- Can you list me more than five players since 2010 that used their NMC clause? Now look at how many trades that took place which including a NMC clause. Players want to be wanted.
How in the world can anyone report all the players that exercised their NMC/NTC's over the years? The only people who would know that are the front office of a team, a player's agent, and the player himself. It would be like asking...List all the trades that Lou has turned down in the past 15 years.
That said I just Googled searched it and right off the bat:
https://www.audacy.com/weei/sports/bruins/linus-ullmark-reportedly-used-no-trade-clause-to-block-deal
https://www.sportskeeda.com/us/nhl/...eclining-waive-no-trade-clause-earlier-summer
However connect simple dots and you can be sure there have been lots of others that were kept very secret and thus never reported.
- I like both Stamkos and Marchessault but I find this interesting from you. Both are older players on the back end of their careers (well Stamkos more). Nothing else to say there though I would love it.
Is the reason you're surprised I would say this is because you think I'm in some sort of "rebuild or bust" headspeace? I just want to win, and this franchise is so up against the wall right now because of Lou in terms of talent level, age, lack of cap, and zero farm system that I will take any injection of top end talent that we can get - Especially when that talent has lots to give in terms of intangibles.
This "core" is so done so you need other core players from the outside (or the draft) to reshape a group that is both fading and stale. Guys like Stamkos and Marchessault would absolutely give that kind of injection if added.
- I get the vibe in your posts that you are ignoring the fact that the cap is going up close to $6 million. Not nearly as much cap would have to be sent over the Toronto. Especially if the Isles decide to trade Nelson or Palmieri.
Not ignoring this fact at all. Of course I'm hoping it goes up a lot, but we've seen this movie before where the NHL estimates what the cap might go to and then it doesn't. So first I'll wait to see if it goes to 90 million (or more).
And if it does go up 6 million that would give the Isles about 11.5 million to play with. The notable free agents are Wahlstrom, Holmstrom, Martin, Clutterbuck, Reilly, Aho, Bortuzzo, etc. Given Lou's "loyalty" to any FA you can bet he's resigning most of those guys which would erase at least half of the cap space like that. Still means that to acuqire/sign just one top talent (and the Isles truly need multiple) that a notable salary is going to have to go out the door.
If that cap goes up - That's great, and it will give the Isles notably more breathing room. Still doesn't give Lou extra picks or prospects to trade.
- When has Lou had difficulty keeping the UFA's he trades for? This is a value chance for the isles because his value will be lower.
I actually see this more as a problem that Lou won't let some unnecessary FA's just walk and save cap space. I assume you're talking about Marner in this case and if you want him, god bless. 100 points is nothing to sneeze at, but I don't want to give up multiple good assets to acquire a player who's going to ask for 11M+/year next year, has no intangibles (grit, leadership, etc), and most importantly - Whose PPG goes DOWN when it comes playoff time.