Machinehead
HFNYR MVP
So we trade Hank to Toronto?Georgiev and Andersen could/should end up a time share. Like Georgiev and Henrik right now. Me thinks.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/27998/27998eed92ccd134ee0471460daedba4386654b2" alt="sarcasm :sarcasm: :sarcasm:"
So we trade Hank to Toronto?Georgiev and Andersen could/should end up a time share. Like Georgiev and Henrik right now. Me thinks.
I don’t think Gorts cares where Kreider goes as a rental. Next season Kreider goes wherever he wants. I do agree The Rangers probably would like to avoid playing against Kreider in-division for the next 6 or 7 seasons. But The Rangers probably don’t have much of a say in that.Doubtful.Gorton wont move him in division and i doubt Pitt would want to help us out in any way.
I would hold Kravtsov until his value goes back up. I’m sure the Rangers could substitute in someone else. Maybe even Buchnevich and get a bit more back. Then re-sign CKPosted the below on the main boards in one of the Leafs threads, some Leafs fans think it was fair. Goes with my above post about buying out Staal and Smith.
Skjei ($5.25MM x 4 years), Kravstov ($950k ELC x 2 years), Georgiev ($800K RFA) for Nylander ($7MM x 4 years) and Kapanen ($3.2MM x 2 years)
I took out the offered 2nd round pick coming from the Leafs in the original proposal.
Cap to Leafs: $6.25MM plus Georgiev new contract (probably $3-4MM) so $9.25-$10.25MM.
Cap to Rangers: $10.2MM. Both Staal and Smith should get bought out this offseason
He absolutely should care-rental or not,he needs to get the best return possible if hes serious about this rebuild,or its possibly his ass on the line.I don’t think Gorts cares where Kreider goes as a rental.
I don’t think Gorts cares where Kreider goes as a rental. Next season Kreider goes wherever he wants. I do agree The Rangers probably would like to avoid playing against Kreider in-division for the next 6 or 7 seasons. But The Rangers probably don’t have much of a say in that.
I agree. Trouba has been great. And perfect for this team. Just what we needed.Halfway through year 1 of the contract, has been arguably our best defenseman in all aspects of the game stabilizing the right side, but hey “newsflash” Trouba wasn’t worth signing...
Cant make this stuff up....
Another bullsh#t statement. If Kreider was as lazy as you say then surely no team would be willing to offer a good package? Gotta be a tiny bit fair at leastConsidering he'd probably show up for only 2-3 of those games, I'd be fine with it.
Evan Rodrigues has requested a trade from Buffalo. Played 2 years under DQ at BU.
I would hold Kravtsov until his value goes back up. I’m sure the Rangers could substitute in someone else. Maybe even Buchnevich and get a bit more back. Then re-sign CK![]()
Evan Rodrigues has requested a trade from Buffalo. Played 2 years under DQ at BU.
Another bullsh#t statement. If Kreider was as lazy as you say then surely no team would be willing to offer a good package? Gotta be a tiny bit fair at least
The Rangers have 9-10 players I can see playing important roles on a Stanley Cup contender. They need to add at least 4-5 more.
Some of this will come from emerging youth. Some hopefully will c9me in a trade or two. And there will be 1-2 strategic free agent signings.
The salary cap will be tight next year but beyond that things loosen up allowing room to move.
My primary concern right now is seeing the Rangers keeping those 9-10 players in house and if they absolutely have to move one of them, getting equivalent hockey talent back.
Kreider and Lindgren for starters. I didn’t consider Kravtsov because I think of him as emerging youth. Strome good possibility too.Who would you say those players are?
Zbad
Panarin
Kakko
Fox
ADA
Trouba
Chytil
One of Shesh or Georgiev
Who else would you list? Strome? Lindgren? Kravstov?
Kreider and Lindgren for starters. I didn’t consider Kravtsov because I think of him as emerging youth. Strome good possibility too.
That’s my point. If Pittsburgh or the Devils or the Isles make the best offer, he’ll take it. Doesn’t matter if it’s a division rival.He absolutely should care-rental or not,he needs to get the best return possible if hes serious about this rebuild,or its possibly his ass on the line.
Considering he'd probably show up for only 2-3 of those games, I'd be fine with it.
Dont think hes very good. 3pts so far this season and 20 something last year. Dreger mentioned his name has been out there a for a while, guess not much interest.
He’s a higher energy forward from what I remember. We say this all the time, but he’d be an upgrade to the 4th line
The Rangers have 9-10 players I can see playing important roles on a Stanley Cup contender. They need to add at least 4-5 more.
Some of this will come from emerging youth. Some hopefully will come in a trade or two from some of our excess in certain positions. And there will be 1-2 strategic free agent signings.
The salary cap will be tight next year but beyond that things loosen up allowing room to move.
My primary concern right now is seeing the Rangers keeping those 9-10 players in house and if they absolutely have to move one of them, getting equivalent hockey talent back.
Agreed. If panarin wasn’t here, the reality of where the rebuild is would be a little clearer. Not sure I could put an accurate number on how many victories he has accounted for. Five to ten less wins would change our perspective a bit.It's that additional 4-5 that's really going to be interesting to watch. I don't think we have all of them in-house, and my concerns about having the savings account to acquire them aside for a moment, I completely agree that trades are coming at some point.
It's that next phase, that's going to go a long way toward determining whether this a team that challenges for a spot in the upper echelon in a few years, or kind of hangs in the low 20s and hopes for a greater number of breaks to go its way.