Even if the Leafs attached Kapanen or Johnsson to Marleau, I think those guys are both looking for $4M a piece on a bridge deal. That's a lot to absorb just to buy a guy out.
And NYR have their own overpaid players so I can’t see taking Marleau
Even if the Leafs attached Kapanen or Johnsson to Marleau, I think those guys are both looking for $4M a piece on a bridge deal. That's a lot to absorb just to buy a guy out.
And NYR have their own overpaid players so I can’t see taking Marleau
Even if the Leafs attached Kapanen or Johnsson to Marleau, I think those guys are both looking for $4M a piece on a bridge deal. That's a lot to absorb just to buy a guy out.
I wouldn't be doing any favors for these cap strapped teams. The phone lines would be open for a massive over payment to help them a little but not to the point it prevented me from filling out my team.
Patience produces trades like the one yesterday. The rumor about the salary cap not going up as expected just makes the cap space a team has a bigger asset so use it wisely.
I’m a bit fuzzy on how a buyout works if the other team holds salary. For example, if Toronto retains $1.5m in cap and trades him to the Rangers who buy him out, that would be a $5m cap hit for the Rangers? Is that right?
If Gorton felt safe enough in his position, the smart play moving forward this offseason is to begin accumulating more future picks. The team has a bunch of young players ready or very close to ready. Get some future picks to spread out the young talent coming in.
Namestnikov for a 2020 2nd
Vesey for a 2020 3rd + 2020 4th
At some point there won’t be enough roster spots for all the young talent
Its not about punishing him. Its about not punishing us more than we've already punished ourselves with him.Still confused--so Smith shat the bed and you don't care about him--he can sit in the press box twiddling his thumbs while collecting his $4.35 mil each of the next two years (I don't know how he'll live with himself!) and that's going to be some kind of punishment for his underwhelming his contract?--meanwhile his potential replacements might not be good enough--so if they're not are you going back to playing the guy you say has been ****ting the bed? (Do you expect him to stop ****ting the bed?)---and meanwhile you're going to fuss and worry about whether we have enough cap space when you have a perfect opportunity to save cap space by buying him out? Have I got that right?
Its not about punishing him. Its about not punishing us more than we've already punished ourselves with him.
Here's the audio from the Kyper interview where he talked about Marleau:
June 18: The latest on the Toronto Maple Leafs and Mitch Marner - Sportsnet.ca
Starts at 1h30m. He doesn't think the Leafs would trade Nylander.
Talks Rangers a little bit:
- Hosts brought up Panarin and the JD connection. Kyper doesn't think they'll be in on Panarin. They seem to be doing the rebuild for real and prefer being slow and patient. Florida will get first crack at Panarin and Bob as a package.
- Floated that there's a rumor of the Rangers offer-sheeting Marner.
He's a sensationalist pundit, but it's something to talk about from a guy who has some Rangers connections.
Just to add to more stuff/speculation, Bobfather says that there has been a ton of chatter on Kreider.
Mentioned towards the end of the latest Bobcast.
we can sit them both. But FWIW, Staal gets the harder matchups, and I don't think its fair to compare those since Smith has been playing as FIf you want to stop punishing the Rangers, He isn't the guy to sit.
I think this is coming; down to an either or...
Either
The Rangers sign Panarin (and buyout Smith plus deal away at least one veteran forward)
Or
They make 2-3 smaller signings, deals to absorb bad contracts etc.
Probably not enough wiggle room in the system to do both