Can anyone speak French here?
indications are that Kreider will be dealt if he doesn’t have a deal in place.
Nothing earth shattering.
Can anyone speak French here?
All things being equal, Makar is a much, much better defender.Can't think of a more similar player to DeAngelo in the league right now than Makar, makes no sense for the Avs.
Not everyone shares your low expectations. ADA is so overrated on this Board its laughable. He makes too many bone head plays for my liking even though he can move the puck.
I can't believe there's still talk of trading ADA. We have literally been waiting for 20 years for a D-Man like him. And the first year we have one, we're going to trade him?
Y'all really too lazy to click into the tweet and hit the translate button?
Probably all hinges on the UFA/rental market. Same as the Rangers themselves with ADA/Lemieux/Strome all hinging on Kreider.I’m a little surprised we haven’t heard any rumblings about players who are RfA’s at the end of the year whose teams may not be able to afford them being available more
if you consider being the 6th highest scoring dman in the league and leading a rebuilding team to the 7th best pp in the league as 'low expectations' then LOL
you consider the idea of moving ADA if you can turn him into a top forward cause with trouba, fox and lundkvist the blueline can absorb that loss to get the big upgrade up front. the idea that we should move him cause he isn't good is a complete clown take
Lavoie does change the wording up between his French/English posts, yes. But the message is the same.I got a different translation lol
People are as dumb as dog shit!I can't believe there's still talk of trading ADA. We have literally been waiting for 20 years for a D-Man like him. And the first year we have one, we're going to trade him?
A 60+ point puck moving RD? What are your expectations, Brent Burns?
Y'all really too lazy to click into the tweet and hit the translate button?
What kind of sauce we talking here? Nice marinara? Maybe buffalo wing sauce?My sauces also say that if the Rangers don't extend Kreider he'll likely be traded.
I know there is the non-analytic based crowd, but the eye test and the analytics are lining up.
Of course there are moves to make, but the team has been on a good run the last two months and progression is being made internally.
Losing Kreider and Fast will hurt, but there is a chance that, depending the return, good hockey and winning could continue without these guys around.
If they do re-sign Kreider and keep Fast, I'd say that this current squad will give teams a run for their money the next 6 weeks and getting in is a distinct possibility
Where's Carlos Beltran's niece when you need her.
Many of the complaints about analytics have at least been attempted to be addressed and I think they do a lot better of a job than they did even just a couple of years ago. They’re still viewed too monolithically by “proponents” of them, but that’s a different problem and one I don’t think is really affecting teams.
That being said, declaring the rebuild over would seem to bely the whole thing about sample sizes. They’ve been improving and things look bright, but the rebuild is NOT over yet.
To the point you’re making in your commentary there, I actually agree that the impact of trading Kreider or Fast isn’t as big as people want to proclaim. It’s perfectly possible to become a contender without them.
With Trouba, Fox and Lundkvist I think we need more two way top pairing LD than ADA (one of our 3 small offensive RDs). His stocks are very high. It is good moment for selling him for a very nice return.
What is an alternative? Playing with Skjei, Staal at top4 D? We have plenty LD prospects but none of them is expected to be top pairing LD. I think It can be extremely difficult to get a top LD in the next 2-3 years. Trading ADA could solve that problem.