Roster/Rumors/Speculation/Trade Talk - 2024-25: Re-Tool, Re-Group, Re-Mix, Re-Build

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Is it Sorokin or the team in front of him since Hogberg's numbers are just as good (1.45 GAA 9.47 sv%)? That said, someone better than Skarek needs to be found if Hogberg is out past the break.

I think a little bit of both. I would need to see the high danger shot statistics to really tell if the defense in front of the goalies are the difference or if it is the goaltenders themselves.
 
Judging by the feedback on the "quality" of this draft after the middle of the first round in the Trade Forum, trading Nelson for a 1st from a contender in this draft is likely not to amount to much in the long run, and trading him probably would knock us out of any shot at the playoffs -- and the revenue that would bring the team. I agree that he shouldn't be resigned to anything other than a short term, very team friendly contract, which isn't going to happen, but I won't be all that put out if we just hang on to him at the TDL.


For the billionth time...

A draft pick is no different than a player - It just an asset that has value....And can be traded again.

Nelson is already fading as a player so resigning him to 4 years at his age (much less longer) is insane...As is letting him walk for nothing on a team that's nowhere near a Cup.

You trade Nelson and get a 1st back (at least). Now you have more options, room to breathe, and figure out what you want to do before the draft. If someone offers you a great player for that 1st then package it and you deal it. No problem.

Or you ask for a 2026 1st where the draft is supposed to be much deeper.

But at some point you're going to have to draft players and get much younger, and that's where your scouts, who need to be on point, must unearth talent in any draft.

This is about creating options for getting this team younger and more talented so we can actually compete for the Cup again. Resigning Nelson or letting him walk for no assets is the opposite of that.
 
Last edited:
It makes people feel good… most of the clear contenders don’t have first rounders.
There's a reason that many contenders have punted on this year's first. Even the Rangers, when they moved their pick, made it protected up to the very specific number of 13th overall. Anyway, this is coming from insiders like MacKenzie, who speaks to scouts. From that thread, talent falls off a cliff from around pick 15-20 on, and MacKenzie went so far as to say that by the second round, you are getting a player that wouldn't go until the third in a typical draft. Top heavy to start, ass after that.
 
For the billionth time...

A draft pick is no different than a player - It just an asset that has value....And can be traded again.

Nelson is already fading as a player so resigning him to 4 years at his age (much less longer) is insane...As is letting him walk for nothing on a team that's nowhere near a Cup.

You trade Nelson and get a 1st back (at least). Now you have more options, room to breathe, and figure out what you want to do before the draft. If someone offers you a great player for that 1st then package it and you deal it. No problem.

Or you ask for a 2026 1st where the draft is supposed to be much deeper.

But at some point you're going to have to draft players and get much younger, and that's where your scouts, if they're on point, can unearth talent in any draft.

This is about creating options for getting this team younger and more talented so we can actually compete for the Cup again. Resigning Nelson or letting him walk for no assets is the opposite of that.
If the draft is as bad as they say it is by the time you get to use that contender's pick, you aren't getting squat for it, and if you draft, the odds are very high that the player's upside is Bellows. Maybe if you can get a 2026, but would that even be on the table? Some of the trade proposals I've seen floated (Casey Middlestadt and a Second from the Avs suggested by the Atlantic) would actually set the team back because of the loss of cap space.

I agree, no way should Nelson be resigned to a contract with high (or even medium) dollars and term, but even if we don't get a cup, if Nelson is seen as the difference between making the playoffs or not, I doubt the team moves him as the return won't be worth it unless some GM out there loses their mind. The bigger concern is what we do with our own pick -- I don't want it moved for the reasons you outline, but I worry that if we are in or near a playoff spot at the TDL, Lou is very likely to move it for reinforcements.
 
Detroit was red hot last year at this time then choked .

I'm sure Paul Bizz would rather see the young up and coming teams like sens and detroit stay in those playoff spots instead of isles , boston

come on man , none of those high end free agents are going to consider the isles
Definitely some Similarities to last season going on. Isles made a run right around the deadline last year to get back in it. Then they stalled out after the deadline. Big injuries.
Duclair wasn’t good to begin with. There’s a reason he’s been on 9 teams in a 11 years.

He’s the ‘good’ player on a bad team type. Contenders bite to get some depth.

When Florida signs you, then goes to the SC final, then dumps you to … SJ, only for the Florida to win it the following season. That’s a team saying ‘we need a better player to win.’ So, they cut bait.
he looks like a player with tools but no toolbox. I can see how he gets opportunities but how coaches would tire quickly.
 
Especially if the draft is


Would love for this to be a reality

That's the kind of return I could see Lou seeking - trading assets for a 25 year old, not picks/prospects. If we're sending them a young RHD though, maybe we get a sweetener?

Although, since this is Hockeysfuture I feel compelled to tweak the deal that would have us ending them Dobson and instead make it Mayfield, Engvall and a 2nd. Mayfield is from St. Louis, surely they'll do it!! :sarcasm:
 
The bigger concern is what we do with our own pick -- I don't want it moved for the reasons you outline, but I worry that if we are in or near a playoff spot at the TDL, Lou is very likely to move it for reinforcements.

I really don't see this as a possibility. With all the injured players that are likely coming back before the end of the season, that's where the reinforcements are coming from, although I mention one possibility below.

If anything, we can take on a cap dump for assets while not losing a roster player due to the possibility of LTIR with Mat.

While trying to parse details on the various injured players, it looks like Hogberg could be back after the 4 Nations. Mayfield likely too.

If Barzal is done for the season, that opens up a lot of options for gathering assets at the deadline without Nelson going anywhere. Then it becomes how well we are playing in the next 8 games to determine Nelson's fate. I have no problem with 3 x $7 million, which I'm sure Minnesota would gladly offer him. For those who are saying he's already declined, just look at his career stats across the board. The only real difference is Shots attempted/SOG's, where last year was by far his most, but this year is far more in line with his career. Shooting percentage is down about 2%, but against that he's significantly raised his FO%. He also has the most TOI of his career this year. Everything else, like blocks, takeaways, giveaways, etc., are basically in line with his career.

Palms I have no problem trading. Would prefer a young player instead of a 2025 pick. McKenzie is really down on this draft class.

As far as the rest are concerned, Pulock is kind of difficult to ascertain, but 3 days ago, the update was for Pulock and Dobson to start to skate after 4 Nations. There are 27 games after 4N, so you might be looking at 15-20 games left for both to be back. Dobson has been able to play the left side, so we might be looking at:

DeAngelo - Romanov
Pulock - Pelech
Mayfield/Boqvist/Perunovich - Dobson
or something similar.

I'm very comfortable with that and a Sorokin/Hogberg combo.

If Barzal is out, there should be something available to help fill that space. Boeser as a rental still seems like a great fit to me to fill the RW with Lee and Horvat. Maybe even entice him to stay, with Nelson and Palms leaving.

If this team keeps winning, you can't just dump everyone, there are plenty of fans that don't spend so much time here, browbeating those who won't give up the season. We have one of the best goalies in the league, and there are many instances of a low seed making a run, not just the Blues in 2019. The Panthers were the #8 seed in 2023, as was Montreal in 2021. Both made the finals.

If we start dumping players now, after this run of play, you accomplish what many were bitching about, an attendance exodus. And a likely fall off of season ticket sales. We're only 5 points out of drafting 20th or lower. In this draft, that might also be worth going for a round or two.

This team was a lot better than they started the year, as they are showing now. No need to do anything for 7 games, to see where we are.

And for those who ask, 'do you really think we can win a Cup this year?', the answer is simple. If we go 6-2 in the next 8 to get to 17-5 and continue that pace, the answer is 'why not?'.



Would love for this to be a reality


Gee, didn't I put that one out a few days ago? Dobson for Kyrou or Thomas? I get the Roger Maris asterisk if it happens . . .
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad