RangersFan1994
Registered User
- Aug 20, 2019
- 19,173
- 15,824
Pass. I seriously doubt that he will be a center at the NHL level. He's not even playing center in the Q. On top of that, his discipline issues are a concern, and his offensive production didn't really improve this year. A torn muscle in his hip and a career low shooting percentage of 10.6% probably contributed to that, but he only played 46 games this year and missed all of the playoffs while rehabbing the injury.How about this
Rangers get C Zachary L’Heureux
Preds get D Nils Lundvkvist
How about no?How about this
Rangers get C Zachary L’Heureux
Preds get D Nils Lundvkvist
Barring a trade or unexpected offer sheet, Kakko should re-sign and plug a hole at RW. One person with knowledge of the situation told lohud.com, part of the USA TODAY Network, that a bridge deal similar to Chytil's two-year, $4.6 million contract is a good ballpark figure.
Dagoon has hacked Ola's accountBook it.
You think Dagoon knows how to steal passwords? Maybe he paid some Russian guy.Dagoon has hacked Ola's account
Difference is Key improved in his sophomore season. Kids a future top pair defenseman fresh off a great season. Why bring him downI like Key a lot based off what I’ve seen and the progress he’s shown, but a bunch of the same things were said about Brady Skjei after his first year. Size, good speed, offensive prowess (Skjei had a 40 pt rookie season), could carry the puck pretty well and even take the puck end to end for offense. He flat-lined/regressed the following year when he was asked to do more on the top pairing (if memory serves me right). The Rangers inexplicably gave him a big deal after that, which was highly risky the second it was signed because they didn’t have a good idea which direction his career was going after that season.
Miller’s positioning improved throughout the year, particularly since January or so, but it is still a bit suspect especially in the DZ. Not unlike Skjei’s issues. There’s still at least some level of doubt in my head about which way Miller will go. Where KAM differentiates from Skjei is he had been asked to do more as the season progressed and seemingly elevated his play, so there’s some good hope this isn’t Brady Skjei part two, but I think we have to pump the brakes a touch…
I take Trouba over Skjei 11 times out of 10. Even with contracts considered. Trouba is good. Skjei is not good.If we are discussing Skjei's NYR legacy, I think it's relatively balanced. Sure, he didn't progress as expected, but he was pretty much a net neutral on that contract we gave him. I think of him as pretty much a decent #3 or great #4.
Trading him was a fair deal for both parties.
The debate could be whether, had we not traded for Trouba and kept Skjei instead, how our defense would look. But we didn't know at that point just how good Fox was going to be and Trouba was dealt for with an eye towards giving us a true #1 all situations RD.
Lundkvist for a center or LHD. The Rangers don't need wingers. Panarin is signed for 4 more seasons. Kreider is signed for 5 more seasons but his NMC expires in 2 years and most of the money will paid off after the the 4th year. The Rangers have Lafreniere, Kakko and Kravtsov. Assuming Kravtsov isn't traded which isn't happening. He would have been traded by now if some team made a good offer. Nothing is changing now. Kravtsov's waiver exemption is over. He will be on the team. The Rangers have Othmann waiting in the wings.
The Rangers don't need another RHD. Trouba will be here for another two seasons. At least two seasons. Fox. Schneider.
LHD. Can the Rangers trade for a young LHD who can compete for a spot on the Rangers this season or play in the AHL this season? Lindgren is signed for two seasons. He has one more season after this contract before group III. The Rangers don't have anyone to replace Lindgren. The Rangers have a bigger cap crunch in 2023. If the Rangers wanted to clear money in the summer of 2023 by trading Lindgren, they will need someone to take those minutes.
The Rangers could have traded Lundkvist to Montreal for Lehkonen at the trade deadline but they couldn't afford Lehkonen's next contract. Lehkonen is getting $4M in his next contract. He has been very good for Colorado in the playoffs. Vegas traded Brannstrom to Ottawa for Stone and they signed Stone to an extension.
The Rangers could have traded Lundkivist for a high end rental/expiring contract but they couldn't afford to keep that player.
Drury can't trade Lundkvist for an expensive player because the Rangers don't have the space for the player. The cap will be flat for 22-23 and 23-24. Maybe it goes up starting in 24-25.
As an example. The Rangers could afford JT Miller this season but they can't afford another $8.5M-$9M contract on their books. Miller will get at least 6-7 years at $8.5M-$9M in the summer of 2023.
