not exactly promising...
I mean...#5 for MacTavish and then Trocheck and #26 to move to #8 or #9? Would that be the play? f***.
Mollie paywall article saying they shouldn’t trade Schneider #HeGone
I would throw in Berard or a 3rd1 for 1 would be great but my guess would be we’d have to add. And I dont want to add the 26th
What does the article actually say?
She re-tweeted it so I'm guessing something in there is relevant.
If the Blueshirts are going to trade Schneider this offseason, a comparable player must be coming back to New York. A source indicated that is the prerequisite for president and general manager Chris Drury to sign off on a trade for the 24-year-old blueliner.
I'd call McTavish comparable![]()
Trade activity is picking up around NHL — but only one incentive should matter for Rangers
Inquiries on pending restricted free agent Braden Schneider continue to roll in as the Rangers prepare for the NHL Draft and the start of free agency July 1.nypost.com