You're absolutely correct IMO. The one ingredient is also picking the right "young guys" and "veterans." In a cap world, spending assets and then the cap space for a guy like Pageau for instance hurts. Same with Palmieri. Not only do you take away a lottery card (1st round pick), but you're also giving up 10 million dollars in opportunity cost to bring in a younger difference maker.
Definitely understand this, although it is - as you allude to - a juggling act.
I'm sure there are plenty in the business who'd say a team like the Islanders had to add a Pageau and Palmieri the way they did because they basically can't get these kind of guys, much less better players, any other way.
We all saw what a younger difference maker like Panarin dragged this team through.
Even though I'm not sold on Romanov, those are the moves that you give high value draft picks for: a potential top 4 dman making 2.5 mil a year. But Lou hasn't done that until this season. That's the right idea, perhaps on the wrong player (hoping I'm wrong).
Yes, Romanov's circumstances are clearly different than those of Pageau and Palmieri.
He may very well prove to be better than anything we could've gotten with that 13th pick.
Furthermore, the Isles scouts seem to have strong biases towards players that can play in bottom 6 roles at the bottom of the draft. Instead of taking swings on high risk/high reward players, they take overagers like Coskey, Bibeau, etc. Minor gripe, but still my issue is with the thought process. Of course there is always a Dufour sprinkled n there. But not enough of them.
Don't get me started on this selecting of longshot overagers. And it's not a minor gripe.
Guys like Ljungstrom and Newkirk are good examples of what you're talking about in going for bottom 6 role players. Liukas too, although he's looking like a kid who can really bring a Clutterbuck dynamic with him.
As for overagers, already after Coskey and Bibeau were selected, I voiced my dismay. I just couldn't believe that two of only five picks were used on dime-a-dozen overage players like this who likely could've just been added as UFAs after the draft anyhow.
Bibeau is now out of the game and Coskey had all of 5 assists in like 25 AHL outings in his second year with the organization.
I just don't get it. It was clear from the outset that there was little to zero NHL possibility in these guys.
And now the Isles have gone a similar route this summer with Maggio and Kuefler, the latter of which no publication had on the radar. At least a few OHL people I know strongly felt someone would have to take Maggio in this draft.
But darnit, it's the exact same pattern as 2019. These kids have to be added by next summer. Heck, Lou may be convincing enough to get them to just sign AHL deals. I've gotta say though that I've seen video of Maggio and definitely see in his skating alone that this guy is not the type of player you normally think of as a future NHLer.
Don't get me wrong - they're part of the organization now and they'll be rooted for. One might surprise along the way.
But there's a pattern and it didn't work out well the first time around.
As a nice little aside, both my son and I have always liked the Canadian National Anthem. Melodically, as well as it's reverence have always struck me. I feel it's a majestic song
Anyway, after not playing since high school, my wife recently took up the clarinet again 35 years later. When my son and I came home from karate last night, she surprised us with a rendition of "O Canada" she taught herself. My kid had his Barzal hoodie on because it was raining here, and I got ready for the perverbial puck drop.
Sorry to rattle on, thought you'd get a kick out of that!
Good stuff!
And yes, you're correct... That Canadian national anthem is one of the best out there.
Majestic is a great word for it.