True Blue
Registered User
- Feb 27, 2002
- 30,092
- 8,362
I don't think girardi, zucc, or Mac is anywhere near the status of hankJust like the Rangers wouldn't buy out Girardi, and wouldn't trade Zuccarello or McDonagh. If the last 4 years have taught me anything, it's to never rule anything out under Gorton
They are really in a tough position with Henke. The hope is that he probably chooses to retire after all this. Same probably goes for Staal. But that is a lot of money to walk away from.I don't think girardi, zucc, or Mac is anywhere near the status of hank
Im not advocating that it isn't a good idea I just don't know if they will do it, in my opinion they would buy out Staal before hank but I don't even know if they do that either
when it comes to hank he could walk away from that money and still make that back by doing a movie hahaThey are really in a tough position with Henke. The hope is that he probably chooses to retire after all this. Same probably goes for Staal. But that is a lot of money to walk away from.
$8m is an awful lot of moneywhen it comes to hank he could walk away from that money and still make that back by doing a movie haha
but seriously he is a legend in Sweden I doubt the money will just stop coming in all together, I also think the rangers would be willing to give him whatever he wants
His salary is $5.5 for next season (yes, still a lot of money).$8m is an awful lot of money
His salary is $5.5 for next season (yes, still a lot of money).
I don't think there's any way he can keep his 2020-21 bonus if he doesn't play the 2020-21 season.4.5 mil left after july 1st and he gets his bonus
I don't think there's any way he can keep his 2020-21 bonus if he doesn't play the 2020-21 season.
the bonus gets paid on 7/1 regardless of the season. thats why the bonuses are buyout and lockout proof...he just would have to retire after the bonus is paid.
I think the bigger question for Hank is that he isnt done competing at a high level. He has to decide if he can wait for an opportunity like an injury to come back in and win for us, re-establish himself, or is it better to go to another team and do it there, or to just go back to Sweden for his twilight years. I really doubt he's going to retire just because were in a cap crunch.His salary is $5.5 for next season (yes, still a lot of money).
I don't think there's any way he can keep his 2020-21 bonus if he doesn't play the 2020-21 season.
too much tuff for one teamIf DeAngelo won't agree to a reasonable deal what about trading him for a forward (Maybe Kyle Clifford?) and then turning around and (if healthy) signing Byfuglien to a short term deal? It'll help slot Trouba back in where he's comfortable, give us a bomb of a shot on the backend, bring in a mean tough guy who can play and also get us another forward to help supplement the offense.
If DeAngelo won't agree to a reasonable deal what about trading him for a forward (Maybe Kyle Clifford?) and then turning around and (if healthy) signing Byfuglien to a short term deal? It'll help slot Trouba back in where he's comfortable, give us a bomb of a shot on the backend, bring in a mean tough guy who can play and also get us another forward to help supplement the offense.
It feels different to me still. If there's a season to play and Lundqvist chooses not to play it, I can't see him being able to keep those dollars.the bonus gets paid on 7/1 regardless of the season. thats why the bonuses are buyout and lockout proof...he just would have to retire after the bonus is paid.
Signing bonus is paid out in July, he can retire after that
what is this obsession with Kyle Clifford? he would need to be a throw in for any deal that includes ADA, I mean Clifford sucksIf DeAngelo won't agree to a reasonable deal what about trading him for a forward (Maybe Kyle Clifford?) and then turning around and (if healthy) signing Byfuglien to a short term deal? It'll help slot Trouba back in where he's comfortable, give us a bomb of a shot on the backend, bring in a mean tough guy who can play and also get us another forward to help supplement the offense.
what is this obsession with Kyle Clifford? he would need to be a throw in for any deal that includes ADA, I mean Clifford sucks
his career high is 21 points for gods sake.....hes a 4th liner at best, unless Clifford is coming with Marner I want no part of him AT ALLLLLLLL
Upside- he's a UFA making less than 1 mill, so assuming it isnt a joke that his name keeps getting mentioned, we dont have to trade ADA for him. Just sign him.what is this obsession with Kyle Clifford? he would need to be a throw in for any deal that includes ADA, I mean Clifford sucks
his career high is 21 points for gods sake.....hes a 4th liner at best, unless Clifford is coming with Marner I want no part of him AT ALLLLLLLL
Would ADA be enough for Clifford?If DeAngelo won't agree to a reasonable deal what about trading him for a forward (Maybe Kyle Clifford?) and then turning around and (if healthy) signing Byfuglien to a short term deal? It'll help slot Trouba back in where he's comfortable, give us a bomb of a shot on the backend, bring in a mean tough guy who can play and also get us another forward to help supplement the offense.