Semantics, but I don't credit a GM much for player development. I do credit a GM for putting together a coherent organization with coaches following the same plan. If those pieces are in place, then good options are there to put players where their development is best served. That's at least a partial contribution, and the rest is on the coaches and of course the player.If you can’t give Adams credit for the development of Thompson and our kids line, then don’t. Seems unreasonable for a number of reasons, but okay
KA's "patience" has been much a result of simply needing time to reset after major moves. Risto had to go, Reinhart probably didn't want to stay, and Eichel never gets traded without the neck drama. Some things beyond his control have gone his way, but he's putting/keeping good people in charge of Rochester, Buffalo, and scouting, and making sure everyone's input is valued. Do those things and when good things happen it's not luck anymore.
Edit - he's got to make moves for Dmen. There's no choice but to. Make good moves to balance out the young talent level and it all will make sense. Fail and now there's a big problem.