Roster/Rumors/Speculation/Trade Talk - 2023-24: Hotel California

[MJF]

What is the point of this post? Is this just to flame and poke?

Yup!

 

[MJF]

If Matt Martin is an Islander next year it will be for one reason only…for MM to play his 1,000th NHL game as an Islander. He’ll be about 40 games short when this season ends.

 

[Throttle]

Yup!

Really? I’m sorry the fans have their own minds that both players will not be resigned. However, fans are not the GM or coach…so, maybe they want to keep one or two. It’s a highly plausible scenario.

 

[MJF]

Really? I’m sorry the fans have their own minds that both players will not be resigned. However, fans are not the GM or coach…so, maybe they want to keep one or two. It’s a highly plausible scenario.

This is a bulletin board, Chris. This is what people do.

But since you seem to have the business side of the Isles down pat why don’t you give us your thoughts on your loaded question.

 

[doublechili]

Hopefully, there’s more than that, of course.

I’m not a fan of the player, but Zegras is a goner in Anaheim in the summer. Anaheim needs defense. I would trade a late pick for Montour, sign him, then flip Pulock for Zegras.

Zegras and Barzal on the same team would be a gong show, but it gets a better forward up in the top 6 and he’s not making more than his $5.75M any time soon - he’s not even worth that price.

Yeah, Zegras is one to keep an eye on. I got the vibe that it's more likely that he'd be moved at the draft than it was that he would have been moved at the TDL. Highly skilled forward, 23 years old, plays C/LW and fills an immediate and future need. It would be the Romanov move on steroids. I just don't know if there's risk that he could be a flop?

 

[SI]

Yeah, Zegras is one to keep an eye on. I got the vibe that it's more likely that he'd be moved at the draft than it was that he would have been moved at the TDL. Highly skilled forward, 23 years old, plays C/LW and fills an immediate and future need. It would be the Romanov move on steroids. I just don't know if there's risk that he could be a flop?

Zegras would be an awesome add - we need more players with his level of skill, talent, and speed.

He is young and he needs to learn how to play in the NHL.
There's always going to be a risk, but the reward would be massive.

 

[SI]

Nope, just a series question because it could happen. Maybe Roy likes Clutter and wants to keep him.

I will have generous assumptions and give my opinion.

It is very plausible that they could sign them both for one more season each at a lower cap hit.
IMO, I think it is time for the team to move on.
You would hope that both would be signed for less than 1.5 and only for 1 season - also Martin should be signed to be the 13th F.

A case to resign Martin only at a low-cap hit, but not to be regular is the other enforcers in the division - Rempe on the Rangers, Deslauriers on the Flyers, and Wilson on the Caps - they still need someone who can throw down if need be.
Cal still plays hard, but at 37, 1000 games, and now the all-time leader in hits maybe Cal wants to hang them up.

If the team does not make the playoffs, then bringing back the same exact team is NOT a good idea- even if it is a full training camp with Roy.

 

[Throttle]

This is a bulletin board, Chris. This is what people do.

But since you seem to have the business side of the Isles down pat why don’t you give us your thoughts on your loaded question.

And what I proffered is a possible likely scenario.

Never mind, let’s go back to spending time discussing buying out Engvall- that’ll be great.

 

[seafoam]

Nope, just a series question because it could happen. Maybe Roy likes Clutter and wants to keep him.

Clutter has actually been effective. You're basically bringing him back at league min to run him into the ground for 50 games so you're not rotating Fasching/Wahlstrom/etc. for 82 games.

 

[MJF]

Clutter has actually been effective. You're basically bringing him back at league min to run him into the ground for 50 games so you're not rotating Fasching/Wahlstrom/etc. for 82 games.

By all means, let’s run back a couple of players, mascots actually, who have been here for 15 years and haven’t won squat.

 

[Arsenalogist24]

Stockholm Islanders

 

[Throttle]

Yeah, Zegras is one to keep an eye on. I got the vibe that it's more likely that he'd be moved at the draft than it was that he would have been moved at the TDL. Highly skilled forward, 23 years old, plays C/LW and fills an immediate and future need. It would be the Romanov move on steroids. I just don't know if there's risk that he could be a flop?

For the Isles to have a successful offseason, to me they have to acquire a strong player via UFA, then trade a marketable player like a Pulock for an upgrade somewhere else. That’s the Vegas Way.

I’m not into Zegras. He got NFL’d in the sense the marketing came at him quick and he’s kinda a one trick pony, talented, sure, but I think you can do better with Pulock’s cap hit for his performance.

 

[Glorydays22]

Hopefully, there’s more than that, of course.

I’m not a fan of the player, but Zegras is a goner in Anaheim in the summer. Anaheim needs defense. I would trade a late pick for Montour, sign him, then flip Pulock for Zegras.

Zegras and Barzal on the same team would be a gong show, but it gets a better forward up in the top 6 and he’s not making more than his $5.75M any time soon - he’s not even worth that price.

I don't like Zegras. He seems like a very selfish and a "Me" player. Not a fit for us.

 

[eoin92]

I don't like Zegras. He seems like a very selfish and a "Me" player. Not a fit for us.

Perfect fit for the Rags, reportedly he grew up as a fan

 

[Glory Days]

Pinto is my target. I wonder if Ottawa wants to pay him. They need a few changes to their lineup.

 

[SI]

For the Isles to have a successful offseason, to me they have to acquire a strong player via UFA, then trade a marketable player like a Pulock for an upgrade somewhere else. That’s the Vegas Way.

I’m not into Zegras. He got NFL’d in the sense the marketing came at him quick and he’s kinda a one trick pony, talented, sure, but I think you can do better with Pulock’s cap hit for his performance.

Pulock is not going to waive his NTC - it is unlikely that happens.

 

[SI]

Clutter has actually been effective. You're basically bringing him back at league min to run him into the ground for 50 games so you're not rotating Fasching/Wahlstrom/etc. for 82 games.

I would rather go younger. I think bringing in someone who can throw down - Mattheiu Olivier would be a good Cal replacement; it would have to be a trade of some kind to do that, but I think also signing Trenin would be ideal.
Trenin - Cizikas - Olivier with Maclean and Fasching as the extra F's

 

[Osakahaus]

Nope, just a series question because it could happen. Maybe Roy likes Clutter and wants to keep him.

i would rather them not keep both and still employ them on the PK. Clutter is fine for a year more. Martin? He's cooked.

 

[Throttle]

Pulock is not going to waive his NTC - it is unlikely that happens.

Are you his agent? Most players waive their NTC, once a team tells they want to trade, they’ll bend - the team just told that player that don’t want them.

 

[SI]

Are you his agent? Most players waive their NTC, once a team tells they want to trade, they’ll bend - the team just told that player that don’t want them.

Can LL shop Pulock and then ask him and his agent when he has a deal in place? Sure, but it's very, very unlikely.
Especially, when LL resigned him for 8 years.

It is so difficult for GMs to make trades and hockey trades for that matter and now add in a NTC - its just another hurdle and obstacle. Can it happen? Sure. But, not likely.

 

[Isles72]

Yeah, Zegras is one to keep an eye on. I got the vibe that it's more likely that he'd be moved at the draft than it was that he would have been moved at the TDL. Highly skilled forward, 23 years old, plays C/LW and fills an immediate and future need. It would be the Romanov move on steroids. I just don't know if there's risk that he could be a flop?

I can see Lou trading the 1st for him akin to the Romanov trade . He's signed for 2 more years at 5.75 then RFA so theres plenty of runway to see how he'd mesh . Lou approved haircut , no-nonsense coach in Roy who dislikes inapropriate goal celebrations and would probably bench him for a missed michigan

 

[Lek]

I would rather go younger. I think bringing in someone who can throw down - Mattheiu Olivier would be a good Cal replacement; it would have to be a trade of some kind to do that, but I think also signing Trenin would be ideal.
Trenin - Cizikas - Olivier with Maclean and Fasching as the extra F's

I think Maclean can be a full time, "cheap" 4th liner and do well there. Not sure about his ability to enforce, but certainly plays with an edge to his game. I would see him as a fulltime, not extra.

like Trenin's, stat line...does he play wing? or just center. Do not watch preds or avs

 

[mm11]

I would rather go younger. I think bringing in someone who can throw down - Mattheiu Olivier would be a good Cal replacement; it would have to be a trade of some kind to do that, but I think also signing Trenin would be ideal.
Trenin - Cizikas - Olivier with Maclean and Fasching as the extra F's

Didn't Olivier pound rempe as well a few weeks ago? Nice to see history there.

 

[The Real JT]

Martin was an ill advised signing 4 years ago and the same goes for Clutter 2 years ago. Since then, and particularly this year, they have both regressed.

How could resigning either of them at any price be a good idea?

Their two roster spots are better filled by younger players on near league minimum contracts. Take a flier on a couple of guys. They might not even be players currently in the organization. No offense to our two warriors but projecting their play into next season tells me that moving on couldn’t be much worse and the ceiling for moves like those I suggested is undoubtedly higher.

 

[PK Cronin]

Martin was an ill advised signing 4 years ago and the same goes for Clutter 2 years ago. Since then, and particularly this year, they have both regressed.

How could resigning either of them at any price be a good idea?

Their two roster spots are better filled by younger players on near league minimum contracts. Take a flier on a couple of guys. They might not even be players currently in the organization. No offense to our two warriors but projecting their play into next season tells me that moving on couldn’t be much worse and the ceiling for moves like those I suggested is undoubtedly higher.

I agree with you, but keeping one of them for league minimum as the 14th forward is the only scenario in which they should be brought back. I'll be pissed at any other scenario that has them set as a regular or both of them on the roster.