- Sep 17, 2007
- 24,968
- 22,938
Does anyone regret the Gaborik signing? Without him we're almost challenging Edmonton and Toronto (Boston) for 1OA in 2009-10. We probably don't get all the way there due to Hank, but wind up in the 3-5 range in the end. We pick Ryan Johansen or Erik Gudbranson.
Stone/Panarin being available as UFA is very akin to Gaborik/Hossa being available in 2009. Nobody regretted those signings for a second. Gaborik signed a 5-year deal at the equivalent of $10.6M AAV. Hossa signed a now illegal contract, but the first seven seasons were at the equivalent of $11.1M AAV.
Karlsson being available is not really like Chara being available because he is better than Chara was. Do you think Boston regretted that signing despite being in the middle of a rebuild at the time? Chara was given the equivalent of a $13.6M AAV contract at the time.
This isn't Drury or Redden. These guys aren't "very good" players on the wrong side of 30, these are elite players in the 27-29 range. This type of player had not been available as a UFA for a very long time before Tavares last summer, now we potentially have three in the same summer. If any of these guys are willing to sign with the Rangers at a reasonable rate we have to pull the trigger, esp if they are willing to leave some money on the table to come here. Trading for Ryan Callahan's contract to get a few minor assets and taking us out of that running is not a good idea.
We weren't in the middle of a rebuild when we signed Gaborik. Apples and Oranges. The Gaborik signing ending up working out well, but only because we traded him for Brassard, then traded Brassard for Zib. Are either Stone or Panarin signing 5 year deals? I doubt it.