Speculation: Roster Building Thread: Part XVIII

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
So do NYR go to arbitration with ADA for a bridge deal to keep the cost down until the Fox decision?

That’s exactly what I think they do. 2-3 years depending on how much cap they see being available. It pushes the decision down the road while maintaining an asset.
 
So do NYR go to arbitration with ADA for a bridge deal to keep the cost down until the Fox decision?

I doubt it. He has 3 years left as an RFA, so I think the Rangers go either 2 or 4 years. They might put both on the table and let ADA choose.

If they do go to arbitration, it will be because ADA elected it, not the team.
 
If Fox passes ADA on the depth chart and one of those prospects shows that they can play in the NHL, then it would make more sense to trade ADA in that scenario. We will save cap space and we will get more in return.

Either way, the decision is likely a year or two away.
I have to disagree on one point, my friend. Fox has long since passed ADA on the depth chart. He’s been in the NHL for 3 months vs. 3 1/2 years and he is almost as adroit offensively and far, far better defensively. Fox is surprisingly effective with his stick and positioning skills.

I’m very pleased with ADA’s development but I am even more thrilled with Fox’s body of work.

If you think about it, having too many quality RHDs is never really an issue.
 
I have to disagree on one point, my friend. Fox has long since passed ADA on the depth chart. He’s been in the NHL for 3 months vs. 3 1/2 years and he is almost as adroit offensively and far, far better defensively. Fox is surprisingly effective with his stick and positioning skills.

I’m very pleased with ADA’s development but I am even more thrilled with Fox’s body of work.

If you think about it, having too many quality RHDs is never really an issue.

Fox’s IQ is next level kind of ****.

He processes plays like a veteran. A smart veteran. It’s just, unnatural for a kid with his inexperience to make some of the plays he’s making at such an early stage in his career.

Having said that, he’ll never be as dynamic offensively as ADA, if that makes any sense.

The biggest issue (if you want to even call it an issue) is our 3 best dmen are right handed. I think Fox has the smarts and talent where he might be able to make that adjustment to LD.

I like the experiment of Fox at LD. If he can make that transition, then keeping him and ADA long term makes sense.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ola and NYRangers16
The disrespect for ADA is downright ridiculous.

Reminscent of the board’s feelings on JT Miller which is looking just great right now.
People just can’t enjoy the process. The highs and lows are a part of it. Don’t wanna make the playoffs only to get slaughtered. If the sell off turns out right, Rangers will have the money to do something nice next season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Musto
I find it odd that the Rangers would worry about paying for the current three on RD even if one is on the 3rd pair.

In the past they've paid a ton in cap space for defenders who should have been on the 3rd pair. They still are paying Staal who is at most a 3rd pair, Smith who is now a 4th liner and Shattenkirk who they bought out. Would it be so bad to finally have a defender playing below his normal pairing instead of above it?

If it turns out they have 3 good RD and all of them need to take up cap space, they'd could keep them all and just figure out how to be more efficient elsewhere. That efficiency is not likely to come from them re-signing Kreider, Fast, or holding onto Lundqvist for his final year.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pld459666
The disrespect for ADA is downright ridiculous.

Reminscent of the board’s feelings on JT Miller which is looking just great right now.
I am not even sure why it always has to be Fox vs. ADA.
They are both really impressive young talents. Fox has a subtleness to his game and his awareness is off the charts. ADA has electricity in his veins and can get you out of your seat- and still has great awareness. Wouldn't it be great if we kept both like we should have with Leetch/Zubov? We need to learn from history.
 
So do NYR go to arbitration with ADA for a bridge deal to keep the cost down until the Fox decision?
I think you have to go that route. Until ADA proves he can defend better you have to strike a balance and probably lean toward Fox as a long term priority.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NYRangers16
Fox is already ahead of him in the roster in his rookie year. I have no doubt he stays there for the next number of years. Investing 5 or 6 mill longterm for a guy who is on the 3rd pair isnt the way to run a team in the cap system.
We should probably keep this in the DeAngelo thread. How is Fox ahead of him? Look at their ice time's. Aside from whomever plays on the pair with Trouba, the Rangers have no true 2nd or third pair.

One could argue that NOT investing $5-6m in a 24 year old that is producing like a 55-60 point defenseman is no way to run a franchise.
I love the player but unless he can move to the left side he is a player who can be replaced by someone who maybe doesnt put up as many points but might prevent more goals for league minimum.
For a 60 point defenseman, you live with the defensive warts and obtain a suitable defensive partner for him.
 
Currently, DeAngelo is the most overrated player by our fan base. He has high level offensive skill but he's stupid defensively. Lundkvist's scouting reports all stated that he has a extremely high hockey IQ. Rarely makes mistakes. Now he's added a lot of offense to his game. TDA is outta here. I don't know if they will sign him to a 2 year bridge deal, give Lundkvist one year in the AHL then move him or just package TDA this year for a tough, young forward with talent. This forward group is still soft.
#AndTheIdiocyJustContinues
 
We should probably keep this in the DeAngelo thread. How is Fox ahead of him? Look at their ice time's. Aside from whomever plays on the pair with Trouba, the Rangers have no true 2nd or third pair.

One could argue that NOT investing $5-6m in a 24 year old that is producing like a 55-60 point defenseman is no way to run a franchise.

For a 60 point defenseman, you live with the defensive warts and obtain a suitable defensive partner for him.

Yeah, so, Ill wait until DeAngelo actually becomes a 60 point defenseman before even beginning to worry about this stuff.
 
Yeah, so, Ill wait until DeAngelo actually becomes a 60 point defenseman before even beginning to worry about this stuff.
I can't stand when people attribute a point total to a player who has yet to hit it. Not only is it a surefire jinx, it just leads to disappointment when that player doesn't reach those lofty expectations. People were calling Chris Kreider a 30 goal scorer at one point.

Babcock is a giant arse, but he has a very good quote: "Until you've won the cup, you have not won the cup." The same applies here, until he is a 60 point d-man, he isn't one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pld459666
We should probably keep this in the DeAngelo thread. How is Fox ahead of him? Look at their ice time's. Aside from whomever plays on the pair with Trouba, the Rangers have no true 2nd or third pair.

One could argue that NOT investing $5-6m in a 24 year old that is producing like a 55-60 point defenseman is no way to run a franchise.

For a 60 point defenseman, you live with the defensive warts and obtain a suitable defensive partner for him.

Their ice time is almost identical. I don't see anyone suggesting that ADA should be traded now. By all means, re-sign him. But it's likely that a decision will be coming in the future as young guys start to push for spots.

If and when ADA gets traded, it won't be for futures. It will be for a player who helps us in an area of weakness. If you could trade ADA for a left-handed Trouba, would you do it? What about for a left-handed ADA or a left-handed Fox?
 
I can't stand when people attribute a point total to a player who has yet to hit it. Not only is it a surefire jinx, it just leads to disappointment when that player doesn't reach those lofty expectations. People were calling Chris Kreider a 30 goal scorer at one point.

Babcock is a giant arse, but he has a very good quote: "Until you've won the cup, you have not won the cup." The same applies here, until he is a 60 point d-man, he isn't one.

In fairness though, Kreider scored 28 (twice) in 75 and 79 games. For all intents and purposes, his peak value and production was that of a 30 goal scorer.

As for ADA, we do have to be incredibly careful with projecting, for all the reasons you've stated. They're quite accurate. But there is some comfort in the sense that he's scored something like 55 points in his last 82 games or something along those lines.
 
If they move deangelo, itll be for a haul. If they move georgieve, itll be for a package deal thatll be a haul. If they move kreider itll be a 2nd and a b prospect. If the rangers move for picks, i want them to use those picks to target nhl ready players. We have a ton of prospects, make a no touch list and use some for better players. Ada will prob be moved if contractually theres a disagreement, most likely next season than this one tho. Fox is a future 1, im calling it. Trouba is a workhorse 1rd, just not super duper elite, more like he will play that role nicely, but theres a rlly high level that he wont reach, and thats fine, finding a trouba is hard enough. Personally, i wanna move skjei, kreider, and possibly strome. In return, we need a 1Ld, i think next season is kandre time, skjei has good value on a good contract, hes just not a 1Ld. Look at our weaknesses and thats what gorton will target, he will go for the wings (needs a lw to replace kreider) and a 2 or a 1rw (kakko will fill one, buch is a very good 3rd liner, despite his success, he is just not a super duper top six player, i like him a lot tho when he is on his game. Deboer is fired, sharks might try to save the season. If georgie is dropped off, would make sense, but i think they keep him as a 1a/1b with shesterkin. If they dont, hes a package for a haul, no low return
 
I can't stand when people attribute a point total to a player who has yet to hit it. Not only is it a surefire jinx, it just leads to disappointment when that player doesn't reach those lofty expectations. People were calling Chris Kreider a 30 goal scorer at one point.

Babcock is a giant arse, but he has a very good quote: "Until you've won the cup, you have not won the cup." The same applies here, until he is a 60 point d-man, he isn't one.

This whole conversation is jumping the gun. Im not sure why fans can't enjoy the development of both Fox and DeAngelo without worrying about their next contracts and long-term ramifications. When you attribute benchmarks to a player that he's yet to ever reach, it muddies the issue even further.

The ironic thing is I bet this kind of stuff is the furthest thing from Gorton's mind - he'll worry about it in the offseason, when the results are actually in.
 
I am not even sure why it always has to be Fox vs. ADA.
They are both really impressive young talents. Fox has a subtleness to his game and his awareness is off the charts. ADA has electricity in his veins and can get you out of your seat- and still has great awareness. Wouldn't it be great if we kept both like we should have with Leetch/Zubov? We need to learn from history.

It's absolutely going to come down to a choice of keeping one or the other. They're not keeping both in the long-term.

Your comparison doesn't work for several reasons. Leetch and Zubov didn't play the same position. Zubov didn't have a better player ahead of him on the depth chart, like these guys both do with Trouba, but rather an equal or lesser player in Beukeboom who complimented Leetch better. There were no cap considerations in 1995.
 
One guy who was on the block last year who I could see the Rangers being interested in, depending on the price, is Jason Zucker. Minnesota may want to off-load salary and there aren't many spots to do so. He's a pretty consistent 45-55 point winger with great speed and a good 2-way game. 27 years old.

Perhaps something like:

Kreider to BOS for Trent Frederic + BOS 1st

Brett Howden + Joey Keane for Jason Zucker
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad