Kravtsov should be our deadline RW addition.
pretty sure even if that miracle happened he's in the KHL till the playoffs
Kravtsov should be our deadline RW addition.
I wouldn't put Robertson in there at all, he's very likely a staple of this d going forward.
I’ll say that part of the reason this team struggles so mightily at 5v5 is because the 3rd line has largely been a black hole this season. Solve that and the teams numbers start to rise. Go get a good 3rd liner and define that line’s role. We’ve seen what defining the 4th line has done for them. The 3rd line is close to there if deployed properly.
Panarin-Strome-Chytil
Kreider-Zibanejad-Kaako
Lafreniere-Goodrow-Jarnkrok/Lehkonen
Hunt-Rooney-Reaves
It’s not as ‘sexy’ as adding a Radulov or Pavelski but I really don’t think adding a guy who will also need PP time is the correct course. Solidify the lines, continue to develop chemistry between pairs and groups over the next 15-20 games.
Wouldn't doubt that's where the repressed memory came from.Trav "The Tractor" with longish hair? Is this Krav on Traktor with longish hair's evil twin?
pretty sure even if that miracle happened he's in the KHL till the playoffs
evolving hockey has a decent compare. It's not free.Question;
Whats the best site to use to compare players from an advances stats perspective? Also, are they free or do you need to pay for them?
Trade for Lehkhonen
Lekhonen Barron Goodrow
I think they'll play a simple yet effective game.I have no idea if this trio would generate any offense.
If they can, that could be a great matchup line. If they can't, then its basically a 90's style checking line which doesn't really help us.
I wouldn't put Robertson in there at all, he's very likely a staple of this d going forward.
Yes. This is clear. We can’t score at even-strength. And I’d say the reason is the team in general looks like it’s waiting for a lucky break or a power play. And otherwise, they’re content to focus on defense. It’s working now but it’s not going to work in the playoffs. They need much more even-strength urgency and fight.
The good news is that if I can see it, Gallant surely sees it. Hopefully it’s reparable.
evolving hockey has a decent compare. It's not free.
Who you trying to compare?
So when then? Are you moving panarin out?I don’t want to tear it all down. I want to move out certain pieces until the future is secured. So that means we aren’t gonna win a Cup this year or next, bfd, we aren’t going to anyway.
So when then? Are you moving panarin out?
I've got him sitting somewhere in purgatory between the primary NYR prospects and secondary NYR prospects. Similar mid tier with Morgan Barron.
He's a staple if he progresses over the next 2 years to the NHL and Lindgren shows signs of wear and tear or Jones is dealt. There might be a spot for him then. But there's also the very real possibility that Miller, Jones, Lindgren have that side of the defense locked in for the next 5-8 years.
There is a difference between young forwards and young d men.Playing these guys on a second or third pairing isn’t sink or swim. Fox, Lindgren, and Nemeth, would all still be here.
I don’t see the risk of ruining them. I see the risk of losing games, but if we can sit here and say we want to see Jones-Lundkvist on the third pairing then I can certainly also say I want to see Miller-Schneider on the second pairing.
This idea that these young kids are gonna get ruined is outdated 1980s hockey thinking. Young kids play and excel in the pros all the time.
I'm asking you, would you trade panarin in your scenario?When did I ever say move Panarin out?
Choking the game 5v5 and using goaltending and a superhot PP to win is the exact recipe for success Tampa used to win the Cup.
You think we're Tampa? Not close.
We may not be TB, but given our roster makeup it isnt the worst model to run with, again simply based on what we have strength/weakness wise.You think we're Tampa? Not close.
I didn't say we are Tampa. I said Tampa used that approach to win, and now GG is using that approach to good effect during the regular season. Nobody is saying that we are perfect as we are, if I need to spell that out for some people.
That approached worked for Tampa because they were a strong team with no holes in it. Thats not us