Drury is in a tough spot. It's not his fault.
Have to think Lundkvist plus something can get you to Necas. He might do better here with our high octane wingers.
They can’t.Have to think Lundkvist plus something can get you to Necas. He might do better here with our high octane wingers.
LA isn’t doing this either. LA has enough of an ELC glut. If they are trading their centers, they are going to be cashing it in on an established NHL player. They have no reason to do prospect for prospect.Id rather trade Lundkvist to La for one of their C prospects
People will rip him too for Buchnevich. What did you want the guy to do? Gorton and Davidson signed off on three massive deals for Kreider, Trouba, Panarin. They had to lock up a 1C and a 1D. He traded a solid offensive wing for a Cup winning, 25 year old winger with more upside than he’s shown in St. Louis that plays the game a way you need to come playoffs. It’s a shame he was hurt. However, he will still get torched. You can’t just trade him for another star or high potential player you will need to re-sign down the line. Fans don’t get it. Sure, could he have asked for a first? Sure, but does that help them now over the roster player? The Blues had a great season.Lundkvist for a center or LHD. The Rangers don't need wingers. Panarin is signed for 4 more seasons. Kreider is signed for 5 more seasons but his NMC expires in 2 years and most of the money will paid off after the the 4th year. The Rangers have Lafreniere, Kakko and Kravtsov. Assuming Kravtsov isn't traded which isn't happening. He would have been traded by now if some team made a good offer. Nothing is changing now. Kravtsov's waiver exemption is over. He will be on the team. The Rangers have Othmann waiting in the wings.
The Rangers don't need another RHD. Trouba will be here for another two seasons. At least two seasons. Fox. Schneider.
LHD. Can the Rangers trade for a young LHD who can compete for a spot on the Rangers this season or play in the AHL this season? Lindgren is signed for two seasons. He has one more season after this contract before group III. The Rangers don't have anyone to replace Lindgren. The Rangers have a bigger cap crunch in 2023. If the Rangers wanted to clear money in the summer of 2023 by trading Lindgren, they will need someone to take those minutes.
The Rangers could have traded Lundkvist to Montreal for Lehkonen at the trade deadline but they couldn't afford Lehkonen's next contract. Lehkonen is getting $4M in his next contract. He has been very good for Colorado in the playoffs. Vegas traded Brannstrom to Ottawa for Stone and they signed Stone to an extension.
The Rangers could have traded Lundkivist for a high end rental/expiring contract but they couldn't afford to keep that player.
Drury can't trade Lundkvist for an expensive player because the Rangers don't have the space for the player. The cap will be flat for 22-23 and 23-24. Maybe it goes up starting in 24-25.
As an example. The Rangers could afford JT Miller this season but they can't afford another $8.5M-$9M contract on their books. Miller will get at least 6-7 years at $8.5M-$9M in the summer of 2023.
Drury is in a tough spot. It's not his fault.
Who are you trading Lundkvist for that we can afford for more than one season? It has to be a draft pick or ‘another team’s developing young player’. Or do you play Lundkvist on his off side, further diminishing his already low trade value?Why are we trading for another team's developing young player, who is a better W than C, when we already have plenty of our own? If were trading prospects it should be for a center we know is good
There were better returns out there. Plus, that Goodrow contract didn’t write itself.People will rip him too for Buchnevich. What did you want the guy to do? Gorton and Davidson signed off on three massive deals for Kreider, Trouba, Panarin. They had to lock up a 1C and a 1D. He traded a solid offensive wing for a Cup winning, 25 year old winger with more upside than he’s shown in St. Louis that plays the game a way you need to come playoffs. It’s a shame he was hurt. However, he will still get torched. You can’t just trade him for another star or high potential player you will need to re-sign down the line. Fans don’t get it. Sure, could he have asked for a first? Sure, but does that help them now over the roster player? The Blues had a great season.
Why are we trading for another team's developing young player, who is a better W than C, when we already have plenty of our own? If were trading prospects it should be for a center we know is good
No you’re right. Let’s let Lundkvist wither on the vine in Hartford. We can chalk it up to an embarrassment of riches and absolve ourselves of any responsibility to develop future team depth.The young forwards already here can’t get minutes and people want to trade for Necas![]()
I think if that were in the cards and the NYR were interested, it would have happened by now.Id rather trade Lundkvist to La for one of their C prospects