Speculation: Roster Building Thread XII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
St Louis might not have had two 1Cs, but their 1C won the Conn Smythe and they were deep enough at C to run Bozak as 3C.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mas0764
agreed Gourde has to be a target w Goodrow likely in

Tampa likely has a side deal though

It should be a 1st plus...everyone here ready to give 1st this year plus a jones type player..Kraken should not undersell Yanni
 
I mean, with his usage he hasn’t gotten a lot of chances to score goals
I think it’s more he isn’t considered reliable defensively and has taken some dumb penalties often

Offensively he has done what people would want of him considering usage I think
I can't agree. He played with Chytil more than a third of his ice time last season. What opportunities should he get before producing anything?
 
Lets get back at Tampa and trade for Yanni...sign Coleman along with Barclay..Tampa North..3rd line

1) Yes, we set them up with Cally, G$, and McD. And they aquired Boyle and Stralman. Back scratched, time to call in the favor.

2) About time we aquire groomed talent from winners instead of perennial losing cultures such as CBJ and AZ. One minor but psychologically significant pet peeve I've had with management over the years.
 
  • Like
Reactions: zukeisgone
I mean Strome is older, but 15 could entice AZ and maybe a defensive prospect, it could be an overpay but Strome is a year from FA (AZ could sign him to reach the cap floor) Dvorak has a solid contract for a 2C here.. could even expand it to include Garland (who is also rumored to be going out)..

Dvorak + Garland price = Eichel and certainly a lesser cost to get it done.

again, just spitballin
The cost of acquiring him would be less then Larkin/Lindholm/ Eichel. He would be an upgrade over strome at everything except scoring pts. He has untapped offensive potential. We have trade history with the Yotes..... tell me I’m wrong?
I really doubt he’s not at least a 60pt center with the breadman, most likely more, while playing a solid game everywhere else on the ice including the dot. Why would that be bad??
Come on Drury, get Dvorak/ Crouse for the home team
 
The cost of acquiring him would be less then Larkin/Lindholm/ Eichel. He would be an upgrade over strome at everything except scoring pts. He has untapped offensive potential. We have trade history with the Yotes..... tell me I’m wrong?

maybe but he's also better on face offs, better defensively and if he gets 15 to 20 points playing with Panarin you're looking at a 60 point 2 way center signed for 4 more years at 4.5

so maybe my offer was too high for him, but I like him as a target. I know people mention Chytil as well, but he would also have to improve his 2 way game and face offs to get to that level, could he? possibly he is young enough. Its could also be he is better as a winger.
 
Whats a realistic return from Ottawa for Strome? I doubt they're giving up 10 overall and Norris is a obvious no. so...?
If we can get Pinto that’s a coup.
The Norris stuff is just mainly a joke cause it would be like Zibby 2.0 Odds are it’s a late 1st and ok prospect or a guy like Pinto straight up
 
Unless you actually value defense.
Jack Eichel's shots against numbers were amazing though. It was the same deal with Hughes on the Devils and our Lindgren-Fox defensive pairing: control the play with the guy on the ice, clown show with the guy on the bench.

I think the assessments of how this team needs a ton of "defensive forwards" are a little off. Going long on Ryan Strome was probably never a great idea. Getting a vet bottom six forward like Goodrow to PK and win puck battles is a good idea if it's not one of those day one stupid bottom six contracts. But it's becoming a monomania around here.
 
1) Yes, we set them up with Cally, G$, and McD. And they aquired Boyle and Stralman. Back scratched, time to call in the favor.

2) About time we aquire groomed talent from winners instead of perennial losing cultures such as CBJ and AZ. One minor but psychologically significant pet peeve I've had with management over the years.
Reminds of when Neil Smith was criticized for trading for so many ex-Oilers. “What do you want me to do? Trade for Sharks and Senators?”
 
Still not giving up Schneider who has consistently every year gotten better and Kravy who i admit, im in love with lol for DVO. Hes a #2/#3 tweener. Again Kravy is a top 20 prospect in the LEAGUE. If we can get Larkin who is a top 25 center for the 15th and Kravy. Then why do you believe DVO is worth more than him? Garland sure as hell doesnt make up the difference since he will be a UFA after this upcoming season.

If you want DVO that bad the most id offer is Jones and the 15th, Not a penny more. I dont think he has the talent offensively to be a 2nd line center. But again thats a different story.
Don’t think it cost Schneider unless your trying to get Garland as well. They will ask for chytil. Younger, cheaper replacement who could be better in time, but is not currently. I don’t care about the metric numbers. Dvorak plays with shit wingers on an offensively inept team, against every other teams best D pairs
 
Jack Eichel's shots against numbers were amazing though. It was the same deal with Hughes on the Devils and our Lindgren-Fox defensive pairing: control the play with the guy on the ice, clown show with the guy on the bench.

I think the assessments of how this team needs a ton of "defensive forwards" are a little off. Going long on Ryan Strome was probably never a great idea. Getting a vet bottom six forward like Goodrow to PK and win puck battles is a good idea if it's not one of those day one stupid bottom six contracts. But it's becoming a monomania around here.

Eichel is better defensively than he gets credit for...Zibanejad the opposite.
 
Still wonder if Buffalo retains a small % to get a return they're comfortable with.

Could you imagine having both Eichel and Zibanejad at around 8 a pop?

Who knows, anything is possible in this world
If you think they are going to retain, with skinner on the books that long still, prepare to lose Kakko in that deal
 
Panarin Cirelli Kravtsov
Panarin Danault Kravtsov
Panarin Larkin Kravtsov
Panarin Chytil Kravtsov

or does someone else make the move to center? Kravtsov or a Barron? Ideally size, speed and good 2way ability. Each player listed only has 2/3 of those. Kravtsov arguably has all 3 IF, massive IF, he could ever make that transition.
 
Is it plausible to think as I mentioned yesterday that maybe multiple dominoes set up here.
Such as

-Tarasenko and Gourde to Rangers giving Seattle whomever. Tarasenko takes place of Buch and or Kravy

- Which ever left between Kravy Buchy also go via other trade along with others part of the 2c trade

-Strome for rough tough vet dman

- sign Coleman

Laffy-Zib-Kakko
Bread-mystery center-Tarasenko
Kreider Gourde- Coleman
Barron-Goodrow-Rooney

-I know Goodrow should be on that left side of Gourde- but Kreider can't be a 4th liner.-

Lindy-Foxy
Touba-Miller
Lundy- new guy (Soucy/ Oleysiak) the latta of course being FA meanimg strome brought back something else.

So while I can't pinpoint the trades it becomes do these players plus our pick(s) have enough juice to bring back players above as well a the imaginary ones basically a pool of:

-Buch
-Kravy (who I so do not want to trade)
-Strome
- Jones
-Georgey
- Robertson
- 1st rounder this year
-other picks
 
Panarin Cirelli Kravtsov
Panarin Danault Kravtsov
Panarin Larkin Kravtsov
Panarin Chytil Kravtsov

or does someone else make the move to center? Kravtsov or a Barron? Ideally size, speed and good 2way ability. Each player listed only has 2/3 of those. Kravtsov arguably has all 3 IF, massive IF, he could ever make that transition.

Tampa is not trading Cirelli. There is no evidence this is even a thing. Find me a link.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Michal
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad