Toggle sidebar

Speculation: Roster building thread XLIX ”U Can’t Always get what U Want”

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Status
Not open for further replies.
jas said:
You know, @Edge gave us a rundown this morning of who exactly the Rangers have been talking to, and the situations they’re monitoring. He did the same last night. I’m sure there are clues in those posts. And, you’re going to have to do the work yourselves.
Click to expand...

Well, can we conglomerate all his posts into one post so we don't have to go egg hunting?
 
Putting the clues together. I'm thinking it's Edmonton ?

4 or 5 pieces. Edge said we would inhale at first--so we're most likely going start by saying really, and OK maybe not so bad. Edge also said he could live with it. 25 year old player involved.

Buch and ( 25 year old--which most of us don't want to give up ) Shattenkirk ( retaining 25% )
For
Lucic ( inhale--aka why )
Pulji
8OA

5 pieces

Edmonton pays to get rid of Lucic 2 years earlier then Shattenkirk. Money we retain on Shattenkirk can pay for Buch's raise.

We get Pulji whom maybe if he gets his head out of the sands of Edmonton can put up some good numbers.

Cap room is not a problem as Staal Shattenkirk's retention and Smith all come off the books to pay the last 2 years of Lucic--maybe even a buyout somewhere down the road.

Last the joy of the 8OA pick.

Now going completely crazy tomorrow we deal CK at the draft for additional first rounder.

3 picks in the top 15 picks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FIRE DRURY
All right guys..

Look for the cookie crumbles..

BBK said something about “Heating Up”.

Arizona has the 14th OA. Vegas has the 17th. Flames? Nah...

Why am I thinking picks though..? Edge mentioned 4-5 players..

So maybe it’s not a pick?

Goddammit!

giphy.gif
 
  • Like
Reactions: Brooklyn Rangers Fan and Leetch3
howztheglass said:
Putting the clues together. I'm thinking it's Edmonton ?

4 or 5 pieces. Edge said we would inhale at first--so we're most likely going start by saying really, and OK maybe not so bad. Edge also said he could live with it. 25 year old player involved.

Buch and ( 25 year old--which most of us don't want to give up ) Shattenkirk ( retaining 25% )
For
Lucic ( inhale--aka why )
Pulji
8OA

5 pieces

Edmonton pays to get rid of Lucic 2 years earlier then Shattenkirk. Money we retain on Shattenkirk can pay for Buch's raise.

We get Pulji whom maybe if he gets his head out of the sands of Edmonton can put up some good numbers.

Cap room is not a problem as Staal Shattenkirk's retention and Smith all come off the books to pay the last 2 years of Lucic--maybe even a buyout somewhere down the road.

Last the joy of the 8OA pick.

Now going completely crazy tomorrow we deal CK at the draft for additional first rounder.

3 picks in the top 15 picks.
Click to expand...
You beat me!
 
I'm hearing the Rangers are trading Kaapo Kakko for Zion Williamson, but apparently Kakko doesn't want to play for New Orleans...mainly because there isn't a hockey team down there.
 
howztheglass said:
Putting the clues together. I'm thinking it's Edmonton ?

4 or 5 pieces. Edge said we would inhale at first--so we're most likely going start by saying really, and OK maybe not so bad. Edge also said he could live with it. 25 year old player involved.

Buch and ( 25 year old--which most of us don't want to give up ) Shattenkirk ( retaining 25% )
For
Lucic ( inhale--aka why )
Pulji
8OA

5 pieces

Edmonton pays to get rid of Lucic 2 years earlier then Shattenkirk. Money we retain on Shattenkirk can pay for Buch's raise.

We get Pulji whom maybe if he gets his head out of the sands of Edmonton can put up some good numbers.

Cap room is not a problem as Staal Shattenkirk's retention and Smith all come off the books to pay the last 2 years of Lucic--maybe even a buyout somewhere down the road.

Last the joy of the 8OA pick.

Now going completely crazy tomorrow we deal CK at the draft for additional first rounder.

3 picks in the top 15 picks.
Click to expand...

@Edge said that the Rangers are getting no interest in Shattenkirk even at 50% retention. I’m guessing that includes going to Edmonton, which is likely a team he won’t approve a deal to.
 
howztheglass said:
Putting the clues together. I'm thinking it's Edmonton ?

4 or 5 pieces. Edge said we would inhale at first--so we're most likely going start by saying really, and OK maybe not so bad. Edge also said he could live with it. 25 year old player involved.

Buch and ( 25 year old--which most of us don't want to give up ) Shattenkirk ( retaining 25% )
For
Lucic ( inhale--aka why )
Pulji
8OA

5 pieces

Edmonton pays to get rid of Lucic 2 years earlier then Shattenkirk. Money we retain on Shattenkirk can pay for Buch's raise.

We get Pulji whom maybe if he gets his head out of the sands of Edmonton can put up some good numbers.

Cap room is not a problem as Staal Shattenkirk's retention and Smith all come off the books to pay the last 2 years of Lucic--maybe even a buyout somewhere down the road.

Last the joy of the 8OA pick.

Now going completely crazy tomorrow we deal CK at the draft for additional first rounder.

3 picks in the top 15 picks.
Click to expand...
You had it wrong right at the top. He said a less than 25 year old roster player.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom