Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XXXIII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Definitely not a trade that'd be worth it for the Rangers to match, but Tampa's got all the reasons in the world. Blackhawks did well for themselves too. There's no way they should've traded Hagel for less than this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanielBrassard
Hilariously bad trade for Tampa for a guy whose production is due to a 22% SH%. Could have used those first picks on rentals this year and next year (or for two of them) for far better players.
 
Expensive price to pay for Hagel.. but he is young anyway and Tampa should be going all in every year, so probably not a horrible move. It's unlikely either of those late 1st rounders amount to what Hagel is today within 5 years from now.
Its that he's young and on a really good deal for his production for 2 more years after this.
 
Tampa still has their 1st for 2022 however...

1647629868488.png
 
Well if his shooting regresses to the mean, he'll score like 15 goals a year. So...
Yes, because the controls are the same? Tampa Bay = Chicago?

He'll be on a top6 on a much better team with a much more potent offense. His shot% will drop but his point totals will probably increase.
 
Hagel is going to end up replacing Palat on line 2 next year. Unless Palat takes a discount, he's out of there. They don't have the room to keep him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: I Eat Crow
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad