UAGoalieGuy
Registered User
Trade with retention >>>>> buy out. Cap savings + asset(s) + you know not having to buy out arguably the best goalie to ever put on a Rangers sweater.
let's just wait until Hank announces he wants to be on a playoff team. hopefully he thought about that this past weekend
That's what's paid to Lundqvist (on the base salary, not the cap hit), but the calculation for the cap hit is more complicated.
around the net, this is what I got
“A buyout is pretty simple – he would be $5.5 million on the books next season and then $1.5 million the season after.”
To be fair - at the time, it was insane for Shattenkirk to agree to four years. But it happened.I mean, has this ever happened? Kreider is a smart dude and kind of odd, maybe he’d be cool with doing the team a solid, but I feel like it’s a bigger solid than people realize. You’re asking him to temporarily move, fit in with a new team with new people, and then compete during the grind of the playoffs (which he won’t get paid for,) just to get the team a draft pick.
That was Cal Foote not Nolan Foote
Many moons ago Keith Tkachuk did.
I forgot his name, but didn’t that Arizona center that was traded to Chicago return to Arizona? French name.
I'd really like to hear a Kreider and Geo to the Avs for one spectacular item.
Would you be satisfied with Byram OR newhook alone, nothing else added.I'd really like to hear a Kreider and Geo to the Avs for one spectacular item.
So is Andersson going by the deadline or more likely the draft?
we couldn’t have gotten Steve Foote if we asked nicely
Would you be satisfied with Byram OR newhook alone, nothing else added.
Put me on that list as well. Either of those players can step in next year and fill a need. Forget the pick.Would you be satisfied with Byram OR newhook alone, nothing else added.
Would you be satisfied with Byram OR newhook alone, nothing else added.
You'd move them for Shane Bowers?!?If Henrik and Kreider were going to Colorado the prospect better have a last name starting with "B" or "N"
Colorado has very little money coming of the books and Burakovsky and Zadorov will get raises. Jost is a RFA. After next season Landeskog is a UFA and Makar a RFA.
I wonder if they feel that they have the cap space to take on someone like Kreider long-term and/or Hank for another year.
If Kreider said to his agent, "I'm thinking of going short term to be a team player for the rangers", exhibit A from the agent is Shattenkirk and why that is out of the question. Kreider can make his choice, but that loyalty might not be a 2 way street. Shattenkirk could have gotten another 3 years at $6.5m. I doubt he makes that up in the rest of playing days.To be fair - at the time, it was insane for Shattenkirk to agree to four years. But it happened.
Trade with retention >>>>> buy out. Cap savings + asset(s) + you know not having to buy out arguably the best goalie to ever put on a Rangers sweater.
From Hanks POV, retirement > buy-out. If Hank retires after the signing bonus is paid — how much money does he loses vs a buy-out? He just gets 2/3 of 4.5m with a buyout right. So it’s 1.5m vs 3m.