bleedblue94
Registered User
- Jun 8, 2004
- 9,926
- 11,014
It's not semantics. I'm specifically talking about beating a goalie clean with a quality shot. That's what I'm talking about when saying that he does not have one and none of them have above average shots. Referencing shooting percentage has absolutely nothing to do with that. Why are we so afraid to actually acknowledge faults and areas of improvement for these guys rather than constantly just pretend like they're better than they are. Or are we just going to blame the coaches for the reason why the players can't get off good shots and actually beat goalies who are set cleanly? Every other team in the playoffs has somebody or multiple players that can actually beat the goalie cleanly on a shot and don't need to make 40 passes in order to do it. People complain all the time that the Rangers overpass in order to create offense, does anybody actually stop and think that maybe that's because they don't have pure shooters that can actually beat goalies with their shot and instead they need to pass their way into goals and that's a big reason why they struggle to score in the playoffs when those kind of passing plays are not available? It's not a bad thing to actually objectively criticize the group to identify such issues, but even with the denial, this group does not have any above average shooters on it other than the two guys I mentioned and one of them doesn't even want to shoot the damn puckSemantics. Finishing is putting the puck in the back of the net regardless of how it gets there. Chytil was 4th on the team in goals and 8th in average ice time among forwards, without a bloated shooting percentage. As long as he's healthy there's a 30+ goal center staring right at us. Roope Hintz broke out at 24, thats what I envision next year for Chytil (age 23).
Guys in beer league pull off bs goals and they don't have the ability to do it with any consistency. 2 goals in three years is nothing to really reference. It's known as reeeeaching for positivity bc what's staring us in the face is so disappointingYes, that's why I specifically used the phrase "FLASHES of highlight reel skill." You saw the two goals at least, so you know where I saw it. You can't do that once if you don't have the SKILL to do it, never mind TWICE, so the skill is there. It's a matter of seeing if it will ever be more than flashed.