RangerBoy is bernmeister with better marketing.
that's horrible news. Really sad to hear.Some sad news. Not sure if you remember @Ginger Papa but he passed away. Very sad. He once filled in some GDT's for me awhile back. Was just a fun and enthusiastic poster.
RangerBoy is bernmeister with better marketing.
The Rangers should be able to get a ton back for Adam Fox then.In terms of high-danger chances, nothing separates the three.
1) Makar - 56.43% xGF
2) Fox - 55.19% xGF
3) Hughes - 55.03% xGF
Let's look at raw high-danger chance differential:
1) Makar - +44
2) Fox - +31
3) Hughes - + 25
Fox comes out ahead of Hughes. And keep in mind, the f***in Avalanche are A LOT better than the Rangers. Objectively so in this category.
In terms of goaltending, Makar gets better goaltending!
1) Makar - .918 on-ice sv%
2) Fox - .908 on-ice sv%
3) Hughes - .903 on-ice sv%
In fact, Fox gets some of the worst goaltending on the Rangers, ranking 18th on the squad.
And I know, that's because he sucks, and Igor is facing a bunch of chances, oh no! Except that there isn't a full-time Ranger remaining on the roster who gives up fewer high-danger shot attempts than Fox.
And even if you wanna follow that logic to its fruition, Hughes has to be worse defensively because his numbers are worse in every category.
Don't argue analytics. You're woefully out of your depth. Stick to your game.
Did I upset you again because I suggested trading Adam Fox?RangerBoy is bernmeister with better marketing.
I know he is, but what am I?RangerBoy is bernmeister with better marketing.
ripSome sad news. Not sure if you remember @Ginger Papa but he passed away. Very sad. He once filled in some GDT's for me awhile back. Was just a fun and enthusiastic poster.
Contrary to the old adage, ignorance is not always blisslike Weir sang, "you ain't gonna learn what you don't wanna know"
agreed. what you missed is that it's you who are unwilling to acknowledge the validity of other viewpoints.Contrary to the old adage, ignorance is not always bliss
being unwilling to learn like an ostrich with your head in the sand and your ass exposed is not just not a good look, but what you don't know can hurt/kill ya.
As that applies here, too many people not willing to make an effort to be open minded, think outside the box, try to amplify their right to a subjective based opinion with more objectivity.
learn w/da bern
At this point Panarin seems like a drug that the Rangers are addicted to. He can get away with playing slower, east/west hockey because he's really talented and puts up points but the rest of the team cannot play the same way.Igor is the only reason the team is passable. Idk how people can watch Panarin play and feel any enjoyment. he doesn't do anything a franchise player should. Does he play with pace? No. Does he play in the middle of the ice? No. does he turn the puck over constantly at the blueline? Yes! Does he adjust his game to raise the level of his teammates? No. Is he accountable with the media despite wearing an A? No. Does he show up when it matters most? No.
He has been a top 5 highest paid player in the league his entire Rangers tenure. He's a mercenary and plays like one. We will be much better off when he is gone. The way he plays has infected everyone he is on the ice with. I guarantee during his tenure Mika, Kreider, Fox, Lafreniere and Trocheck are the players on the ice with him the most. they all do the same shit.
Panarin JTM Peterka
Tkachuk Zibs Cuylle
Berard Trocheck Othmann? Gabe if he's not used in Tkachuk deal
Edstrom Carrick Rempe
Chychrun Fox
KAM Borgen
Vaak/Soucy - Fabbro
Sign Chychrun
Sign Fabbro
Schneider for Peterka
Laffy++ for Tkachuk
Kreider to whoever
does this work cap wise? no clue
I just don't see them moving Panarin. He's by far our best offensive player. A down year and he still has 73pts so far. That's not something easily replaced and you know Drury and co. are looking to compete. Only if there's an offer too good to pass up. I don't want 1st rounder draft picks... those are useless to this org.
