The comment is not meant as one ups upmanship, it's meant to look what is before us. See the here and now.
They aren't playing McCabe with the big club in the hope we finish low. They are playing him because they believe in I'm. Is there risk? Sure, but to be honest, they aren't exactly enamoured with Pysyk, as was put forth by JW, and I happen to concur.
Personally, I think they're playing McCabe because they don't have a choice. If they had nhl players on the left side, he'd still be in Rochester, imo.
Personally, I think they're playing McCabe because they don't have a choice. If they had nhl players on the left side, he'd still be in Rochester, imo.
Didn't say he did. I just don't think he's dialed in. At least not lately.Had a chance encounter with him at.a Bills game. Doesn't strike me as the type with an ego agenda.
I think McCabe has been playing really well since the All Star break.
Some trade thoughts given feedback from the main forum:
To San Jose: Chad Johnson, Mark Pysyk
To Buffalo: M Mueller, 2017 2nd
To Dallas: M Foligno, Buf 3rd
To Buffalo: Lindell, 2016 2nd
To Chicago: McGinn (50% retained), Legwand (50% retained)
To Buffalo: 1st rounder, Bickell
Hate the Mueller trade, would do the other two.Some trade thoughts given feedback from the main forum:
To San Jose: Chad Johnson, Mark Pysyk
To Buffalo: M Mueller, 2017 2nd
To Dallas: M Foligno, Buf 3rd
To Buffalo: Lindell, 2016 2nd
To Chicago: McGinn (50% retained), Legwand (50% retained)
To Buffalo: 1st rounder, Bickell
I mentioned before wondering if they could find a home for Gorges on a contender. He's terrible and the sooner he goes, the better.
Unless we find some other bodies for the left side, its doubtful he gets moved. My ideal scenario for next year is him pushed into the bottom 4 or even bottom pair with improvements on the blueline
Some trade thoughts given feedback from the main forum:
To San Jose: Chad Johnson, Mark Pysyk
To Buffalo: M Mueller, 2017 2nd
To Dallas: M Foligno, Buf 3rd
To Buffalo: Lindell, 2016 2nd
To Chicago: McGinn (50% retained), Legwand (50% retained)
To Buffalo: 1st rounder, Bickell
I don't think Foligno and a 3rd gets you Lindell on his own, let alone Dallas having to add a 2nd. Stars fans think Lindell is going to be their left-handed version of Klingberg.
Buffalo 3rd (61-65) vs Dallas 2nd (55-60). There isn't much of a difference here.
You missed my point. I'm saying Dallas probably doesn't trade Lindell for Foligno and a 3rd, and with that being the case they certainly wouldn't throw a late-2nd on top of that.
I'm curious if Lindell is obtainable. Seems to fit in with our needs and Dallas is deep @ LD.
Let's look at that haseoke39. Do they really need him up here? Haven't they played a eighty on the left this season?
I don't believe the RD/LD scenario is the driving factor behind what JW said he was hearing about Pysyk. I do believe Pysyk is expendable. I watch the same games you all do. I don't see Pysyks presence as some stabilizing force. His presence has certainly not had a significant, or, in my personal opinion, any impact game to game.
If what JW says in indeed true, I can't see Pysyks absence as putting the Sabres in a downward spiral.
Also, figuring out the defense...
Draft 4-8, pick Juolevi
Off-season:
3rd round pick to Ottawa for Wiercioch
- Ottawa management seems down on him. Their fans would take it. He seems like the kind of guy who could benefit playing with Pysyk.
2017 1st & Guhle to Winnepeg for Enstrom
Could switch it to Edler if the age scares you a bit, or want more long-term (Edler is two years younger than Enstrom and is under contract 3 years after this season, Enstrom only 2). Also, Vancouver seems to be kinda delusional in thinking they can compete for a couple more seasons, whereas Winnepeg will want to move cap space after re-signing Byfuglien.
Enstrom-Ristolainen
Wiercioch-Pysyk
McCabe-Bogosian
*Franson
*Juolevi
If Pysyk is gone, oh well. He's not shown to be a game changer, we can find another Pysyk.
I agree defense is the most significant area of need. I guess I just don't see Pysyks absence as a significant step back.Fair enough. We all see different things.
I'm not saying Pysyk's departure would start a downward spiral, but it would exacerbate what's already a fairly pronounced problem on the back end. Even if they don't trade Pysyk, I think they have to make some impressive moves or have some prospects overachieve to get a plausible championship defense. My comments are less about Pysyk being the savior and more about not wanting to make that any harder than it already is.
I think we'll be fine up front. From that perspective, a premier scoring winger may have less value to us than a competent top 4 defenseman. I can't see making any moves that weaken the defense until that's no longer the case.
If you trade Pysyk it would have to be for a LHD. Either part of a package or straight up. Trading Pysyk for a forward doesn't make much sense.
Also I really don't think our defense is that bad. We need a top 4 LHD but they are better than people say.
Our goaltending has been very inconsistent. Ristolainen learning to be a number 1.
Why Wiercioch?
Just like we found another Tallinder
We don't have to move Pysyk for a defensive upgrade directly. He could be used to bring in assets that then could be flipped in an effort at D upgrade.