Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XXX

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
So can anyone tell me how Hajek has played? Reason I'm asking is they seem to be doing a lot to keep him in the organization, i admit i like what he potentially brings to the table, size, skating, his reach etc. Are they thinking he has the tools and now they just need him to play and gain confidence in the AHL, maybe work with him a bit. I'd have thought they'd have cut bait with him by now, even if i see his potential myself and am happy they haven't yet it just seems un ranger like and i have to admit it's poo or get off the pot time with him. Anyone watch him play much this year?
 
So can anyone tell me how Hajek has played? Reason I'm asking is they seem to be doing a lot to keep him in the organization, i admit i like what he potentially brings to the table, size, skating, his reach etc. Are they thinking he has the tools and now they just need him to play and gain confidence in the AHL, maybe work with him a bit. I'd have thought they'd have cut bait with him by now, even if i see his potential myself and am happy they haven't yet it just seems un ranger like and i have to admit it's poo or get off the pot time with him. Anyone watch him play much this year?
He's played not at all, aside from a conditioning stint. Will keep you informed.
 
Agree with your Trouba sentiment but I like how you mentioned Trouba, Kreider and Strome in a sense that the Rangers can’t keep at least one of them as soon as 22-23 season, so the Rangers are forced to choose. Pretty obvious that Trouba is not going anywhere yet so it’s between Kreider and Strome.

They honestly can’t move Trouba until Schneider gets a solid dose of NHL time and proves he’s got what it takes to replace what Trouba brings to the top 4 D. Yes, lindgren is physical, but he lacks size/reach. Miller has size/reach, lacks physicality. Trouba is the only one that’s has both atm, and he’s also clears the crease.
That’s why I’ve stated multiple times, Schneider will likely break in on 3rd pairing next season while Trouba is still here. It would be advantageous for NYR/Schneider to do so.
Schneider, is the only guy in our system with the size/nasty/skill to hopefully take over for Trouba at some point. Why wouldn’t you want him playing, practicing, and learning from him as much as possible before he’s traded?
There’s no chance imo, the rangers run a top 4D of
Lindgren-Fox
Miller-Lundkvist
For next season. That type 4 lacks a lot of size and physicality.
Having kakko and Laf on the wings who should be another year older and better would make picking kreider or Strome way more logical before moving Trouba.
I doubt Kreider, Trouba, or Strome if he resigns, finish the entirety of their contracts on the rangers. But I’d wager if the rangers have to move/lose 1 next season, it won’t be Trouba.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: leetch99
I don't see Strome as a good type of playoff player for us . Panarin would have decent numbers with almost anybody . We have to keep an eye on playoffs when adding !!!! This upcoming playoff likely will be just an audition for us .....so these decisions on Strome cannot come back to haunt us cap wise over the next 3 seasons when we will be even stronger contenders...BUILD BUILD BUILD for beyond this season.....play the long game which could come around as soon as next season with some luck. Strome....trade him if the deal is right...or self rent him .

this is what I think Drury is banking on ( if/ when) he plans on resigning strome.
Strome has absolutely played well for us since we got him. But it’s also true since giving him his last deal, they were considering on not doing and just letting him walk btw, he has been shopped around as trade bait.
Drury knows the offers teams were willing to pay to get strome when he’s played well for us. They weren’t very good. No 1sts, top prospects, anything like that. That’s a big reason why he was still a ranger at the start of the year.
Despite playing well for us, I don’t think that there are many teams that would give strome the big new extension he’s looking for.
Most don’t believe he would score anywhere near the points he has without panarin. He most likely wouldn’t be a lock on other teams 1PP, and I’d wager they have serious doubts about him performing at a high level playing well in the playoffs.
We’ve all noticed what happens when the game gets tighter and more physical, the strome/panarin duo have a hard time, whoever there 3rd winger has been. When they have their time and space taken away a bit, it usually hasn’t gone well for their East/West style.
I really have no clue how many teams there are out there willing to invest in a long term contract and a bigger cap hit for strome while being a playoff team and giving him a similar role/opportunity.
The main problem is strome is more valuable to the rangers then Anyone else because of the way he plays with panarin and the amount of 5v5/PP time he gets here as opposed to other teams that would add him.
I’m sure Stromes agent will try to leverage that in negotiating his new deal. If I’m Drury, I don’t let that issue push me into a corner and force me to just give a big deal to strome and lose 1 of Kreider/trouba for nothing.
Drury will probably tender an offer, hopefully at the end of year, offseason. But the offer has to be advantageous to the rangers and it can’t be high dollar / multiple years/ and have clauses.
It’s basically going to be a giant game for chicken between Drury and Stromes agent. Whose going to blink first?
It’s going to conf down to strome/kreider basically. 1 stays and 1 is likely going. In Stromes case, he’s a FA so we get nothing back.
If it’s kreider and we ask him to waive early, we’re likely to receive little to nothing back as well.
Trouba will more then likely be here for at least another season after this one, maybe 2 before Schneider looks like he can step up and play top 4 minute and a similar role.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: leetch99
Kakko has the same information as the team and isn't going to lock himself into a bad deal long term.
I get that. but it would be an overpayment in the near future, something he hasn't earned yet. Somehwere around 5M could be enticing for him long term.
 
You get paid by the word?

No law that says you or anyone else needs to read it. Take @duhmetreE for example. His most recent post in this thread AGAIN proposes spending significantly more money than we could possibly have for next season on Kakko's extension. Apparently, ignorance is bliss.


I'm not paying for that

Weren't you the same guy posting Victorian novel-length pieces all about how Kravtsov is a victim of Chris Drury, supervillain extraordinaire?
 
No law that says you or anyone else needs to read it. Take @duhmetreE for example. His most recent post in this thread AGAIN proposes spending significantly more money than we could possibly have for next season on Kakko's extension. Apparently, ignorance is bliss.
How much am I spending?

Where's your dissertations on cap status so I can be enlightened.... you pompous donkey, the self proclaimed authority on cap expenditure and player movement.

iu
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: rangersfansince08
How much am I spending?

Where's your dissertations on cap status so I can be enlightened.... you pompous donkey, the self proclaimed authority on cap expenditure and player movement.

iu

Over and over again you post about importing players for next year. Two posts up, you want to offer Kakko a $5m+ contract. This whole thing started because a few of us started asking where the cap space for all of this is going to come from and you pitched a fit that it didn't matter or offered fairy tale scenarios about how we can simply move one or two low salary guys and then bring in several expensive guys. It's not a video game. You can't just turn the salary cap off. On paper, I'd love to do a bunch of the things you are suggesting. In terms of the quality of the roster, I think your moves would be great. I just don't see any way to do so and be even close to the cap. You can call me a pompous ass all you want. I speak with confidence because I did the homework and looked at the numbers. It's Capfriendly and basic addition and subtraction. Not exactly difficult to do (though I did learn a lot about performance bonuses in the process and how many of our younger kids have them).

I explained in detail why I see no cap space available for the next two years and no real way to open space up in that span. I could well be missing something, but nobody has suggested some alternative that I might have missed.

I'd love to lock up Kakko long term for an AAV of $5m. On a player "value" level, that would be phenomenal (esp after that insane Hughes contract). Can you explain to me how the team would be able to afford that A- for next season's tight cap, and B- in a way that doesn't leave us wide open to a Montreal offer sheet on Laf in 2023?

Edit--I was writing this when you posted your cap image. I responded to that post.
 
Last edited:
$4M for 13th forward and backup goalie

L9ug3gj.png

This lists the bonuses, but does it factor them into the cap number? I don't think it does (did a quick tally, not with the calculator, so I could be wrong on that). We can't roll over almost 5 million dollars into 2023. I'm also skeptical that Blais will sign for that small a raise.
 
What has Sammy Blais done to deserve a huge raise past what he’s making now?

Dude hasn’t played a full season in the league yet and he’s 26

Didn't say a huge raise. But as a guy with only one RFA year left, who will have arbitration rights, who the team specifically targeted in the Buch trade (taking a lesser package in order to get him), he does have enough leverage to get more than a 100k raise. I like the guy as a player, but he's one that I might walk away from depending on what he might get in arbitration--I just don't see Drury being as willing to walk away from a player he seemed to covet like that.
 
They honestly can’t move Trouba until Schneider gets a solid dose of NHL time and proves he’s got what it takes to replace what Trouba brings to the top 4 D. Yes, lindgren is physical, but he lacks size/reach. Miller has size/reach, lacks physicality. Trouba is the only one that’s has both atm, and he’s also clears the crease.
That’s why I’ve stated multiple times, Schneider will likely break in on 3rd pairing next season while Trouba is still here. It would be advantageous for NYR/Schneider to do so.
Schneider, is the only guy in our system with the size/nasty/skill to hopefully take over for Trouba at some point. Why wouldn’t you want him playing, practicing, and learning from him as much as possible before he’s traded?
There’s no chance imo, the rangers run a top 4D of
Lindgren-Fox
Miller-Lundkvist
For next season. That type 4 lacks a lot of size and physicality.
Having kakko and Laf on the wings who should be another year older and better would make picking kreider or Strome way more logical before moving Trouba.
I doubt Kreider, Trouba, or Strome if he resigns, finish the entirety of their contracts on the rangers. But I’d wager if the rangers have to move/lose 1 next season, it won’t be Trouba.
Forget about moving Trouba. Just forget it.
 
Forget about moving Trouba. Just forget it.

Trouba is any GM's dream the way he is playing now. No way he is getting moved. The cap (& LW glut) may squeeze out Kreider if Drury insists on signing Stromer.
 
This lists the bonuses, but does it factor them into the cap number? I don't think it does (did a quick tally, not with the calculator, so I could be wrong on that). We can't roll over almost 5 million dollars into 2023. I'm also skeptical that Blais will sign for that small a raise.

We don't need to account for the bonuses unless they exceed the bonus cushion, in which case we have to account for the excess. The bonus cushion is 7.5% of the salary cap, which will be 6.1875 mil next year. If the total potential bonuses exceeded the bonus cushion by 2 mil, for example, then we'd need to be at least 2 mil under the cap to account for that. But there's no chance we'll exceed the bonus cushion.

For the bonuses to roll over into the following year, they first have to be earned, and they have to exceed our remaining cap space at the end of the year. Whatever the excess is gets rolled over. There's probably zero chance that the full amount of the bonuses are earned, but without knowing the specific bonuses each player got, it's hard to predict. As as an example though, if 1 mil of the bonuses are earned and we have 700k in cap space left at the end of the year, 300k would get rolled over.

Blais' QO is 1.6 mil. I agree that he will get more than that. I also can't see any reason why Seattle is trading us Gourde and retaining 50% for 3 years. They are trying to win too. And I'll believe Kravtsov is still a Ranger next season when I see it. Maybe the relationship can be repaired and maybe Kravtsov will learn to be a professional, but I'm not holding my breath.
 
This lists the bonuses, but does it factor them into the cap number? I don't think it does (did a quick tally, not with the calculator, so I could be wrong on that). We can't roll over almost 5 million dollars into 2023. I'm also skeptical that Blais will sign for that small a raise.

You've been beating your chest this whole time and it turns out you don't fully understand it. How can you be so condescending and wrong?
 
  • Like
Reactions: DanielBrassard
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad