Your bias against Zucc is just as bad and cringey as Webster’s bias for him.Would be a waste of 7.5 mill and a C
Would Zucc take a discount if they made him the captain? Say something like...3 years at 2.5M per?
Your bias against Zucc is just as bad and cringey as Webster’s bias for him.
Just so you know.
It doesn’t matter what the return is for Zucc. Or Hayes.Zucc will probably ask 5M or more. And the captaincy, the only thing I mentioned is if they see him in that role the term should be long enough for it to have an effect, and then it will make more sense to include a NMC.
But I'm still ready for a trade. The Rangers will probably pull the trigger if a great offer comes in, and they have to do it anyway if they are too far apart when it comes to an extension.
nahIt doesn’t matter what the return is for Zucc. Or Hayes.
You trade both guys and gain whatever assets that can help the rebuild. Even if it’s a measly ****ing 7th in the 2021 draft.
If the Rangers see either guy as a core player going forward, they can net whatever those players value is and then re-sign them in 4 1/2 months.
nah
You do that once and you'll never get value in a trade ever again. We have options, it'd be dumb and counterproductive to the rebuild to impose limits on ourselves.
If you're getting gamed out by buyers, you sign to a friendly, shorter contract with partial trade protections, and try again at the draft, or next year. You don't let other GMs get your assets without paying at least fair value. Or else you won't be rebuilding anything at all. Just selling off.C’mon dude..
Both players are clearly worth a heck of a lot more.
My point is Gorton shouldn’t nickel and dime his way trying to maxime their return. Even if for some reason he wants to bring either one of these guys back, you move them now and just re-sign then in a few months.
Hell, he’s being doing both players a favor by allowing them an opportunity of winning a Cup. It’s mutually beneficial for both sides.
For sure. Give us something hahaDear God, we need an actual trade...
As talks continue, you should know that contract length is every bit as important to both the Rangers and impending free agents Kevin Hayes and Mats Zuccarello as the money and cap hit. Both players are seeking longer-term deals they almost certainly would command if they get to the open market. Management, for obvious reasons, would like shorter-term deals. It is still a much better bet the Rangers will trade both players rather than re-sign them. And if these negotiations do not come to fruition and either/both are dealt, the likelihood of a July 1 reunion would seem remote, indeed. No one is taking less on July 1 than he is on, say, Feb. 25
My feeling is McQuaid is the first to go. His value is pretty much set.For sure. Give us something haha
Because you read eklund or @nhlrumors
I'd listen to Brooks instead.
I’m really impressed with the development of Mika and Vlad. Aside from the really young guys who’ve been developing. Vlad and Mika are younger vets who have really raised their games by, like, a hundred percent.
In fact, nearly everyone on the team has gotten better. But those guys are particularly impressive as players don’t often get so much better at age 25-26.
Hey man, you've always been good at compiling information and addressing these articles and sources from all over the place really well. But lately you've kinda devolved into mostly just being pissed off, trying to prove you were right where others were wrong (usually subjectively), and simply being uninformative. Maybe take a step back from this site - I'll miss your info and whatnot but you really don't seem to get anything good out of posting here anymore.
Webbys been with out his mind for a while now.
Between that and someone questioning RB on the last page its like some of ya'll dont even read this board.