So if Jenner is the be all and end all of leaders why do the Jackets suck? Asking for a friend.
I'm not seeing anyone suggesting this. What I'm seeing is that a very young team, with a lot of first-pro-contract players, has a better chance of growing into a group of productive players (i.e. a good team) if there is someone around to provide an example of what goes into becoming a productive player. Boone is definitely that. It's why, despite the fact I have been questioning Boone's leadership/captaincy, I have not been on here advocating trading him.So if Jenner is the be all and end all of leaders why do the Jackets suck? Asking for a friend.
I view Jenner as Captain by default. Who else would you choose on the current roster?So if Jenner is the be all and end all of leaders why do the Jackets suck? Asking for a friend.
Captain Boone JennerI view Jenner as Captain by default. Who else would you choose on the current roster?
By all accounts (Torts/former teammates) Jenner is a pack your lunch bucket, show up to work each day and give 100%-the leader by example type. He's certainly not a rah rah type and doesn't exude much personality and is way too low key for my taste in leadership. But, once again, who do you replace him with on the current roster?
Fantilli would be my pick to succeed Boone. When would the best timing be for him to assume the Captaincy (assuming that my impression of him as a leader is correct)? I don't know. If there is massive change in management in the off season, he may get the "C" as early as next season. Or there could be a trade/signing which would bring in another potential Captain.
But for the time being, BJ is the appropriate leader of the BJs. Had to type that.
ThanksThe short version is that on HFAvs (on all team boards, actually) it's at their discretion, but outside of that, it's a no-no without admin vetting, and that one isn't admin vetted.
Yes, that means that technically we could have non-vetted folks here at HFCBJ chatting about such things so long as it doesn't spread beyond that. In practice, I think it causes too many issues elsewhere (blame my short stint modding TR&FA, if you want to blame something specific) and so I personally insist on admin vetting. I don't get to tell HFAvs how to run their shop, tho.![]()
Monahan does not impress me as a potential mentor any more than, say, Duchene would.He probably wouldn’t ever sign here but if you could trade Boone and sign Pavelski in UFA, I think that would be a good leadership swap.
Monahan could also be a cheaper more realistic UFA leadership choice.
If the swap was 2024 1st + A Prospect + pick + Monahan (UFA) for Jenner I think that might be worth it. Especially if you can use the 2024 1st to acquire another proven player (preferably on defense, assuming Provorov is traded).
I know he’s a winger, but I’d even be interested in seeing what Reilly Smith would cost from Pitt. He cost Pitt a 3rd to acquire, does Roslovic + Cuelemans get it done? Not sure. Would be some insurance before Brindley is ready. Might need to move Laine at that point though.
Hypothetical:
Gaudreau Fantilli Marchenko
Johnson Monahan Voronkov
Chinakhov Sillinger Smith
Texier Kuraly Danforth
Doesn’t look that bad to me (I tried to balance the lines).
Pán Boh zavaruj a zlé preč.He probably wouldn’t ever sign here but if you could trade Boone and sign Pavelski in UFA, I think that would be a good leadership swap.
Monahan could also be a cheaper more realistic UFA leadership choice.
If the swap was 2024 1st + A Prospect + pick + Monahan (UFA) for Jenner I think that might be worth it. Especially if you can use the 2024 1st to acquire another proven player (preferably on defense, assuming Provorov is traded).
I know he’s a winger, but I’d even be interested in seeing what Reilly Smith would cost from Pitt. He cost Pitt a 3rd to acquire, does Roslovic + Cuelemans get it done? Not sure. Would be some insurance before Brindley is ready. Might need to move Laine at that point though.
Hypothetical:
Gaudreau Fantilli Marchenko
Johnson Monahan Voronkov
Chinakhov Sillinger Smith
Texier Kuraly Danforth
Doesn’t look that bad to me (I tried to balance the lines).
So do you agree on Pavelski?Monahan does not impress me as a potential mentor any more than, say, Duchene would.
skús sa uvoľniťPán Boh zavaruj a zlé preč.![]()
Hertl at 8+ million until age 37 seems like not a very good idea to me. Way too much money IMO. I think Laine is more valuable than that contract.Random thought bouncing around my head.
We've got lots of wings and could use a little Dubi 2.0. So I was trying to think who's like Dubi and isn't mid 30s already. And I came up with Hertl. So I was wondering if something around a Laine for Hertl swap could be built. SJ is just starting their rebuild, Laine is 5 years younger and on contract for 3 years less. He can either bridge to the next core or fit the next core better. Probably need some balance (maybe a center).
Thoughts?
Random thought bouncing around my head.
We've got lots of wings and could use a little Dubi 2.0. So I was trying to think who's like Dubi and isn't mid 30s already. And I came up with Hertl. So I was wondering if something around a Laine for Hertl swap could be built. SJ is just starting their rebuild, Laine is 5 years younger and on contract for 3 years less. He can either bridge to the next core or fit the next core better. Probably need some balance (maybe a center).
Thoughts?
So do you agree on Pavelski?
Monahan has been a captain everywhere he’s gone, but ok. You can go all the way back to his draft profile and find work ethic and leadership as strengths. Help me to understand why you are comparing a guy who has battled back from two hip surgeries to play at a high level this year (and earn a trade to a contender at the TDL 1st + 3rd) to Duchene (a 55+ point player) who was so bad of a locker room cancer that Trotz bought him out with 3 more years left? Keep in mind, Monahan also was able to learn from a great captain - Giordano. Can you provide justification as to why Jenner is a much better mentor? Assuming you can, at what point does the difference in leadership/mentoring become overlooked given a valuable return in a trade? 2 1st you’re willing to take Monahan instead of Jenner? 3 1sts? Is there no limit?
I think a slower 2 way forward that had success in the NHL, would be great mentor for someone like Johnson.
skús sa uvoľniť
Idk man, he’s gotten Selke votes at least - gets a lot of takeaways. I’m not trying to statistically upgrade on Jenner with Monahan. Neither are long term C here. Heck, Monahan can play LW for all I care. I’m saying the franchise might be better off with 2024 1st + A prospect + secondary asset AND UFA Monahan as a replacement for the veteran leadership lost moving Boone, rather than having Boone here for 2.5 years. Everyone wants for this team to be better. Well maybe trading Boone, using the assets to fix other holes, and being smart in UFA can lead us towards being competitive sooner.I wouldn't compare Monahan to Duchene, but he's not usually been much of a two way player, and kind of a soft player at times, perhaps because of his injuries. He's not tough like Boone. I see him as somewhat of a marginal upgrade on having Voronkov as 2C. Maybe a downgrade actually, he has a lower scoring rate at 5v5, lower than Sillinger as well. He's mostly been dependent on the PP.
A little bit more, and you can take a state exam in Slovak. Because even the sentence structure and inflection are correct.skús sa uvoľniť
Now nobody gives up Laine for more than a 2nd round and an average player and even in this I 'm not sure.I don't know much about Hertl's leadership - is he known as a very vocal leader?
I'd rather have Hertl than Laine right now but I think we'll be able to unload Laine's deal this summer without taking back Hertl's contract, I'd rather not have either one.
Idk man, he’s gotten Selke votes at least - gets a lot of takeaways. I’m not trying to statistically upgrade on Jenner with Monahan. Neither are long term C here. Heck, Monahan can play LW for all I care. I’m saying the franchise might be better off with 2024 1st + A prospect + secondary asset AND UFA Monahan as a replacement for the veteran leadership lost moving Boone, rather than having Boone here for 2.5 years. Everyone wants for this team to be better. Well maybe trading Boone, using the assets to fix other holes, and being smart in UFA can lead us towards being competitive sooner.
Who knows, maybe he even helps the PP
I like Jenner and would be fine with him being a CBJ lifer, but I think the conversation around moving him makes some sense to (at least) explore.
with the amount of talent we have on this team. this team needs to make a big splash in the off season IMHO. package a few of our talented guys and picks and get a Brady T ( maybe he gets sick of losing ? this is a reach ), mittelstadt or konecny i truely believe were one really good player/ leader away from being a top team for a long timeI would consider other moves if we can get an appropriate contract with someone in UFA. Maybe we can get a deal on a Lindholm-Gaudreau reunion, or maybe a Monahan reunion (I would be less enthused). Maybe we luck out with a Reinhart or Pavelski. But I don't want to sell on Boone and then go into UFA desperate to patch a hole in our leadership, and then oh shit we just paid Monahan a 6 x 6.
"Using assets to fix other holes" - what did you have in mind? I'm not seeing how we use the assets. It seems like we already have a lot of this level of asset - numerous high performing prospects, more than we could ever roster. Could we use some of them instead? Like being a bad hockey team isn't necessarily an asset problem, the Jackets should already be exhibit A for that.
I do recall reports saying the Jackets gave him a call after he left San Jose. He respectfully said no and didn’t want to leave the western conference. So I imagine that won’t be any different.He probably wouldn’t ever sign here but if you could trade Boone and sign Pavelski in UFA, I think that would be a good leadership swap.
YesWe missed our opportunity to get a great leader with winning pedigree, and still effective - and he's a C.
Ryan O'Reilly.
He would have been a perfect pick up for this team.
We literally traded a 1st rounder to get Provorov last offseason, which was a (failed) attempt at patching holes. Trading a 1st is more valuable to a rebuilding team than Boone Jenner."Using assets to fix other holes" - what did you have in mind? I'm not seeing how we use the assets. It seems like we already have a lot of this level of asset - numerous high performing prospects, more than we could ever roster. Could we use some of them instead? Like being a bad hockey team isn't necessarily an asset problem, the Jackets should already be exhibit A for that.