Unsustainable
Seth Jarvis has Big Kahunas
i was considering it a sign/tradeThat's the point. There are only guesses.
Also, CLB couldn't do 8Y as an extension, only 7.
i was considering it a sign/tradeThat's the point. There are only guesses.
Also, CLB couldn't do 8Y as an extension, only 7.
Possibly, but the reports said he wasn't interested in talking extension WITH CLB, so I don't think the Canes were planning on a sign and trade from what I could see.i was considering it a sign/trade
And we don't know:
1) it was 4th OA straight up for Necas. I suspect Carolina would have been adding more to that deal.
2) That Waddell didn't say something like "Only if this player isn't there when the pick comes", which is the player they drafted.
A lot of factors not really known.
The conflict between the side of me that says "Don't feed this" and the side that says "I know this one!" has been fought and decided:Am bored, so speculating in fantasy land…
Now that Necas and then Canes have settled prior to an arb hearing, when does the buyout window open…48 or 72hrs after settling?
I ought to start a Kotkaniemi buyout rumor on X and see how far it goes…
i dont believe we qualify. Neither Drury nor Necas had a arbitration hearing for a settlement or award to be had which is a requirement for the arb buyout window.Am bored, so speculating in fantasy land…
Now that Necas and then Canes have settled prior to an arb hearing, when does the buyout window open…48 or 72hrs after settling?
I ought to start a Kotkaniemi buyout rumor on X and see how far it goes…
Hmmm…pretty sure this came up last summer or summer before. I believe this is incorrect. Teams get a second buyout window regardless of actually going through the arb hearing. Timing depends on when a settlement is reached, either before or after hearing.i dont believe we qualify. Neither Drury nor Necas had a arbitration hearing for a settlement or award to be had which is a requirement for the arb buyout window.
im not sure THN is right here.Hmmm…pretty sure this came up last summer or summer before. I believe this is incorrect. Teams get a second buyout window regardless of actually going through the arb hearing. Timing depends on when a settlement is reached, either before or after hearing.
FYI, a recent link to lend some credence to the above:
No arb hearing for Wahlstrom, but they still evidently had a window
Just couldn’t recall if it was 48 or 72hrs after settlement
Granted not the best link, but first one that popped up.im not sure THN is right here.
I think they amended in the recent MOU that you can't anymore settle after the hearing.Timing depends on when a settlement is reached, either before or after hearing.
yepI think they amended in the recent MOU that you can't anymore settle after the hearing.
Salary Arbitration
• Salary Arbitration briefs shall be limited to: 1) 42 pages(exclusive of indices, glossaries, tables of contents, andexhibits), and 2) size 12-point Times New Roman font,double-spaced, one-inch margins (except charts, tables,headings, footnotes, citations)
.• A Salary Arbitration matter may not be settled after the hearing has commenced.
(c) The notice of termination shall be effective if given in the form attached as CBA Exhibit 20, with a copy to the NHLPA and Central Registry as follows:
(i) beginning the later of June 15 or forty-eight (48) hours after the conclusion of the Stanley Cup Finals and ending at 5:00 p.m. New York time on June 30; and
(ii) For Clubs who have Club or Player elected Salary Arbitration filings pursuant to Article 12, within the forty-eight (48) hour period beginning on the third day following the later of: (i) the Club's receipt of its last salary arbitration award; or (ii) settlement of its last case (provided such award was received or such settlement occurred prior to 7:00 p.m. New York time; awards or settlements that occurred or were received at or after 7:00 p.m. New York time will be deemed to have occurred or received the following business day for purposes of this provision).
By settlement I mean prior to arb hearing, I suppose anything after would be technically an “award”I think they amended in the recent MOU that you can't anymore settle after the hearing.
Thanks, confirms my understandingThe SPC paragraph 13 says that the settlement of the last arbitration case opens the 2nd buyout window. So looks like the act of anyone filing for the Arb does automatically mean a 2nd window (unless team-elected and the player gets an offer sheet):
Tage Thompson broke out at 24 after being an afterthought, on the lower end Sam Bennett broke out at 25 after being written off in Calgary.Does anyone have any examples of late bloomers they can share to give us a glimmer of hope that Kokomiami may have another gear?
Couterier or Erickson Ek maybe?Does anyone have any examples of late bloomers they can share to give us a glimmer of hope that Kokomiami may have another gear?
He has to want it. Aho should have sat him down by now and explained to him how the Canes operate; (required conditioning and commitment level to play Canes hockey). he looked tentative last season. Very easy to see why RBA gave up on him.Does anyone have any examples of late bloomers they can share to give us a glimmer of hope that Kokomiami may have another gear?
On the flip side he’s much stronger on his skates and no longer falls down every time he has the lightest body contact with anyone. He looks much stronger overall so I think there’s been buy in, I think his confidence has taken a hit and he’s probably struggling with becoming a 40-50 checking center mentally when I’m sure he thinks he’s capable of more. Rod wants him to be Staal, KK seems to want to be a mix of Staal and Aho.He has to want it. Aho should have sat him down by now and explained to him how the Canes operate; (required conditioning and commitment level to play Canes hockey). he looked tentative last season. Very easy to see why RBA gave up on him.
We're trying to make a trade eh...
Does anyone have any examples of late bloomers they can share to give us a glimmer of hope that Kokomiami may have another gear?
He had a decent first HALF season..Depending on if the Jackets see Fast as potentially playable this year, I wonder if Columbus might be interested in him for a small pick. The Canes have Carrier to play Fast's role on the bottom-6 now, and depending on what Jarvis' 8 year contract comes to be, the Canes could use that extra $2.4M. Have a free-for-all in training camp to see which one of Jost/Suzuki/Nadeau/Blake/Unger Sorum/Veteran PTO wins the last spot in training camp (I could see the Canes giving JVR a PTO; he had a good season in Boston and is an OGWAC).
"completely cooked"He had a decent first HALF season..
from everything I've heard he was completely cooked the last half of the season and was pretty much useless