1 - Miller at 50% doesn't force Strome out.
Yes, it does. The market for Strome is at least what Miller currently is getting. Even at that, plus Miller at 50%, we do not have enough cap space to ice a full team if Strome gets 5.5m, which is probably on the low side in this market anyway.
It's not happening.
It's either Strome or Miller.
Unless you are moving Kreider or Trouba.
3 - If the cost to trade for Miller is Lundkvist, Kravtsov, and a 1st, that doesn't wipe out the Rangers assets for future deals.
Yes, it does. You need Othmann to be a Kreider replacement eventually, you need Jones and Robertson to win those 3rd pair spots in the next year or two so we can stop trotting out Nemeth and Tinordi. Is Cuylle and Berard the foundation of a trade for a star center now? Come on.
And frankly we need those kids too, so we can get Reaves and Hunt off the roster.
The "extra," pieces we have are Nils and Kravtsov and/or Chytil. They need to become a long term center, not an 18 month center.
4 - The Rangers are on on pace for 112 points. Adding a PPG C like Miller to this team would obviously improve the Rangers play at 5v5 for the next 2 playoff runs. You don' t need to be delusional to think that group of forwards with Igor and our D core could compete for a cup.
Miller would have to somehow magically transform three lines to give them a fighter's chance. Their point pace doesn't interest me. They have played far too many games looking like garbage where Igor steals them points. They aren't winning a Cup like that.
When they actually play like a good team and have Igor playing at a high level, then they will be a contender.
And Miller doesn't improve the team for 2 runs, because Strome walks after the first one and we are right back where we stand today.
When do you expect the Rangers to have more talent than they would have with Miller for those 2 runs?
I expect the Rangers to not be idiots and trade their best remaining assets for 18 months of no upgrade. Blisteringly high expectations, I know.