bl02
Registered User
- Jan 13, 2014
- 33,988
- 24,927
yep. Would not be surprised if he did.And get it.
yep. Would not be surprised if he did.And get it.
They never said the player with term was valuable so it could be Namestnikov for all we know.It is Jimmy Murphy so take that with a grain of salt
Kreider definitely has to be the unnamed player right? No one else with term is really valuable on our team, no chance it’s Zibby either
Hopefully it’s Skjei
You’re right, but I also don’t want to move Kreider unless it’s bringing back a high-quality asset in the ilk of Debrusk. You can’t screw up that type of trade when we’re lacking top-6 players, and we don’t have any immediate replacements.
Does only having 1 year left make this more challenging? Of course, but it’s up for Gorton to make the right move here.
Almost as terrible as trading McAvoy for Hayes and Shattenkirk from the Bs perspective.Hayes and Shattenkirk for McAvoy
Trading Kreider would be terrible. At that point trade everyone. Let's be an AHL team for 3-4 years
bruhHe’s not returning Debrusk. No chance. Aim lower. I like the idea of Carlo if they can find a taker elsewhere for him. You could get a high end piece for Carlo.
Carlo + Donato + Frederic + BOS 2nd ‘19 for Kreider + McQuaid
Carlo for Nylander
He’s not returning Debrusk. No chance. Aim lower. I like the idea of Carlo if they can find a taker elsewhere for him. You could get a high end piece for Carlo.
Carlo + Donato + Frederic + BOS 2nd ‘19 for Kreider + McQuaid
Carlo for Nylander
No chance of Kreider bringing back DeBrusk, but then you trade Carlo for Nylander?
2nd pairing LHDs are not a rare commodity in this league.
He really just needs to simplify everything and stop trying to be a full on offensive defensemanThey kind of are when they’re 24 with term.
I know you’re not a fan but of him, for some good reasons, but I also feel you can be more patient with his development.
He has the tools, attitude, and the physical build. His decision making is my main concern and I think that can be remedied with coaching and experience.
He really just needs to simplify everything and stop trying to be a full on offensive defenseman
Hayes and Shattenkirk for McAvoy
Trading Kreider would be terrible. At that point trade everyone. Let's be an AHL team for 3-4 years
Scouting Report
- Sturdy two-way defenseman who immediately became a key cog on Boston University’s blueline. A native of Long Island who was reared in the Gulls’ program before a run with last year’s NTDP under-18 squad, McAvoy is built for the modern game – thick, explosive and assertive. He’s a strong skater with excellent balance and superior mobility both up and across the ice. McAvoy loves to join the rush and can read a play as good as any of his draft-eligible peers – something we saw last year as a defenseman on Team USA.
He’s a confident puck carrier who attacks openings with speed, but can also slow it down and patiently weigh his options. Always moving his feet, McAvoy is capable of slipping through gaps without the puck, or stickhandling around traffic while keeping the puck close to his body. He has a heavy shot that can be delivered with accuracy, and his passes are tape to tape, An undervalued part of his game is physicality, which gets him in hot water as he’s still learning the difference between a timely, legal bone-crushing hit and gross negligence of the rule book.
This board latches on to proposals and sets ridiculous expectations for trade returns with every player. Kinda funny.
It's the soap opera aspect I guess.
Honestly though on Brendan Lemiuex here's a real question. If his last name was anything else, would anyone even care about him?
A lot of Rangers fans have missed the Dubi/Avery/Dorsett/Carcillo kinds of players, that's one where the hype for him would be even higher outside of this placeIt's the soap opera aspect I guess.
Honestly though on Brendan Lemiuex here's a real question. If his last name was anything else, would anyone even care about him?