LaffyTaffyNYR
Registered User
- Feb 25, 2012
- 17,113
- 2,662
Then why didn't Calgary trade him if he was still that good (for his age)
No he isn't.
He's not Norris level anymore, but he's still good.
Idk about that, Strome outproduces him substantially and is 2 years younger. Buchnevich has FAR more value than Gourde though and there should be a big add if they were trading Gourde for Buch, let alone us adding Strome lmao
Honestly think it'd be pretty cool to get Gio.
He's a thousand years old but he's still a quality player.
I'd bet Buch to Seattle for Gourde and D. Be that Gio, Zadorov or Soucy.
Then why didn't Calgary trade him if he was still that good (for his age)
See here's the thing, we really have no need for a D like Giordano. Sure he's a vet but a vet that hasn't won anything AND we have Lindgren-Miller deadlocked for our top 2 LHD. Gio doesn't make any sense at the moment tbh
Maybe but, considering we still don't have the Rangers pick it seems to hold water.There's also still the possibility that they just end up taking Blackwell and Carp wants clicks.
Remember Buchnevich for Horvat?
Remember when Kovalchuk was a done deal?
LMAO PitlickStrome for Gio at 50%+ Pitlick would be ok with me.
He's a year younger than I am so let's go easy on that.
There's also still the possibility that they just end up taking Blackwell and Carp wants clicks.
Remember Buchnevich for Horvat?
Remember when Kovalchuk was a done deal?
And just to clarify; if it isn't Strome going the other way (or Buch, I guess), then sure, I don't mind it. Giving up Strome for Giordano would get a huge F in my book.
In a heartbeatWhat if it's Buch + 15 for Gio + 2?