Kreider is as good as gone. He has 11 Even-Strength points in 50+ games getting predominantly top6 minutes.... Zibs may have upped his value over the past stretch... Still have the NMC to contend with
Our coaching/approach is antiquated. IMO the players have given up and do not buy in. It needs to change along with some core pieces.
younger, fit modern NHL coach.
Some re-tooling. Add a LHD and make a big trade/acquisition.... or two. ( Tkachuk/Peterka etc )
Call all the players fat during the exit interviews and offer free training
If you're of the opinion that Panarin's style of play is affecting other players who try to play the same way but can't because they aren't as talented, then, to me, that's a coaching problem, not a Panarin problem.
Desired by who, you? At the beginning of the year he had like 9 goals in less than 20 games. Then Lav started his line changing blitz. Why? Did Kreider hurt something that he hoped would get better with rest, but it didn't, so he came back at less than 100%? Did he get pissed at the Trouba trade? Doubtful, but who knows? Not you. You say that he shouldn’t have played in the 4 Nation debacle, and I agree, but it was his last chance to “play for his country”. He was stupid, but so was Matt Tkachuk, and Brady, and a half other players who got hurt in it. Either way, if they have better options, by all means bench Kreider, but if not, at least give him a little credit for playing when he could just take the rest of the year off.It's not a matter of for whom. It's a matter of him being healthy or not. If he's injured, and it's affecting his play, then he should have sat out well before we began trading people away.
He only sat out after he played in the 4-nations. Why did he play in that if he was injured? If he wasn't injured, then why has he sucked the entire year prior to that?
I mean, believe what you want, but the way he has handled things this year leaves a lot to be desired.
I would submit that Bread looks at the team and realizes he is the only guy scoring goals this year, and he is putting pressure on himself to score more. Doing so is causing him to take more chances with the puck and thus creating more turnovers. Granted he has always susceptible to turnovers, but I can see why this year he would have even more. As far as the accountability culture, you would have to take that up with the coach, that’s his job.They're in a bind with Panarin. He's simultaneously the best offensive threat and the biggest culprit in terms of affecting the no-accountability culture. To be able to pot 30 goals while playing like crap overall is pretty miraculous. How do you replace those goals is a legit question asked by many. But as long as he gets a free pass to turn over the puck all over the ice, nothing will change.
I'm not the only one calling him out for how uninterested he has seemed this year. If you don't see it, you don't see it.Desired by who, you?
I'm not the only one calling him out for how uninterested he has seemed this year. If you don't see it, you don't see it.
nopeagreed. what you missed is that it's you who are unwilling to acknowledge the validity of other viewpoints.
i personally welcome all types of thinking - inside the box and out. what i don't welcome is rhetoric from someone who insists that their way is the only way to skin the cat. that's you.
So you're asserting that he's entirely so good and yet what's happening around him?In terms of high-danger chances, nothing separates the three.
1) Makar - 56.43% xGF
2) Fox - 55.19% xGF
3) Hughes - 55.03% xGF
Let's look at raw high-danger chance differential:
1) Makar - +44
2) Fox - +31
3) Hughes - + 25
Fox comes out ahead of Hughes. And keep in mind, the f***in Avalanche are A LOT better than the Rangers. Objectively so in this category.
In terms of goaltending, Makar gets better goaltending!
1) Makar - .918 on-ice sv%
2) Fox - .908 on-ice sv%
3) Hughes - .903 on-ice sv%
In fact, Fox gets some of the worst goaltending on the Rangers, ranking 18th on the squad.
And I know, that's because he sucks, and Igor is facing a bunch of chances, oh no! Except that there isn't a full-time Ranger remaining on the roster who gives up fewer high-danger shot attempts than Fox.
And even if you wanna follow that logic to its fruition, Hughes has to be worse defensively because his numbers are worse in every category.
Don't argue analytics. You're woefully out of your depth. Stick to your game.