Speculation: Roster Building Thread - Part XXII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
You're not going to get Zibanejad for much less than Eichel's AAV. And you're getting Eichel for the rest of his 20's, while Zbad's majority years would be in his 30's.

There is an alternative, but it doesnt involve the fantasyland stuff of Zibanejad taking anything less than 7 years. It involves acquiring Eichel and selling Zbad at the deadline to replenish the assets. If Eichel's neck condition is sorted out, it may be the best alternative.

Lol. No, none of that please. Sounds like you have relegated us to two options. Which sounds like "fantasyland" to me. You can offer Zibs 2-4 years. If he doesn't like it he can go play elsewhere.
 
You're in fantasyland if you think hes not going to pursue the most conceivable guaranteed years. If he was willing to entertain 5 years, he'd be signed already. Full stop.

Ok. Then maybe let him walk/? Like I said. But you are still pretending you know what he wants. FULL STOP. So right now, this is ALL "fantasyland".
 
And if Couturier or Barkov go to Free Agency, I would prefer either of them to Zibs right now. Hertl, Bergeron also possibilities. This is just next offseason.
 
Lol. No, none of that please. Sounds like you have relegated us to two options. Which sounds like "fantasyland" to me. You can offer Zibs 2-4 years. If he doesn't like it he can go play elsewhere.

That definitely makes a lot of sense! Love the option where we wind up with #1C Chytil. Will be a real blast.

2-4 years. Lol. I just cant understand the cognitive dissonance that allows people to pursue this line of thinking. In fact, if the Rangers did offer something like that, it'd be a worse case scenario insult.
 
In 2016 the LA kings gave a 29 year old Anze Kopitar a 8x 10 million contract. The summer before, the Hawks re-signed 27 year old Jonathan Toews to a 8x10.5 million contract.

Neither of those deal has been a poor one for the team in question, because each club is more or less re-building now at the ass end of the contracts.
 
In 2016 the LA kings gave a 29 year old Anze Kopitar a 8x 10 million contract. The summer before, the Hawks re-signed 27 year old Jonathan Toews to a 8x10.5 million contract.

Neither of those deal has been a poor one for the team in question, because each club is more or less re-building now at the ass end of the contracts.

I would rather have Kopitar at 28 or Toews at 27 than Zibs at 29. While I like Zibs, I don't consider him the class of either of those players.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mas0764
That definitely makes a lot of sense! Love the option where we wind up with #1C Chytil. Will be a real blast.

2-4 years. Lol. I just cant understand the cognitive dissonance that allows people to pursue this line of thinking. In fact, if the Rangers did offer something like that, it'd be a worse case scenario insult.

If "narrow minded" was a competition, you'd be in contention for first place right now. Chytil is 21. IMO he's all ready good enough to be 2C. Neither you or I know where he will be in 3 years from now.
 
I would rather have Kopitar at 28 or Toews at 27 than Zibs at 29. While I like Zibs, I don't consider him the class of either of those players.

That I think is the crucial point.

2018-2020 ZIbanejad is on a level with those guys, in my opinion.

2021 and 2017 Zibanejad are very clearly not.

So it comes down to which Zibby we think we are gonna get, and for how many seasons.
 
That I think is the crucial point.

2018-2020 ZIbanejad is on a level with those guys, in my opinion.

2021 and 2017 Zibanejad are very clearly not.

So it comes down to which Zibby we think we are gonna get, and for how many seasons.

I think another crucial point is that, given the fact that we're just (hopefully) entering a window, the thing that makes the Kopitar and Toews deals more tolerable won't apply, if things go right. The Blackhawks and Kings were each 5 years or so into their windows when the deals were signed. It would make sense for those teams to be on the other end of the cycle later in those deals.

In the Rangers case, Zibanejad would be on his bad contract when the Rangers would hopefully still be competitive. It's a different calculcation.
 
Next years UFA C crop will still be pretty significant and/or the option to sign a trade a guy will be there + what ever other players end up shaking loose as trade options between now and the end of the 2021-22 season.

No need to get silly with Zibanejad just yet.
 
lol fair enough Couturier is off the list. That st ill leaves 4 or 5 other possibilities. And that's only in free agency. We have the assets to make trades. Assets in excess.

Barkov is supposedly signing an extension soon (next month). Hasn't happened yet, but there's little chance he'll be on the market.

I looked at the link you posted. I don't see a single 1C option that's not 35+, which doesn't solve a longer term 1C issue.

If the Rangers solve this outside of the organization, it's going to be via trade and not free agency.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Thirty One
In 2016 the LA kings gave a 29 year old Anze Kopitar a 8x 10 million contract. The summer before, the Hawks re-signed 27 year old Jonathan Toews to a 8x10.5 million contract.

Neither of those deal has been a poor one for the team in question, because each club is more or less re-building now at the ass end of the contracts.

If the NYR are rebuilding in ~5 years when Zibanejad's contract could be a nuclear warhead to their cap for another 3-4 years, something went really wrong. This IMO is the crux of the issue. Kopitar got paid at this level after the Kings already won 2 Cups...Toews after the Hawks won 3.

We are talking about giving a huge (if admittedly lesser) contract to Zibanejad who is 1. at a minimum more one-dimensional if not just not as good overall and 2. doesn't align with the NYR's hopeful trajectory and "rebuild core."

I concede that the options here may be limited. But the answer can't be making a (largely) unforced error of this magnitude when the end state / timeline of this group is still extremely TBD.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mas0764
I think another crucial point is that, given the fact that we're just (hopefully) entering a window, the thing that makes the Kopitar and Toews deals more tolerable won't apply, if things go right. The Blackhawks and Kings were each 5 years or so into their windows when the deals were signed. It would make sense for those teams to be on the other end of the cycle later in those deals.

In the Rangers case, Zibanejad would be on his bad contract when the Rangers would hopefully still be competitive. It's a different calculcation.

To piggyback on this, if Zibanejad signed an 8 year deal, both Kakko and Lafreniere would still be in their 20s when it expired. So Zibanejad "sucking" the last 2-3 years would actually overlap with Kakko 26-29 years old and Lafreniere being 25-28 years old.

It's cause for concern.
 
To piggyback on this, if Zibanejad signed an 8 year deal, both Kakko and Lafreniere would still be in their 20s when it expired. So Zibanejad "sucking" the last 2-3 years would actually overlap with Kakko 26-29 years old and Lafreniere being 25-28 years old.

It's cause for concern.

It is, but there aren't too many teams out there, good or bad, who don't have some players on the roster who are still useful, but overpaid.

Problem is we already have two of those in Trouba and Kreider, but they can both be gone in 3 seasons.
 
That I think is the crucial point.

2018-2020 ZIbanejad is on a level with those guys, in my opinion.

2021 and 2017 Zibanejad are very clearly not.

So it comes down to which Zibby we think we are gonna get, and for how many seasons.

Yea. And that's a big reason why I am not sold we should give him a long term contract like that. There is something to be said, also, for guys that HAVE won you a Stanley Cup. There's a bit more, loyalty and admiration for past deeds.

I don't know if we can COUNT on Zibby being that player for the majority of that long term extension. And frankly, Kopitar and Toews both, even as their play declines, I think offer so much more in intangibles, leadership qualities and they ALWAYS did. Using them as the example is maybe not quite as fair. These were always two guys who brought so much more to the table, that even if they are no longer performing, still add so much to a roster and especially in helping young guys along or things like team chemistry etc..
 
It is, but there aren't too many teams out there, good or bad, who don't have some players on the roster who are still useful, but overpaid.

Problem is we already have two of those in Trouba and Kreider, but they can both be gone in 3 seasons.

I don't think Trouba will quite hit that point. We're talking about a guy who is still 27 and whose deal expires when he's 33.

I think people are barking up the wrong tree on the Trouba argument.

In the scheme of contracts we have to worry about, Trouba's really isn't on the radar.
 
I don't think Trouba will quite hit that point. We're talking about a guy who is still 27 and whose deal expires when he's 33.

I think people are barking up the wrong tree on the Trouba argument.

In the scheme of contracts we have to worry about, Trouba's really isn't on the radar.

Thing is, if Nils Lundkvist or Schneider take off like a rocket, they're gonna get paid eventually. Probably in that same 3 years time, as it turns out.

NYR can't spend 25 million dollars just on the right defense. The stars align pretty well with a culling that offseason.
 
  • Like
Reactions: HatTrick Swayze
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad