That's obviously not exactly true, but generally speaking, a guy grabbed at #3 has much higher odds than a guy passed on until hes at #8.
You are looking at stats with blinders on as the basis of your opinion. You state that those picked 4-6 mostly do not play on the top pair. The fallacy here, among others, is that the whole argument goes to hell if a team takes him at 3. According to you, then his chances at being a top pairing defenseman jump dramatically. Byram's abilities stay the same, but his chance of being a top pairing defenseman increase with his drafting position?
When you have multiple armies of scouts passing on a kid, there's usually a reason. Of course some drafts are exceptional, but 2019 isn't one of them. If Byram drops, there is a reason.
Since we are debating the type of prospect he is now, what multiple armies have passed on him? You have not contributed a single thing as to your view, aside from telling you what stats say.
I suspect armies of professional scouts who do this full time know more than guys online who all read the same few scouting reports and maybe saw some clips.
Two things. First of all, can you site just a few of the armies that have stated that Byram does not project to be a 1D? Second of all, you have no idea if I just read on here, or just watch a few clips, or maybe read a few reports, or maybe read reports and do a good deal of watching like most others here.
Sometimes teams make mistakes and reach when they shouldn't. But if 7-10 teams pass on a kid, odds are theres a reason for it.
Oh, that's rich. So now, if a team likes him and takes him at a slot that belies your argument, that team is making a mistake and reaching. Got it.
Btw, most 3 overall draftees do NOT become first line/pair players.
Then perhaps your range should not have been 4-6.
According to you, the great majority of top line players and top pair defensemen in the league today have gone either 1OA or 2OA. That is a rather astounding statistic.