Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XVIV

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Kuokkonen is definitely someone who the Rangers would ask about, based on what I've heard.
see that’s what I want. I’ve never heard of this guy before. But now I can dial in and do some research, keep an eye out.

Kuokkonen is an awesome name too? Is he a Finn, say what you want but that a built in + nowerdays
 
  • Like
Reactions: egelband
Yes it would be lateral in many senses. But the difference is playing styles. And the bruins have had a long time to watch kreiders career and debrusks 3 seasons or whatever with the club and they may feel they would be even tougher to handle with Kreider as opposed to debrusk with that money and in that top 6 spot. That’s what I’m coming from at least

Contending teams don't typically make lateral moves whose intent is just to change the look of the team.

They could get Kreider for less, unsigned, and fundamentally improve their team.
 
Contending teams don't typically make lateral moves whose intent is just to change the look of the team.

They could get Kreider for less, unsigned, and fundamentally improve their team.
True enough. No doubt. It was just an idea haha
 
True enough. No doubt. It was just an idea haha

The way something like that would play out... where the Bruins preferred Kreider over DeBrusk on their team for the long-term and had to make the choice between the two. They'd make that decision after acquiring Kreider as a rental. Then they'd sign Kreider to his deal, and trade DeBrusk to recoup the assets they gave up for Kreider (and probably more). There's no need to make that either/or choice during this season.
 
I guess if we're looking for a "Brassard for Zibanejad" type deal (aka a total rip off) then Kreider for DeBrusk would fit the bill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kendo
The way something like that would play out... where the Bruins preferred Kreider over DeBrusk on their team for the long-term and had to make the choice between the two. They'd make that decision after acquiring Kreider as a rental. Then they'd sign Kreider to his deal, and trade DeBrusk to recoup the assets they gave up for Kreider (and probably more). There's no need to make that either/or choice during this season.
Dang, I don’t have that textbook. Written in blood or ink?

But your probably right. Thanks for the lesson
 
Yeah, and I've always liked him. I just can't help but think he's not a long term core piece for this team which is what we should be collecting more of or at least attempting to.

I think he and Kreider + our 2020 2nd might be able to score one crazy package. I dunno. It's a weird season, who knows who is available really.

Carolina has our 2020 2nd from the Fox trade.

I don't think we'll see a trade like that at the TDL. If Skjei is traded at all, it would be an offseason move, though I don't think they are in any rush to trade him. We have a lot of prospects on the left side, but they need to prove they are NHL players first.
 
Kamanev is a guy from Colorado that interests me. Definitely a question mark. Injuries have kept him out of play the past couple of seasons but he does have talent.

maybe as a throw in but if he is the main piece in any Kreider trade, Rangers should look elsewhere
 
Kreider for DeBrusk, aside from being unrealistic, isn't the kind of move a team like Boston makes. They want to add to their depth scoring, not marginally upgrade a single part of it.

A 1st and a guy like Frederic is pretty fair value based on what we've seen over the last couple years. If Gorton thinks there's a real risk of Boston re-signing Kreider, then perhaps there will be some sort of conditional 2021 pick added.
 


And to showcase him

I would hope that would be the reasoning because LOL the logic of "he played well vs them last year" as to why he's starting is so stupid.

Not like he's hot either he's had two of his weaker games this year in each of his last two outings with 3 goals against on 18 shots vs SJ and 3 goals against on 22 shots vs NSH.

Just another DQ galaxy brain situation. Let's see how many different line combinations he trots out there tomorrow.
 
CHYTIL WITH KAKKO?!?!?!?!

:scared::scared::scared::scared:

Ya know, I should be as excited as you. But I don't like it right now. We FINALLY had a game where we had multiple lines clicking because each line had a duo with chemistry. Panarin-Strome, Z-bad-CK, Chytil-Buch. And now we're breaking that up. Chytil and Buch have great chemistry. I'd prefer to keep them together. I get that Kakko is struggling to find a center he has chemistry with. And i'm not ruling out that it could be Chytil. But I would have preferred to keep the duos that are clicking together for a while. The speed the team played with last game was so much better and dangerous even if we weren't converting. We'll see. But its annoying.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kendo
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad