Believe what you want, but
@Edge indicated that there was an offer out there from LA that many people (including myself) view as better value than the deal Drury ended up making.
With the idea being that he sacrificed value because he was specifically lusting after Blais.
Agree or disagree with this as you see fit, but "Drury sacrificed raw value in the Buch trade" is not a completely far-fetched take that should be met with snark and dismissal, IMO.
there’s no way in hell they were offering Kupari and 8OA.
Edge Did mention kings were in the mix with Kupari+1st, who knows what kind of conditions were on the pick??
They may have also pulled their offer after signing Danault, more likely after trading for Arvidsson.
we also have no clue how our scouts and GM view Kupari or his ceiling. They might feel he’s a smaller worse version of Chytil.
If either of those things was the case, I could see why they viewed Blais higher. He’s cheap, can produce offensively, and provided the style of play we sorely lacked. He was also the only piece of the 3 that couldn’t have started making an impact immediately.
That point can’t be underestimated, if the rangers were going to miss the playoffs again this season, it would have been a massive failure with the talent we have.
Maybe Drury countered with Villardi + 1st??? Maybe the deal fell thru when they were able to acquire arvidsson cheaper???
Too many things we don’t know.
Buch had also been shopped around for at least 2 seasons prior as well. I know they tried like hell to move up for Zergas.
They also had a done deal with the oilers until CBJ went off the board and chose PLD.
In a different universe, Both Buch and Kreider are gone and NYR either has Newhook and Keller or maybe Robertson + Zergas?? And a late 1st???