- Jul 16, 2005
- 14,857
- 13,012
Reading between the lines, I think this situation is a lot more nuanced than one side or the other deserving the blame and it’s really difficult for any of us to do anything other than speculate about what happened.
The Rangers now have somewhat of a recent track record of having issues with top prospects (Andersson and now Kravs) and Kravs also seems to have some entitlement/maturity issues.
It could just be bad luck drafting 2 kids who had higher expectations about their roles than they were ultimately given. Or it could be that the organization has the wrong approach. Most likely, it’s a little of both. Lias and Krav probably weren’t given the opportunities they maybe deserved and definitely expected. But at the same time, guys like Chytil, Lundkvist, Jones, Schneider, Barron, Shesterkin, all took their medicine and played in the AHL before being given a real NHL opportunity.
I agree.
But even if it is organizational bad luck, the organization can't just take the position that the best way to run your team is to set hard and fast rules with no exceptions ever made. First of all, that's not how Gen Z kids respond anymore. That's not to say there shouldn't be rules that are maintained, but professional athletes in the 21st century do not respond to this kind of tough love as well as prior generations did, and wishing that they did won't change it.
Second of all, that's not the best way to run a team, ie, they are just wrong. These are professionals being paid millions of dollars. They don't all have to love each other in the locker room. You can't have Georgiev sucker punching Tony DeAngelo, but if some of them think Kravtsov is a spoiled brat being shown some favoritism, too f***ing bad, they'll get over it. Kakko and Lafreniere aren't losing their spots to him. And I could care less how Dryden Hunt feels if he gets demoted because of Kravtsov.
Third of all, the team has to think about more than this year's locker room and regular season outcome. In this, too many fans are lapping up the 'win now' kool-aid with the owner, apparently, being the biggest buffoon of all. The most successful organizations in pro sports have proven to be the ones that can take advantage of the other teams by playing the systems in their favor. That means asset management is literally more important to year-over-year success than anything else. The Rangers turned Kravtsov into an asset of zero value with their reaction, so they are flat wrong there in their stewardship of the franchise's assets as a duty to the fans to put out a winning product every year. They chose the "this year," over the "all years," and that's the cumulative low-value choice that makes any other year harder as has been proven again and again with all their win-now moves over the decades. They've learned nothing, which isn't surprising given it's still the same owner.
in b4 someone says "you must not manage people in a group," -- because I do.
Last edited: