Identity404
I'm not superstitious, but I am a little stitious
Must have a lot of free time then. Dundon should have to pay for thatHe goes around saying hello to all staff and asking how their days are going. Top notch guy.
Must have a lot of free time then. Dundon should have to pay for thatHe goes around saying hello to all staff and asking how their days are going. Top notch guy.
Sounds like he’s ready for gov’t workMust have a lot of free time then. Dundon should have to pay for that
The Ol reverse J Staal trade from JR eh?Maybe Don W will trade KK to CBus and take over there.
There's zero chance they were dealing Necas for a 1+ year goalie.Could have just been talk, but man, I hope, Necas wasn’t part of the return for such a deal:
I can't express how much i hate this type of quote.Could have just been talk, but man, I hope, Necas wasn’t part of the return for such a deal:
Board rule is you have to tell us the name of your fantasy team before we answer.Hey gang.
Question for you guys.
If Necas is moved, can you see Jarvis ending up at C next season? He took quite a few draws last season, so maybe Rod is grooming him a bit for that?
Thanks!
I think trading Orlov is unlikely for a couple of reasons:I wonder if Skjei signs long term, we consider trading off Orlov? We could use those 7.75M of cap savings to acquire a cheaper 3rd pairing LD and use that money left over to help sign Guentzel.
We could also acquire some nice draft currency if we move Orlov. Having him as a 3rd pairing D is a luxury.
How do we feel about Hronek as a main piece coming back in a Necas deal? I don't know much about him.
But did you do it Dulcimo.. (Bad Italian.. See True Lies!)I've been banging the drum a bit about how the return for Necas should be for a RHD when you consider the Pesce situation. Hronek makes a bunch of sense.
I've been a fan of Jarvis since his WHL days.Board rule is you have to tell us the name of your fantasy team before we answer.
I've been a fan of Jarvis since his WHL days.
Also, Atlantis Egos.
Hronek makes sense, yeah, but not when he’s apparently dead set on making $8M on his next contract.I've been banging the drum a bit about how the return for Necas should be for a RHD when you consider the Pesce situation. Hronek makes a bunch of sense.
Something centered around Lysell?The Bruins would be an interesting partner for a Necas trade- Necas wants to be a center, the Bruins are quite weak down the middle. Necas won't like playing in that system though, just like he doesn't like playing in ours. He may just have to get over that and learn that the NHL isn't pond hockey, but I digress. The Bruins have enough defense that they would likely be confident that they can insulate Necas's defensive mistakes, and he's an opportunity to get them that offensive pop down the middle they're seeking. I can see why he'd be a guy they target.
Who would we want back is the question. Brandon Carlo to fill that RD spot? I don't think we'd be going after Ullmark at this point.
How do we feel about Hronek as a main piece coming back in a Necas deal? I don't know much about him.
Sounds like a drop in replacement for Necas, not in the good way.Something centered around Lysell?